Bayesian interface technique-based inverse estimation of closure coefficients of standard k−ϵ turbulence model by limiting the number of DNS data points for flow over a periodic hill
Nagendra Kumar Chaurasia and Shubhankar Chakraborty
{"title":"Bayesian interface technique-based inverse estimation of closure coefficients of standard k−ϵ turbulence model by limiting the number of DNS data points for flow over a periodic hill","authors":"Nagendra Kumar Chaurasia and Shubhankar Chakraborty","doi":"10.1088/1361-6420/ad5a34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among different numerical methods for modeling turbulent flow, Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) is the most commonly used and computationally reasonable. However, the accuracy of RANS is lower than that of other high-fidelity numerical methods. In this work, the uncertainties associated with the coefficients of the standard RANS turbulence model are estimated and calibrated to improve the accuracy. The calibration is performed by considering the coefficients individually as well as collectively. The first three coefficients of the standard turbulence model are calibrated among the five coefficients ( and σk ). The Bayesian inference technique using the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm is applied to quantify uncertainties and calibration. Flow over a periodic hill is selected as a test case. The separation height of the bubble at and , along with the streamwise velocity at various locations, has been chosen as the quantities of interest for comparing the results with DNS. The calibration is performed using known high-fidelity data (direct numerical simulation) from the available data set. The velocity field is re-calculated from the calibrated closure coefficients and compared with the same calculated with the standard coefficients of turbulence model (baseline). The deviation of calibrated Cµ is almost 50%–60% from baseline and for and it is 3%–12% and 6%–9% respectively. The algorithm is tested for different Reynold numbers and data points. A sensitivity analysis is also performed.","PeriodicalId":50275,"journal":{"name":"Inverse Problems","volume":"205 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inverse Problems","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/ad5a34","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Among different numerical methods for modeling turbulent flow, Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) is the most commonly used and computationally reasonable. However, the accuracy of RANS is lower than that of other high-fidelity numerical methods. In this work, the uncertainties associated with the coefficients of the standard RANS turbulence model are estimated and calibrated to improve the accuracy. The calibration is performed by considering the coefficients individually as well as collectively. The first three coefficients of the standard turbulence model are calibrated among the five coefficients ( and σk ). The Bayesian inference technique using the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm is applied to quantify uncertainties and calibration. Flow over a periodic hill is selected as a test case. The separation height of the bubble at and , along with the streamwise velocity at various locations, has been chosen as the quantities of interest for comparing the results with DNS. The calibration is performed using known high-fidelity data (direct numerical simulation) from the available data set. The velocity field is re-calculated from the calibrated closure coefficients and compared with the same calculated with the standard coefficients of turbulence model (baseline). The deviation of calibrated Cµ is almost 50%–60% from baseline and for and it is 3%–12% and 6%–9% respectively. The algorithm is tested for different Reynold numbers and data points. A sensitivity analysis is also performed.
期刊介绍:
An interdisciplinary journal combining mathematical and experimental papers on inverse problems with theoretical, numerical and practical approaches to their solution.
As well as applied mathematicians, physical scientists and engineers, the readership includes those working in geophysics, radar, optics, biology, acoustics, communication theory, signal processing and imaging, among others.
The emphasis is on publishing original contributions to methods of solving mathematical, physical and applied problems. To be publishable in this journal, papers must meet the highest standards of scientific quality, contain significant and original new science and should present substantial advancement in the field. Due to the broad scope of the journal, we require that authors provide sufficient introductory material to appeal to the wide readership and that articles which are not explicitly applied include a discussion of possible applications.