What Is Historical Anti-realism and How to Define It?

IF 0.4 3区历史学 Q1 HISTORY

Journal of the Philosophy of History Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1163/18722636-12341520

Branko Mitrović

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Authors who advocate historical anti-realism have often insisted that they do not claim that no past events happened or that the past did not happen. In this paper, I show that in spite of such protestations, the core arguments presented by Leon Goldstein, Paul Roth, Frank Ankersmit, and Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen preclude the possibility that the past or past events happened.

查看原文本刊更多论文

什么是历史反现实主义，如何定义它？

主张历史反现实主义的作者经常坚称，他们并没有声称过去没有发生过任何事件，也没有声称过去没有发生过任何事件。在本文中，我将证明，尽管有这样的抗议，但莱昂-戈尔茨坦、保罗-罗斯、弗兰克-安克斯密特和约尼-马蒂-库卡宁提出的核心论点排除了过去或过去的事件发生过的可能性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of the Philosophy of History Multiple-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Philosophy of history is a rapidly expanding area. There is growing interest today in: what constitutes knowledge of the past, the ontology of past events, the relationship of language to the past, and the nature of representations of the past. These interests are distinct from – although connected with – contemporary epistemology, philosophy of science, metaphysics, philosophy of language, and aesthetics. Hence we need a distinct venue in which philosophers can explore these issues. Journal of the Philosophy of History provides such a venue. Ever since neo-Kantianism, philosophy of history has been central to all of philosophy, whether or not particular philosophers recognized its potential significance.