Battle Fatigue: Parents, Institutionalized Ableism, and the “Fight” for Inclusive Education

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Priya Lalvani, Eileen Osieja
{"title":"Battle Fatigue: Parents, Institutionalized Ableism, and the “Fight” for Inclusive Education","authors":"Priya Lalvani, Eileen Osieja","doi":"10.1177/15407969241259365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This qualitative study examined the experiences of parents who sought inclusive education for their children with intellectual disabilities or extensive support needs. Data were collected from 33 participants in the form of narratives that emerged through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using a phenomenological methodology. Findings revealed the existence of problematic special education practices and illuminated the mechanisms through which ability-based segregation in schools is institutionally sanctioned. Many parents reported that placement in a general education environment with the provision of support was not considered by professionals at their children’s Individualized Education Program (IEP) meetings. Instead, they were informed that education in separate classrooms was in their children’s best interest. Parents pushed back and advocated for access and inclusivity, often investing immense amounts of time and resources toward this end. The findings shed light on special education discourses that are entrenched in ableist notions about disability and uphold an implicit ideology of separate but equal for students with certain disabilities.","PeriodicalId":47213,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969241259365","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This qualitative study examined the experiences of parents who sought inclusive education for their children with intellectual disabilities or extensive support needs. Data were collected from 33 participants in the form of narratives that emerged through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using a phenomenological methodology. Findings revealed the existence of problematic special education practices and illuminated the mechanisms through which ability-based segregation in schools is institutionally sanctioned. Many parents reported that placement in a general education environment with the provision of support was not considered by professionals at their children’s Individualized Education Program (IEP) meetings. Instead, they were informed that education in separate classrooms was in their children’s best interest. Parents pushed back and advocated for access and inclusivity, often investing immense amounts of time and resources toward this end. The findings shed light on special education discourses that are entrenched in ableist notions about disability and uphold an implicit ideology of separate but equal for students with certain disabilities.
战斗疲劳:家长、制度化的能力歧视以及为全纳教育而 "战斗"
这项定性研究探讨了为智障子女或有广泛支助需求的子女寻求全纳教育的家长的经历。通过半结构式访谈,以叙述的形式收集了 33 名参与者的数据,并采用现象学方法对数据进行了分析。研究结果揭示了存在问题的特殊教育实践,并阐明了学校中基于能力的隔离得到制度认可的机制。许多家长报告说,在他们孩子的个性化教育计划(IEP)会议上,专业人员并没有考虑将他们安置在普通教育环境中并提供支持。相反,他们被告知,在单独的教室接受教育最符合其子女的利益。家长们奋起反击,倡导无障碍和全纳教育,往往为此投入了大量的时间和资源。研究结果揭示了特殊教育话语中根深蒂固的残疾能力主义观念,以及对某些残疾学生坚持 "隔离但平等 "的隐性意识形态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
20
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信