Ashu Mamgain, S. Kiran Prasad, Abhijit Sarkar, Gauri Shanker, Anumeha Dube, Ashis K. Mitra
{"title":"Evaluating Short-Range Forecasts of a 12 km Global Ensemble Prediction System and a 4 km Convection-Permitting Regional Ensemble Prediction System","authors":"Ashu Mamgain, S. Kiran Prasad, Abhijit Sarkar, Gauri Shanker, Anumeha Dube, Ashis K. Mitra","doi":"10.1007/s00024-024-03524-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Information regarding the uncertainty associated with weather forecasts, particularly when they are related to a localized area at convective scales, can certainly play a crucial role in enhancing decision-making. In this study, we discuss and evaluate a short-range forecast (0–75 h) from of a regional ensemble prediction system (NEPS-R) running operationally at the National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (NCMRWF). NEPS-R operates at a convective scale (~ 4 km) with 11 perturbed ensemble members and a control run. We assess the performance of the NEPS-R in comparison to its coarser-resolution global counterpart (NEPS-G), which is also operational. NEPS-R relies on initial and boundary conditions provided by NEPS-G. The NEPS-G produces valuable forecast products and is capable of predicting weather patterns and events at a spatial resolution of 12 km. The objective of this study is to investigate areas where NEPS-R forecasts could add value to the short-range forecasts of NEPS-G. Verification is conducted for the period from 1st August to 30th September 2019, covering the summer monsoon over a domain encompassing India and its neighboring regions, using the same ensemble size (11 members). In addition to standard verification metrics, fraction skill scores, and potential economic values are used as the evaluation measures for the ensemble prediction systems (EPSs). Near-surface variables such as precipitation and zonal wind at 850 hPa (U850) are considered in this study. The results suggest that, in some cases, such as extreme precipitation, there is a benefit in using regional EPS forecast. State-of-the-art probabilistic measures indicate that the regional EPS has reduced under-dispersion in the case of precipitation compared to the global EPS. The global EPS tends to provide higher skill scores for U850 forecasts, whereas the regional EPS outperforms the global EPS for heavy precipitation events (> 65 mm/day). There are instances when the regional EPS can provide a useful forecast for cases, including moderate rainfall, and can add more value to the global EPS forecast products. The investigation of diurnal variations in precipitation forecasts reveals that although both models struggle to predict the correct timing, the time phase and peaks in precipitation in the convection-permitting regional model are closer to the observations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21078,"journal":{"name":"pure and applied geophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"pure and applied geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00024-024-03524-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Information regarding the uncertainty associated with weather forecasts, particularly when they are related to a localized area at convective scales, can certainly play a crucial role in enhancing decision-making. In this study, we discuss and evaluate a short-range forecast (0–75 h) from of a regional ensemble prediction system (NEPS-R) running operationally at the National Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (NCMRWF). NEPS-R operates at a convective scale (~ 4 km) with 11 perturbed ensemble members and a control run. We assess the performance of the NEPS-R in comparison to its coarser-resolution global counterpart (NEPS-G), which is also operational. NEPS-R relies on initial and boundary conditions provided by NEPS-G. The NEPS-G produces valuable forecast products and is capable of predicting weather patterns and events at a spatial resolution of 12 km. The objective of this study is to investigate areas where NEPS-R forecasts could add value to the short-range forecasts of NEPS-G. Verification is conducted for the period from 1st August to 30th September 2019, covering the summer monsoon over a domain encompassing India and its neighboring regions, using the same ensemble size (11 members). In addition to standard verification metrics, fraction skill scores, and potential economic values are used as the evaluation measures for the ensemble prediction systems (EPSs). Near-surface variables such as precipitation and zonal wind at 850 hPa (U850) are considered in this study. The results suggest that, in some cases, such as extreme precipitation, there is a benefit in using regional EPS forecast. State-of-the-art probabilistic measures indicate that the regional EPS has reduced under-dispersion in the case of precipitation compared to the global EPS. The global EPS tends to provide higher skill scores for U850 forecasts, whereas the regional EPS outperforms the global EPS for heavy precipitation events (> 65 mm/day). There are instances when the regional EPS can provide a useful forecast for cases, including moderate rainfall, and can add more value to the global EPS forecast products. The investigation of diurnal variations in precipitation forecasts reveals that although both models struggle to predict the correct timing, the time phase and peaks in precipitation in the convection-permitting regional model are closer to the observations.
期刊介绍:
pure and applied geophysics (pageoph), a continuation of the journal "Geofisica pura e applicata", publishes original scientific contributions in the fields of solid Earth, atmospheric and oceanic sciences. Regular and special issues feature thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and state-of-the-art surveys.
Long running journal, founded in 1939 as Geofisica pura e applicata
Publishes peer-reviewed original scientific contributions and state-of-the-art surveys in solid earth and atmospheric sciences
Features thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and is a major source for publications on tsunami research
Coverage extends to research topics in oceanic sciences
See Instructions for Authors on the right hand side.