Combining AMMI and BLUP analysis to select high-yielding soybean genotypes in Benin

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Eric Etchikinto Agoyi, Symphorien Essèdjlo Ahomondji, Pierrot Lionel Yemadje, Sergino Ayi, Lalaina Ranaivoson, Guilherme Martin Torres, Michelle da Fonseca Santos, Stéphane Boulakia, Godfree Chigeza, Achille E. Assogbadjo, Brian Diers, Brice Sinsin
{"title":"Combining AMMI and BLUP analysis to select high-yielding soybean genotypes in Benin","authors":"Eric Etchikinto Agoyi,&nbsp;Symphorien Essèdjlo Ahomondji,&nbsp;Pierrot Lionel Yemadje,&nbsp;Sergino Ayi,&nbsp;Lalaina Ranaivoson,&nbsp;Guilherme Martin Torres,&nbsp;Michelle da Fonseca Santos,&nbsp;Stéphane Boulakia,&nbsp;Godfree Chigeza,&nbsp;Achille E. Assogbadjo,&nbsp;Brian Diers,&nbsp;Brice Sinsin","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Thirty soybean [<i>Glycine max</i> (L.) Merr.] genotypes, along with three checks, were evaluated over three seasons across five communes in Benin. The experiments were laid out in an alpha lattice design with three replicates. Additive multiplicative mean interaction (AMMI) and best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) analysis were combined to assess differential agronomic performance and yield stability among genotypes. There was significant variation (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) between genotypes for all traits, with highly significant environmental and genotype × environment interaction (GEI) effects on soybean grain yield (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The likelihood ratio test indicated that both genotype and interaction effects were highly significant (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The low <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> (0.21) for GEI reflected the presence of high residual variation in the GEI component, in contrast to the AMMI analysis of variance, which explained a high proportion of the GEI through the first two interaction principal component axes (52%). The very high value of the predictive accuracy (0.89) confirmed the model's reliability in selecting superior genotypes. The low (0.33) genotypic correlation between environments indicated that it was difficult to select superior genotypes for each environment. Based on the superiority index (weighted average absolute scores from BLUP for yield) of BLUP, simultaneous selection led to the identification of Jenguma 2.67 ± 0.06 t ha<sup>−1</sup> as the most stable and productive genotype across environments, followed by Favour 2.34 ± 0.08 t ha<sup>−1</sup>, and Afayak 2.46 ± 0.08 t ha<sup>−1</sup>. The agronomic performance of soybean in this study suggested great potential for diversifying cotton-based cropping systems in Benin, thereby improving their sustainability. The effect of these soybean genotypes on the productivity of intercrop combinations and sequences of cash crops, such as cotton, is yet to be investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 5","pages":"2109-2128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21615","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thirty soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] genotypes, along with three checks, were evaluated over three seasons across five communes in Benin. The experiments were laid out in an alpha lattice design with three replicates. Additive multiplicative mean interaction (AMMI) and best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) analysis were combined to assess differential agronomic performance and yield stability among genotypes. There was significant variation (p < 0.001) between genotypes for all traits, with highly significant environmental and genotype × environment interaction (GEI) effects on soybean grain yield (p < 0.001). The likelihood ratio test indicated that both genotype and interaction effects were highly significant (p < 0.001). The low R2 (0.21) for GEI reflected the presence of high residual variation in the GEI component, in contrast to the AMMI analysis of variance, which explained a high proportion of the GEI through the first two interaction principal component axes (52%). The very high value of the predictive accuracy (0.89) confirmed the model's reliability in selecting superior genotypes. The low (0.33) genotypic correlation between environments indicated that it was difficult to select superior genotypes for each environment. Based on the superiority index (weighted average absolute scores from BLUP for yield) of BLUP, simultaneous selection led to the identification of Jenguma 2.67 ± 0.06 t ha−1 as the most stable and productive genotype across environments, followed by Favour 2.34 ± 0.08 t ha−1, and Afayak 2.46 ± 0.08 t ha−1. The agronomic performance of soybean in this study suggested great potential for diversifying cotton-based cropping systems in Benin, thereby improving their sustainability. The effect of these soybean genotypes on the productivity of intercrop combinations and sequences of cash crops, such as cotton, is yet to be investigated.

结合 AMMI 和 BLUP 分析,选择贝宁的高产大豆基因型
在贝宁的五个乡,对 30 个大豆 [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] 基因型和三个对照进行了三季评估。实验采用阿尔法网格设计,有三个重复。结合加法乘法平均交互作用(AMMI)和最佳线性无偏预测因子(BLUP)分析,对不同基因型的农艺性能和产量稳定性进行了评估。基因型之间的所有性状均存在显著差异(p < 0.001),环境和基因型 × 环境交互作用(GEI)对大豆谷物产量的影响非常显著(p < 0.001)。似然比检验表明,基因型效应和互作效应都非常显著(p < 0.001)。GEI 的 R2 较低(0.21),反映了 GEI 成分中存在较高的残差,这与 AMMI 方差分析形成鲜明对比,后者通过前两个互作主成分轴解释了较高比例的 GEI(52%)。极高的预测准确度值(0.89)证实了该模型在选择优良基因型方面的可靠性。环境之间的基因型相关性较低(0.33),这表明很难为每种环境筛选出优良基因型。根据 BLUP 的优越性指数(BLUP 在产量方面的加权平均绝对值),同步选择确定了 Jenguma 2.67 ± 0.06 吨/公顷-1 为跨环境最稳定、最高产的基因型,其次是 Favour 2.34 ± 0.08 吨/公顷-1 和 Afayak 2.46 ± 0.08 吨/公顷-1。本研究中大豆的农艺表现表明,它在贝宁棉花种植系统多样化方面具有巨大潜力,从而提高了种植系统的可持续性。这些大豆基因型对经济作物(如棉花)间作组合和序列生产力的影响还有待研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信