Improvements in learning addition and subtraction when using a structural approach in first grade

IF 3.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Angelika Kullberg, Camilla Björklund, Ulla Runesson Kempe, Irma Brkovic, Maria Nord, Tuula Maunula
{"title":"Improvements in learning addition and subtraction when using a structural approach in first grade","authors":"Angelika Kullberg, Camilla Björklund, Ulla Runesson Kempe, Irma Brkovic, Maria Nord, Tuula Maunula","doi":"10.1007/s10649-024-10339-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Learning to calculate with natural numbers by structuring seems promising but how this can be taught in a sustainable manner remains an open question. An eight-month-long intervention based on the idea of using a structural approach to addition and subtraction, and particularly bridging through ten, was implemented in four Swedish first-grade classes. One goal was that by the end of first grade, students would be able to solve tasks such as subtracting 8 from 15 by using part-whole number relations. In this paper, we report on learning outcomes from task-based interviews with intervention and control groups before, immediately after, and one year after the intervention, in order to investigate long-term effects and whether students used a structural approach when solving tasks in a higher number range in the second grade. In comparison to controls, students in the intervention group showed higher increases in their learning outcomes. Moreover, the intervention group used a structural approach to a larger extent when solving tasks in higher number ranges, whereas students in the control group more commonly used single-unit counting to solve such tasks. These findings have implications both for teaching and for research on students’ development of arithmetic skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":48107,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies in Mathematics","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Studies in Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10339-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Learning to calculate with natural numbers by structuring seems promising but how this can be taught in a sustainable manner remains an open question. An eight-month-long intervention based on the idea of using a structural approach to addition and subtraction, and particularly bridging through ten, was implemented in four Swedish first-grade classes. One goal was that by the end of first grade, students would be able to solve tasks such as subtracting 8 from 15 by using part-whole number relations. In this paper, we report on learning outcomes from task-based interviews with intervention and control groups before, immediately after, and one year after the intervention, in order to investigate long-term effects and whether students used a structural approach when solving tasks in a higher number range in the second grade. In comparison to controls, students in the intervention group showed higher increases in their learning outcomes. Moreover, the intervention group used a structural approach to a larger extent when solving tasks in higher number ranges, whereas students in the control group more commonly used single-unit counting to solve such tasks. These findings have implications both for teaching and for research on students’ development of arithmetic skills.

Abstract Image

在一年级采用结构教学法学习加减法时的进步
通过结构化学习自然数的计算似乎很有前途,但如何以可持续的方式进行教学仍是一个未决问题。在瑞典的四个一年级班级中,实施了一项为期八个月的干预措施,该措施基于使用结构化方法学习加减法,特别是通过十进制进行衔接的理念。其中一个目标是,到一年级结束时,学生能够通过使用部分与整体的数字关系来解决诸如从 15 减去 8 的任务。在本文中,我们报告了干预组和对照组在干预前、干预后和干预一年后基于任务的访谈中取得的学习成果,目的是调查长期效果,以及学生在二年级解决更高数范围的任务时是否使用了结构化方法。与对照组相比,干预组学生的学习成绩提高幅度更大。此外,干预组的学生在解决较高数范围的任务时更多地使用了结构方法,而对照组的学生则更多地使用单位计数法来解决此类任务。这些发现对教学和学生算术技能发展的研究都有意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Studies in Mathematics
Educational Studies in Mathematics EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.40%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Educational Studies in Mathematics presents new ideas and developments of major importance to those working in the field of mathematics education. It seeks to reflect both the variety of research concerns within this field and the range of methods used to study them. It deals with methodological, pedagogical/didactical, political and socio-cultural aspects of teaching and learning of mathematics, rather than with specific programmes for teaching mathematics. Within this range, Educational Studies in Mathematics is open to all research approaches. The emphasis is on high-level articles which are of more than local or national interest.? All contributions to this journal are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信