Evaluating Short-Range Forecasts of a 12 km Global Ensemble Prediction System and a 4 km Convection-Permitting Regional Ensemble Prediction System

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Ashu Mamgain, S. Kiran Prasad, Abhijit Sarkar, Gauri Shanker, Anumeha Dube, Ashis K. Mitra
{"title":"Evaluating Short-Range Forecasts of a 12 km Global Ensemble Prediction System and a 4 km Convection-Permitting Regional Ensemble Prediction System","authors":"Ashu Mamgain,&nbsp;S. Kiran Prasad,&nbsp;Abhijit Sarkar,&nbsp;Gauri Shanker,&nbsp;Anumeha Dube,&nbsp;Ashis K. Mitra","doi":"10.1007/s00024-024-03524-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Information regarding the uncertainty associated with weather forecasts, particularly when they are related to a localized area at convective scales, can certainly play a crucial role in enhancing decision-making. In this study, we discuss and evaluate a short-range forecast (0–75 h) from of a regional ensemble prediction system (NEPS-R) running operationally at the National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (NCMRWF). NEPS-R operates at a convective scale (~ 4 km) with 11 perturbed ensemble members and a control run. We assess the performance of the NEPS-R in comparison to its coarser-resolution global counterpart (NEPS-G), which is also operational. NEPS-R relies on initial and boundary conditions provided by NEPS-G. The NEPS-G produces valuable forecast products and is capable of predicting weather patterns and events at a spatial resolution of 12 km. The objective of this study is to investigate areas where NEPS-R forecasts could add value to the short-range forecasts of NEPS-G. Verification is conducted for the period from 1st August to 30th September 2019, covering the summer monsoon over a domain encompassing India and its neighboring regions, using the same ensemble size (11 members). In addition to standard verification metrics, fraction skill scores, and potential economic values are used as the evaluation measures for the ensemble prediction systems (EPSs). Near-surface variables such as precipitation and zonal wind at 850 hPa (U850) are considered in this study. The results suggest that, in some cases, such as extreme precipitation, there is a benefit in using regional EPS forecast. State-of-the-art probabilistic measures indicate that the regional EPS has reduced under-dispersion in the case of precipitation compared to the global EPS. The global EPS tends to provide higher skill scores for U850 forecasts, whereas the regional EPS outperforms the global EPS for heavy precipitation events (&gt; 65 mm/day). There are instances when the regional EPS can provide a useful forecast for cases, including moderate rainfall, and can add more value to the global EPS forecast products. The investigation of diurnal variations in precipitation forecasts reveals that although both models struggle to predict the correct timing, the time phase and peaks in precipitation in the convection-permitting regional model are closer to the observations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21078,"journal":{"name":"pure and applied geophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"pure and applied geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00024-024-03524-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Information regarding the uncertainty associated with weather forecasts, particularly when they are related to a localized area at convective scales, can certainly play a crucial role in enhancing decision-making. In this study, we discuss and evaluate a short-range forecast (0–75 h) from of a regional ensemble prediction system (NEPS-R) running operationally at the National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (NCMRWF). NEPS-R operates at a convective scale (~ 4 km) with 11 perturbed ensemble members and a control run. We assess the performance of the NEPS-R in comparison to its coarser-resolution global counterpart (NEPS-G), which is also operational. NEPS-R relies on initial and boundary conditions provided by NEPS-G. The NEPS-G produces valuable forecast products and is capable of predicting weather patterns and events at a spatial resolution of 12 km. The objective of this study is to investigate areas where NEPS-R forecasts could add value to the short-range forecasts of NEPS-G. Verification is conducted for the period from 1st August to 30th September 2019, covering the summer monsoon over a domain encompassing India and its neighboring regions, using the same ensemble size (11 members). In addition to standard verification metrics, fraction skill scores, and potential economic values are used as the evaluation measures for the ensemble prediction systems (EPSs). Near-surface variables such as precipitation and zonal wind at 850 hPa (U850) are considered in this study. The results suggest that, in some cases, such as extreme precipitation, there is a benefit in using regional EPS forecast. State-of-the-art probabilistic measures indicate that the regional EPS has reduced under-dispersion in the case of precipitation compared to the global EPS. The global EPS tends to provide higher skill scores for U850 forecasts, whereas the regional EPS outperforms the global EPS for heavy precipitation events (> 65 mm/day). There are instances when the regional EPS can provide a useful forecast for cases, including moderate rainfall, and can add more value to the global EPS forecast products. The investigation of diurnal variations in precipitation forecasts reveals that although both models struggle to predict the correct timing, the time phase and peaks in precipitation in the convection-permitting regional model are closer to the observations.

Abstract Image

评估 12 千米全球集合预报系统和 4 千米对流允许区域集合预报系统的短程预报
与天气预报相关的不确定性信息,尤其是当天气预报涉及对流尺度的局部区域时,肯定会在加强决策方面发挥至关重要的作用。在本研究中,我们讨论并评估了在国家中程天气预报中心(NCMRWF)运行的区域集合预报系统(NEPS-R)的短程预报(0-75 h)。NEPS-R 在对流尺度(约 4 公里)上运行,有 11 个扰动集合成员和一个对照运行。我们将 NEPS-R 的性能与其更粗分辨率的全球对应系统(NEPS-G)进行了比较评估,后者也在运行中。NEPS-R 依靠 NEPS-G 提供的初始条件和边界条件。NEPS-G 可生成有价值的预报产品,能够预测空间分辨率为 12 千米的天气模式和事件。这项研究的目的是调查 NEPS-R 预报可在哪些方面为 NEPS-G 的短程预报增添价值。核查时间为 2019 年 8 月 1 日至 9 月 30 日,覆盖范围包括印度及其邻近地区的夏季季风,使用相同的集合规模(11 个成员)。除标准验证指标外,还使用了分数技能得分和潜在经济价值作为集合预测系统(EPS)的评估指标。本研究考虑了降水和 850 hPa(U850)带状风等近地面变量。结果表明,在某些情况下,如极端降水,使用区域 EPS 预测是有好处的。最先进的概率测量结果表明,与全球 EPS 相比,区域 EPS 在降水情况下减少了低分散性。在 U850 预报中,全球 EPS 的技能得分往往更高,而在强降水事件(65 毫米/天)中,区域 EPS 的技能得分则优于全球 EPS。在某些情况下,区域 EPS 可以提供包括中雨在内的有用预报,并为全球 EPS 预报产品增加更多价值。对降水预报昼夜变化的研究表明,虽然两种模式都难以预测到正确的时间,但允许对流的区域模式的降水时相和峰值更接近观测结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
pure and applied geophysics
pure and applied geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
240
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: pure and applied geophysics (pageoph), a continuation of the journal "Geofisica pura e applicata", publishes original scientific contributions in the fields of solid Earth, atmospheric and oceanic sciences. Regular and special issues feature thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and state-of-the-art surveys. Long running journal, founded in 1939 as Geofisica pura e applicata Publishes peer-reviewed original scientific contributions and state-of-the-art surveys in solid earth and atmospheric sciences Features thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and is a major source for publications on tsunami research Coverage extends to research topics in oceanic sciences See Instructions for Authors on the right hand side.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信