MOUNTAINEER: Topology-Driven Visual Analytics for Comparing Local Explanations

Parikshit Solunke, Vitoria Guardieiro, Joao Rulff, Peter Xenopoulos, Gromit Yeuk-Yin Chan, Brian Barr, Luis Gustavo Nonato, Claudio Silva
{"title":"MOUNTAINEER: Topology-Driven Visual Analytics for Comparing Local Explanations","authors":"Parikshit Solunke, Vitoria Guardieiro, Joao Rulff, Peter Xenopoulos, Gromit Yeuk-Yin Chan, Brian Barr, Luis Gustavo Nonato, Claudio Silva","doi":"arxiv-2406.15613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the increasing use of black-box Machine Learning (ML) techniques in\ncritical applications, there is a growing demand for methods that can provide\ntransparency and accountability for model predictions. As a result, a large\nnumber of local explainability methods for black-box models have been developed\nand popularized. However, machine learning explanations are still hard to\nevaluate and compare due to the high dimensionality, heterogeneous\nrepresentations, varying scales, and stochastic nature of some of these\nmethods. Topological Data Analysis (TDA) can be an effective method in this\ndomain since it can be used to transform attributions into uniform graph\nrepresentations, providing a common ground for comparison across different\nexplanation methods. We present a novel topology-driven visual analytics tool, Mountaineer, that\nallows ML practitioners to interactively analyze and compare these\nrepresentations by linking the topological graphs back to the original data\ndistribution, model predictions, and feature attributions. Mountaineer\nfacilitates rapid and iterative exploration of ML explanations, enabling\nexperts to gain deeper insights into the explanation techniques, understand the\nunderlying data distributions, and thus reach well-founded conclusions about\nmodel behavior. Furthermore, we demonstrate the utility of Mountaineer through\ntwo case studies using real-world data. In the first, we show how Mountaineer\nenabled us to compare black-box ML explanations and discern regions of and\ncauses of disagreements between different explanations. In the second, we\ndemonstrate how the tool can be used to compare and understand ML models\nthemselves. Finally, we conducted interviews with three industry experts to\nhelp us evaluate our work.","PeriodicalId":501119,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - MATH - Algebraic Topology","volume":"164 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - MATH - Algebraic Topology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2406.15613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the increasing use of black-box Machine Learning (ML) techniques in critical applications, there is a growing demand for methods that can provide transparency and accountability for model predictions. As a result, a large number of local explainability methods for black-box models have been developed and popularized. However, machine learning explanations are still hard to evaluate and compare due to the high dimensionality, heterogeneous representations, varying scales, and stochastic nature of some of these methods. Topological Data Analysis (TDA) can be an effective method in this domain since it can be used to transform attributions into uniform graph representations, providing a common ground for comparison across different explanation methods. We present a novel topology-driven visual analytics tool, Mountaineer, that allows ML practitioners to interactively analyze and compare these representations by linking the topological graphs back to the original data distribution, model predictions, and feature attributions. Mountaineer facilitates rapid and iterative exploration of ML explanations, enabling experts to gain deeper insights into the explanation techniques, understand the underlying data distributions, and thus reach well-founded conclusions about model behavior. Furthermore, we demonstrate the utility of Mountaineer through two case studies using real-world data. In the first, we show how Mountaineer enabled us to compare black-box ML explanations and discern regions of and causes of disagreements between different explanations. In the second, we demonstrate how the tool can be used to compare and understand ML models themselves. Finally, we conducted interviews with three industry experts to help us evaluate our work.
MOUNTAINEER:用于比较本地解释的拓扑驱动可视分析法
随着黑盒机器学习(ML)技术在关键应用中的使用越来越多,人们对能够为模型预测提供透明度和责任感的方法的需求也越来越大。因此,大量针对黑盒模型的局部可解释性方法得到了开发和推广。然而,由于一些方法的高维性、异质性、不同尺度和随机性,机器学习解释仍然难以评估和比较。拓扑数据分析(Topological Data Analysis,TDA)是这一领域的有效方法,因为它可以用来将归因转化为统一的图表示,为不同解释方法之间的比较提供共同基础。我们介绍了一种新颖的拓扑驱动可视化分析工具 Mountaineer,它允许人工智能从业人员通过将拓扑图与原始数据分布、模型预测和特征归因联系起来,以交互方式分析和比较这些表示。登山者有助于对 ML 解释进行快速、反复的探索,使专家能够深入了解解释技术,理解基本数据分布,从而对模型行为得出有理有据的结论。此外,我们还通过两个使用真实世界数据的案例研究展示了 Mountaineer 的实用性。在第一个案例中,我们展示了登山者如何帮助我们比较黑盒子 ML 解释,并找出不同解释之间存在分歧的区域和原因。其次,我们展示了如何使用该工具来比较和理解 ML 模型本身。最后,我们对三位行业专家进行了访谈,以帮助我们评估自己的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信