Long-term crop yield benefits of subsurface drainage on poorly drained soils

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Yichao Rui, Benjamin Goller, Eileen J. Kladivko
{"title":"Long-term crop yield benefits of subsurface drainage on poorly drained soils","authors":"Yichao Rui,&nbsp;Benjamin Goller,&nbsp;Eileen J. Kladivko","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Subsurface drainage is an important agricultural practice that has been widely utilized in the US Midwest to improve the productivity of poorly drained soils. Although widely adopted, long-term yield benefits of drainage, particularly with varying spacings, in an ever-changing climate are largely unknown. The goals of this study were to assess how various drainage spacings (5, 10, and 20 m) impacted crop yields compared to the undrained control in a long-term trial (started in 1984) in southeastern Indiana and how these effects were influenced by the amount of rainfall of specific periods of the growing season. Drainage treatments led to an increase in corn (<i>Zea mays</i>) yields (by 12%–17%) but did not significantly affect soybean (<i>Glycine max</i>) yields compared to the control. In the initial 10 years of the experiment, drainage benefits were subtle and corn yields did not vary significantly across spacing treatments, whereas in the most recent 10 corn years, the drainage treatment effects became more pronounced, likely due to the combined effects of long-term drainage system and conservation practices of no-till and cover crops. Over 37 years, corn yields remained stagnant in the undrained plots but progressively increased in the drained treatments. Both corn and soybean yields showed a negative correlation with rainfall 14 days post-planting, while drainage spacing treatments partially mitigated this negative effect. Our findings underscore the importance of effective drainage as a necessary prerequisite for realizing the potential benefits of conservation practices and improved crop genetics for increased crop productivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 5","pages":"2151-2162"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21621","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21621","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Subsurface drainage is an important agricultural practice that has been widely utilized in the US Midwest to improve the productivity of poorly drained soils. Although widely adopted, long-term yield benefits of drainage, particularly with varying spacings, in an ever-changing climate are largely unknown. The goals of this study were to assess how various drainage spacings (5, 10, and 20 m) impacted crop yields compared to the undrained control in a long-term trial (started in 1984) in southeastern Indiana and how these effects were influenced by the amount of rainfall of specific periods of the growing season. Drainage treatments led to an increase in corn (Zea mays) yields (by 12%–17%) but did not significantly affect soybean (Glycine max) yields compared to the control. In the initial 10 years of the experiment, drainage benefits were subtle and corn yields did not vary significantly across spacing treatments, whereas in the most recent 10 corn years, the drainage treatment effects became more pronounced, likely due to the combined effects of long-term drainage system and conservation practices of no-till and cover crops. Over 37 years, corn yields remained stagnant in the undrained plots but progressively increased in the drained treatments. Both corn and soybean yields showed a negative correlation with rainfall 14 days post-planting, while drainage spacing treatments partially mitigated this negative effect. Our findings underscore the importance of effective drainage as a necessary prerequisite for realizing the potential benefits of conservation practices and improved crop genetics for increased crop productivity.

Abstract Image

排水不良土壤的地下排水对作物产量的长期益处
地下排水是美国中西部地区广泛采用的一种重要农业措施,可提高排水不良土壤的生产力。尽管这种方法已被广泛采用,但在气候不断变化的情况下,排水(尤其是不同间距的排水)的长期产量效益在很大程度上仍是未知数。本研究的目的是评估在印第安纳州东南部的一项长期试验(始于 1984 年)中,与未排水对照相比,不同的排水间距(5 米、10 米和 20 米)对作物产量的影响,以及这些影响如何受到生长季节特定时期降雨量的影响。与对照组相比,排水处理使玉米(Zea mays)产量增加(12%-17%),但对大豆(Glycine max)产量没有显著影响。在实验的最初 10 年中,排水系统的效益并不明显,不同间距处理的玉米产量差异也不大,而在最近的 10 个玉米种植年中,排水系统处理的效果变得更加明显,这可能是由于长期排水系统以及免耕和覆盖作物等保护措施的共同作用。在 37 年的时间里,未排水地块的玉米产量一直停滞不前,但排水处理地块的玉米产量却逐渐增加。玉米和大豆的产量与播种后 14 天的降雨量呈负相关,而排水间距处理则部分缓解了这一负面影响。我们的研究结果强调了有效排水的重要性,它是实现保护措施的潜在效益和改良作物基因以提高作物产量的必要前提。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信