Mabood Farhadi Machekposhti, Brian G. Leib, Shuhua Xie, Tyson B. Raper, Timothy James Grant
{"title":"Irrigation termination has the potential to improve cotton yield and quality on different soil types","authors":"Mabood Farhadi Machekposhti, Brian G. Leib, Shuhua Xie, Tyson B. Raper, Timothy James Grant","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Irrigation termination timing is challenging for cotton producers in humid regions, especially for fields with varying soil types. A field experiment was conducted in Jackson, TN, to investigate the best cotton irrigation termination on different soil types. The water management treatments consisted of rainfed conditions (RF) and terminating irrigation 2 weeks before the first crack boll (ITBC1 and ITBC2), at the first crack boll (ITC1 and ITC2), and 2 weeks after the first cracked boll (ITAC1 and ITAC2). The irrigation rates consisted of normal irrigation (2) and increased irrigation (1) during the 2 weeks prior to irrigation termination. Irrigation treatments were implemented on three soils: a low, an intermediate, and a high available water-holding capacity (AWHC) soil. In sandy soil, seed yield increased by 127% in 2015 with the ITAC1 treatment and by 313% in 2016 with the ITC1 treatment, compared to the control (RF). These treatments were also found to be optimal for lint yield and irrigation water productivity in their respective years. The high AWHC soil did not require any irrigation in either growing season to optimize yield. In fact, irrigating at a high rate at every termination date caused yield loss in 2015. These results indicate that cotton can benefit from later termination and higher irrigation rates when soil water and rainfall are low at the end of the growing season or be harmed when the opposite is true.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 4","pages":"1828-1843"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21616","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Irrigation termination timing is challenging for cotton producers in humid regions, especially for fields with varying soil types. A field experiment was conducted in Jackson, TN, to investigate the best cotton irrigation termination on different soil types. The water management treatments consisted of rainfed conditions (RF) and terminating irrigation 2 weeks before the first crack boll (ITBC1 and ITBC2), at the first crack boll (ITC1 and ITC2), and 2 weeks after the first cracked boll (ITAC1 and ITAC2). The irrigation rates consisted of normal irrigation (2) and increased irrigation (1) during the 2 weeks prior to irrigation termination. Irrigation treatments were implemented on three soils: a low, an intermediate, and a high available water-holding capacity (AWHC) soil. In sandy soil, seed yield increased by 127% in 2015 with the ITAC1 treatment and by 313% in 2016 with the ITC1 treatment, compared to the control (RF). These treatments were also found to be optimal for lint yield and irrigation water productivity in their respective years. The high AWHC soil did not require any irrigation in either growing season to optimize yield. In fact, irrigating at a high rate at every termination date caused yield loss in 2015. These results indicate that cotton can benefit from later termination and higher irrigation rates when soil water and rainfall are low at the end of the growing season or be harmed when the opposite is true.
期刊介绍:
After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture.
Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.