The Association Between Individual Differences in Motivational Readiness at Entry to Treatment and Treatment Attendance and Outcome in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy: A Systematic Review

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Catherine Crane, Matthew Hotton, Lucas Shelemy, Rebecca Knowles-Bevis
{"title":"The Association Between Individual Differences in Motivational Readiness at Entry to Treatment and Treatment Attendance and Outcome in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy: A Systematic Review","authors":"Catherine Crane, Matthew Hotton, Lucas Shelemy, Rebecca Knowles-Bevis","doi":"10.1007/s10608-024-10504-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>There is considerable interest in identifying factors that predict outcome from psychological treatment. This review examines the relationship between readiness / stage of change at entry to CBT treatment and treatment attendance or outcome in people with mental health problems other than addiction.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Four databases: PsycINFO; MEDLINE; Embase and CINAHL were searched to identify relevant studies published in English from 1st January 1980 onwards. Following title and abstract screening, and full text review of potentially eligible studies, a total of 22 eligible studies were identified, of which 21 were included in the narrative synthesis. The review was registered on PROSPERO REF: CRD42020209173.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Nineteen studies explored the relationship between readiness and symptom outcome, with a majority (<i>n</i> = 13) identifying at least one statistically significant relationship between variables, either directly or in interaction with another measure. A number of these also tested other associations which were non-significant. In contrast, five studies explored the association between readiness and treatment attendance, and findings were inconclusive.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>The systematic review found some evidence suggesting that readiness is linked to symptom outcome in CBT, regardless of the type of clinical problem or readiness measure used. The studies adopting an RCT design identified no evidence of differences in the relationship between readiness and outcome when comparing CBT to other psychotherapeutic interventions. Study quality was variable, and a range of methodological limitations and potential avenues for future work are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48316,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Therapy and Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-024-10504-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There is considerable interest in identifying factors that predict outcome from psychological treatment. This review examines the relationship between readiness / stage of change at entry to CBT treatment and treatment attendance or outcome in people with mental health problems other than addiction.

Methods

Four databases: PsycINFO; MEDLINE; Embase and CINAHL were searched to identify relevant studies published in English from 1st January 1980 onwards. Following title and abstract screening, and full text review of potentially eligible studies, a total of 22 eligible studies were identified, of which 21 were included in the narrative synthesis. The review was registered on PROSPERO REF: CRD42020209173.

Results

Nineteen studies explored the relationship between readiness and symptom outcome, with a majority (n = 13) identifying at least one statistically significant relationship between variables, either directly or in interaction with another measure. A number of these also tested other associations which were non-significant. In contrast, five studies explored the association between readiness and treatment attendance, and findings were inconclusive.

Conclusions

The systematic review found some evidence suggesting that readiness is linked to symptom outcome in CBT, regardless of the type of clinical problem or readiness measure used. The studies adopting an RCT design identified no evidence of differences in the relationship between readiness and outcome when comparing CBT to other psychotherapeutic interventions. Study quality was variable, and a range of methodological limitations and potential avenues for future work are discussed.

Abstract Image

认知行为疗法中个体进入治疗时的动机准备程度差异与治疗出席率和治疗结果之间的关系:系统回顾
背景人们对确定预测心理治疗结果的因素非常感兴趣。本综述研究了非成瘾性心理健康问题患者接受 CBT 治疗时的准备程度/改变阶段与治疗出席率或治疗结果之间的关系:检索了 PsycINFO、MEDLINE、Embase 和 CINAHL 四个数据库,以确定 1980 年 1 月 1 日以后用英语发表的相关研究。经过标题和摘要筛选,以及对可能符合条件的研究进行全文审阅,共确定了 22 项符合条件的研究,其中 21 项被纳入叙述性综述。该综述已在 PROSPERO REF:结果19项研究探讨了心理准备与症状结果之间的关系,其中大多数(n = 13)确定了变量之间至少一种具有统计学意义的关系,无论是直接关系还是与其他措施的交互关系。其中一些研究还测试了其他关系,但这些关系并不显著。与此相反,有五项研究探讨了治疗准备度与治疗出席率之间的关系,但结果并不确定。结论该系统综述发现了一些证据,表明无论临床问题的类型或使用的治疗准备度测量方法如何,治疗准备度都与 CBT 的症状结果有关。采用 RCT 设计的研究发现,在将 CBT 与其他心理治疗干预措施进行比较时,没有证据表明准备度与治疗结果之间存在差异。研究质量参差不齐,本文讨论了一系列方法上的局限性以及未来工作的潜在途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Cognitive Therapy and Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Cognitive Therapy and Research (COTR) focuses on the investigation of cognitive processes in human adaptation and adjustment and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). It is an interdisciplinary journal welcoming submissions from diverse areas of psychology, including cognitive, clinical, developmental, experimental, personality, social, learning, affective neuroscience, emotion research, therapy mechanism, and pharmacotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信