General and specific effects of foundation species on the structure of alpine-fellfield communities in the Taisetsu Mountains, northern Japan

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Zaal Kikvidze, Gaku Kudo, Maki Suzuki, Yoshiko Shimono, Mikio Sukeno
{"title":"General and specific effects of foundation species on the structure of alpine-fellfield communities in the Taisetsu Mountains, northern Japan","authors":"Zaal Kikvidze,&nbsp;Gaku Kudo,&nbsp;Maki Suzuki,&nbsp;Yoshiko Shimono,&nbsp;Mikio Sukeno","doi":"10.1111/1440-1703.12498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The great majority of studies on foundation species focused on a single dominant plant in a community, while more than one such species can often coexist and compete for space and limited resources. Morphologically different coexisting foundation species can create diverse niches occupied by different subsets of beneficiary species. To test this hypothesis, we sampled alpine plant communities at exposed fellfields in alpine zone, in the Taisetsu Mountains (Hokkaido, northern Japan), with coexisting putative foundation species <i>Pinus pumila</i> (evergreen shrub) and <i>Diapensia lapponica</i> (evergreen cushion-forming shrub), and analyzed their spatial relationships with other plants. Preliminary vegetation survey indicated that fruticose lichens and <i>Loiseleuria procumbens</i> (evergreen mat-forming shrub) might also act as a foundation species; thus, we included them in our analyses. The coexisting foundation species had both general as well as specific effects on plant community structure. Namely, almost all the members of the community aggregated spatially with lichens, while the other foundation species were spatially segregated from each other. These foundation plants associated with different members of the community, thus showing species-specific effects on the community structure. Blooming species showed even stronger patterns of species-specific spatial associations, suggesting that foundation species had beneficial effects on their associated species. We conclude that the focus on coexisting foundation species can reveal important details of community structure which would be hidden if we treated all species as equal members of the community. Studying the effects of coexisting foundation species could greatly advance our understanding of how species diversity functions in plant communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":11434,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Research","volume":"39 5","pages":"744-756"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1703.12498","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The great majority of studies on foundation species focused on a single dominant plant in a community, while more than one such species can often coexist and compete for space and limited resources. Morphologically different coexisting foundation species can create diverse niches occupied by different subsets of beneficiary species. To test this hypothesis, we sampled alpine plant communities at exposed fellfields in alpine zone, in the Taisetsu Mountains (Hokkaido, northern Japan), with coexisting putative foundation species Pinus pumila (evergreen shrub) and Diapensia lapponica (evergreen cushion-forming shrub), and analyzed their spatial relationships with other plants. Preliminary vegetation survey indicated that fruticose lichens and Loiseleuria procumbens (evergreen mat-forming shrub) might also act as a foundation species; thus, we included them in our analyses. The coexisting foundation species had both general as well as specific effects on plant community structure. Namely, almost all the members of the community aggregated spatially with lichens, while the other foundation species were spatially segregated from each other. These foundation plants associated with different members of the community, thus showing species-specific effects on the community structure. Blooming species showed even stronger patterns of species-specific spatial associations, suggesting that foundation species had beneficial effects on their associated species. We conclude that the focus on coexisting foundation species can reveal important details of community structure which would be hidden if we treated all species as equal members of the community. Studying the effects of coexisting foundation species could greatly advance our understanding of how species diversity functions in plant communities.

Abstract Image

基础物种对日本北部大雪山高山落叶群落结构的一般和特殊影响
绝大多数关于基础物种的研究都集中在群落中的单一优势植物上,而多个基础物种往往可以共存并争夺空间和有限的资源。形态各异的共存基础物种可以创造出不同的壁龛,由不同的受益物种子集占据。为了验证这一假设,我们在大雪山(日本北部,北海道)高寒地带的裸露伐木场采集了高寒植物群落样本,并分析了它们与其他植物的空间关系。初步的植被调查表明,褶皱地衣和Loiseleuria procumbens(常绿垫状灌木)也可能是基础物种,因此我们将它们纳入了分析范围。共存的基础物种对植物群落结构既有一般影响,也有特殊影响。也就是说,几乎所有群落成员都在空间上与地衣聚集在一起,而其他基础物种则在空间上相互隔离。这些基础植物与群落中的不同成员相关联,从而显示出物种对群落结构的特定影响。开花物种表现出更强的物种特异性空间关联模式,表明基础物种对其相关物种产生了有益的影响。我们的结论是,关注共存的基础物种可以揭示群落结构的重要细节,而如果我们把所有物种都视为群落中的平等成员,这些细节就会被掩盖。研究共存基础物种的影响可以极大地促进我们对物种多样性如何在植物群落中发挥作用的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Research
Ecological Research 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Research has been published in English by the Ecological Society of Japan since 1986. Ecological Research publishes original papers on all aspects of ecology, in both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信