Which birds have the most to lose? an analysis of bird species’ feeding habitat in changing Australian landscapes

IF 3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Carly E. Campbell, Darryl N. Jones, Monica Awasthy, J. Guy Castley, Alienor L.M. Chauvenet
{"title":"Which birds have the most to lose? an analysis of bird species’ feeding habitat in changing Australian landscapes","authors":"Carly E. Campbell, Darryl N. Jones, Monica Awasthy, J. Guy Castley, Alienor L.M. Chauvenet","doi":"10.1007/s10531-024-02890-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Australia has lost vast areas of its natural vegetation through agriculture and urbanization, resulting in the area of suitable habitat for many Australian bird species being greatly diminished. Given the geographical and ecological biases in anthropogenic land use, the impact of habitat loss now and into the future may be disproportionately high for some species, threatening their long-term persistence. Such changes are occurring rapidly, and habitat loss needs to be monitored dynamically to prevent extinction. To monitor changes in available unmodified species habitat, we use species’ area of feeding habitat (AFH), which represents the area of habitat within a species’ range with vegetation matching their feeding requirements. We analysed the past, current and future threats of habitat modification for 467 Australian bird species by calculating AFH across three time periods: pre-colonization, current (2020), and a projected future scenario (2100). These values were used to identify species subject to substantial habitat loss due to urbanization and agriculture and delineate predictors of such losses. Most species had experienced habitat loss since colonization (<i>n</i> = 442, 95%), and species that had already experienced considerable habitat loss were more likely to lose habitat into the future. Species with particular habitat associations (e.g., Mallee), were also more prone to greater proportions of habitat lost. The results highlight the utility of AFH and emphasize the importance of protecting what habitat remains for the species with highly depleted geographic ranges, noting that those that have experienced the most loss of unmodified habitat are the most likely to lose more unmodified habitat under future conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8843,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity and Conservation","volume":"170 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodiversity and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02890-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Australia has lost vast areas of its natural vegetation through agriculture and urbanization, resulting in the area of suitable habitat for many Australian bird species being greatly diminished. Given the geographical and ecological biases in anthropogenic land use, the impact of habitat loss now and into the future may be disproportionately high for some species, threatening their long-term persistence. Such changes are occurring rapidly, and habitat loss needs to be monitored dynamically to prevent extinction. To monitor changes in available unmodified species habitat, we use species’ area of feeding habitat (AFH), which represents the area of habitat within a species’ range with vegetation matching their feeding requirements. We analysed the past, current and future threats of habitat modification for 467 Australian bird species by calculating AFH across three time periods: pre-colonization, current (2020), and a projected future scenario (2100). These values were used to identify species subject to substantial habitat loss due to urbanization and agriculture and delineate predictors of such losses. Most species had experienced habitat loss since colonization (n = 442, 95%), and species that had already experienced considerable habitat loss were more likely to lose habitat into the future. Species with particular habitat associations (e.g., Mallee), were also more prone to greater proportions of habitat lost. The results highlight the utility of AFH and emphasize the importance of protecting what habitat remains for the species with highly depleted geographic ranges, noting that those that have experienced the most loss of unmodified habitat are the most likely to lose more unmodified habitat under future conditions.

Abstract Image

分析鸟类在澳大利亚不断变化的地貌中的觅食栖息地
由于农业和城市化的发展,澳大利亚失去了大面积的自然植被,导致许多澳大利亚鸟类物种的适宜栖息地面积大大减少。考虑到人为土地使用的地理和生态偏差,栖息地丧失对某些物种现在和未来的影响可能会大得不成比例,威胁到它们的长期生存。这种变化正在迅速发生,因此需要对栖息地丧失情况进行动态监测,以防止物种灭绝。为了监测可用的未修改物种栖息地的变化,我们使用了物种的觅食栖息地面积(AFH),它代表了物种分布范围内植被符合其觅食要求的栖息地面积。我们分析了 467 种澳大利亚鸟类过去、现在和未来面临的栖息地改变威胁,计算了三个时间段的 AFH:殖民前、现在(2020 年)和预测的未来情景(2100 年)。这些数值被用来确定因城市化和农业而导致栖息地大量丧失的物种,并确定预测此类丧失的因素。大多数物种自殖民以来都经历过栖息地丧失(n = 442,95%),已经经历过大量栖息地丧失的物种更有可能在未来丧失栖息地。与特定栖息地有关联的物种(如Mallee)也更容易失去更多的栖息地。这些结果突显了AFH的实用性,并强调了保护地理范围内高度衰竭的物种所剩栖息地的重要性,同时指出,那些经历了最严重的未修改栖息地丧失的物种在未来条件下最有可能丧失更多的未修改栖息地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biodiversity and Conservation
Biodiversity and Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
153
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: Biodiversity and Conservation is an international journal that publishes articles on all aspects of biological diversity-its description, analysis and conservation, and its controlled rational use by humankind. The scope of Biodiversity and Conservation is wide and multidisciplinary, and embraces all life-forms. The journal presents research papers, as well as editorials, comments and research notes on biodiversity and conservation, and contributions dealing with the practicalities of conservation management, economic, social and political issues. The journal provides a forum for examining conflicts between sustainable development and human dependence on biodiversity in agriculture, environmental management and biotechnology, and encourages contributions from developing countries to promote broad global perspectives on matters of biodiversity and conservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信