Updating the No-History Method in Intraocular Lens Power Calculation After Myopic Laser Vision Correction

H. John Shammas, David L. Cooke, Kamran M. Riaz, Rahul Tonk, Maya C. Shammas, Adam Bleeker, Abdelrahman M. Anter, Sanjana Suraneni, Sebastian Leal
{"title":"Updating the No-History Method in Intraocular Lens Power Calculation After Myopic Laser Vision Correction","authors":"H. John Shammas, David L. Cooke, Kamran M. Riaz, Rahul Tonk, Maya C. Shammas, Adam Bleeker, Abdelrahman M. Anter, Sanjana Suraneni, Sebastian Leal","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE: To describe the Shammas-Cooke formula, an updated no-history (NH) formula for IOL calculation in eyes with prior myopic laser vision correction (M-LVC), and to compare the results to the Shammas PL, Haigis-L and Barrett True-K NH formulas. SETTING: Bascom Palmer Eye Institute (BPEI), The Lennar Foundation Medical Center, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA; Dean A. McGee Eye Institute (DMEI), University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA; and private practice, Lynwood, California, USA and St Joseph, Michigan, USA. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. METHODS: We analyzed two large series of cataractous eyes with prior M-LVC. The training set (BPEI series of 330 eyes) was used to derive the new corneal power conversion equation to be used in the novel Shammas-Cooke formula, and the testing set (165 eyes of 165 patients in the DMEI series) to compare the updated formula to three other M-LVC NH formulas on the ASCRS calculator: Shammas PL, Haigis-L and Barrett True-K NH. RESULTS: Mean prediction error was 0.09±0.56, -0.44±0.61, -0.47±0.59 and -0.18±0.56 D, and the mean absolute error was 0.43, 0.60, 0.61 and 0.45 D for the Shammas-Cooke, Shammas PL, Haigis-L and Barrett True-K NH. The percentage of eyes within ± 0.50 D was 66.7% versus 47.9%, 48.5% and 65.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Shammas-Cooke formula performed better than the Shammas PL and Haigis-L (P<0.001 for both) and as well as the Barrett True-K NH formula (P=0.923).","PeriodicalId":15233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery","volume":"137 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the Shammas-Cooke formula, an updated no-history (NH) formula for IOL calculation in eyes with prior myopic laser vision correction (M-LVC), and to compare the results to the Shammas PL, Haigis-L and Barrett True-K NH formulas. SETTING: Bascom Palmer Eye Institute (BPEI), The Lennar Foundation Medical Center, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA; Dean A. McGee Eye Institute (DMEI), University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA; and private practice, Lynwood, California, USA and St Joseph, Michigan, USA. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. METHODS: We analyzed two large series of cataractous eyes with prior M-LVC. The training set (BPEI series of 330 eyes) was used to derive the new corneal power conversion equation to be used in the novel Shammas-Cooke formula, and the testing set (165 eyes of 165 patients in the DMEI series) to compare the updated formula to three other M-LVC NH formulas on the ASCRS calculator: Shammas PL, Haigis-L and Barrett True-K NH. RESULTS: Mean prediction error was 0.09±0.56, -0.44±0.61, -0.47±0.59 and -0.18±0.56 D, and the mean absolute error was 0.43, 0.60, 0.61 and 0.45 D for the Shammas-Cooke, Shammas PL, Haigis-L and Barrett True-K NH. The percentage of eyes within ± 0.50 D was 66.7% versus 47.9%, 48.5% and 65.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Shammas-Cooke formula performed better than the Shammas PL and Haigis-L (P<0.001 for both) and as well as the Barrett True-K NH formula (P=0.923).
更新近视激光视力矫正后眼内透镜功率计算中的无历史记录法
目的: 描述 Shammas-Cooke 公式,这是一种用于近视激光视力矫正 (M-LVC) 眼人工晶体计算的最新无历史 (NH) 公式,并将结果与 Shammas PL、Haigis-L 和 Barrett True-K NH 公式进行比较。设置:美国佛罗里达州迈阿密市迈阿密大学伦纳基金会医疗中心巴斯科姆-帕尔默眼科研究所(BPEI);美国俄克拉荷马州俄克拉荷马大学迪安-麦基眼科研究所(DMEI);美国加利福尼亚州林伍德和美国密歇根州圣约瑟夫的私人诊所。设计:回顾性观察研究。方法:我们分析了两组曾接受过 M-LVC 的大型白内障眼。训练集(BPEI 系列的 330 只眼睛)用于推导新型 Shammas-Cooke 公式中使用的新角膜力转换方程,测试集(DMEI 系列 165 名患者的 165 只眼睛)用于将更新后的公式与 ASCRS 计算器中的其他三个 M-LVC NH 公式进行比较:Shammas PL、Haigis-L 和 Barrett True-K NH。结果:Shammas-Cooke、Shammas PL、Haigis-L 和 Barrett True-K NH 的平均预测误差分别为 0.09±0.56、-0.44±0.61、-0.47±0.59 和 -0.18±0.56 D,平均绝对误差分别为 0.43、0.60、0.61 和 0.45 D。±0.50D以内的眼睛比例分别为66.7%对47.9%、48.5%和65.5%。结论:Shammas-Cooke 公式的性能优于 Shammas PL 和 Haigis-L(P<0.001),也优于 Barrett True-K NH 公式(P=0.923)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信