Reformulation of dicamba herbicide: Impacts on offsite transport and soybean damage

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Caleb R. Hammer, Timothy J. Griffis, John M. Baker, Pamela J. Rice, Lara E. Frankson, Jeffrey L. Gunsolus, Matthew D. Erickson, Ke Xiao, Aarti P. Mistry, Debalin Sarangi
{"title":"Reformulation of dicamba herbicide: Impacts on offsite transport and soybean damage","authors":"Caleb R. Hammer,&nbsp;Timothy J. Griffis,&nbsp;John M. Baker,&nbsp;Pamela J. Rice,&nbsp;Lara E. Frankson,&nbsp;Jeffrey L. Gunsolus,&nbsp;Matthew D. Erickson,&nbsp;Ke Xiao,&nbsp;Aarti P. Mistry,&nbsp;Debalin Sarangi","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The herbicide dicamba (3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid) is commonly used to control broadleaf weeds in soybeans. Dicamba, however, is susceptible to volatilization and drift, thereby causing significant plant damage to nontarget crops downwind. Dicamba was reformulated to reduce volatility and off-target movement. The effectiveness of the dicamba reformulation was assessed by quantifying dicamba emissions following spray application and investigated how meteorological factors influenced the off-target movement. The experiments were conducted at the University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station (UMORE Park) during the growing season of 2018, 2019, 2021, and 2022. Multiple high-flow polyurethane foam air samplers were used to measure dicamba concentrations downwind from a 4-ha soybean field sprayed with dicamba. Dicamba emissions were estimated using backward Lagrangian modeling constrained by the air sample observations. The results indicate that dicamba emissions and downwind transport were significant for several days following application. Further, non-traited soybeans located within 15–45 m showed substantial dicamba-related damage. In warmer, drier seasons, increased dicamba emissions caused more severe damage to downwind soybeans, likely worsened by drought stress preventing recovery. Favorable atmospheric conditions that reduced potential drift can be difficult to achieve in terms of the typical weather experienced over agricultural sites in the Upper Midwest. These results indicate that the dicamba reformulation has not adequately prevented significant post-spray volatilization losses and downwind transport.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 5","pages":"2200-2216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21630","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21630","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The herbicide dicamba (3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid) is commonly used to control broadleaf weeds in soybeans. Dicamba, however, is susceptible to volatilization and drift, thereby causing significant plant damage to nontarget crops downwind. Dicamba was reformulated to reduce volatility and off-target movement. The effectiveness of the dicamba reformulation was assessed by quantifying dicamba emissions following spray application and investigated how meteorological factors influenced the off-target movement. The experiments were conducted at the University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station (UMORE Park) during the growing season of 2018, 2019, 2021, and 2022. Multiple high-flow polyurethane foam air samplers were used to measure dicamba concentrations downwind from a 4-ha soybean field sprayed with dicamba. Dicamba emissions were estimated using backward Lagrangian modeling constrained by the air sample observations. The results indicate that dicamba emissions and downwind transport were significant for several days following application. Further, non-traited soybeans located within 15–45 m showed substantial dicamba-related damage. In warmer, drier seasons, increased dicamba emissions caused more severe damage to downwind soybeans, likely worsened by drought stress preventing recovery. Favorable atmospheric conditions that reduced potential drift can be difficult to achieve in terms of the typical weather experienced over agricultural sites in the Upper Midwest. These results indicate that the dicamba reformulation has not adequately prevented significant post-spray volatilization losses and downwind transport.

Abstract Image

麦草畏除草剂的重新配制:对异地运输和大豆损害的影响
除草剂麦草畏(3,6-二氯-2-甲氧基苯甲酸)常用于控制大豆中的阔叶杂草。然而,麦草畏容易挥发和漂移,从而对下风向的非目标作物造成严重的植物损害。对麦草畏进行了重新配制,以减少挥发性和非目标移动。通过量化麦草畏在喷洒后的排放量,评估了麦草畏改良配方的效果,并研究了气象因素对非目标移动的影响。实验于 2018 年、2019 年、2021 年和 2022 年的生长季节在明尼苏达大学农业试验站(UMORE Park)进行。使用多个高流量聚氨酯泡沫空气采样器测量喷洒了麦草畏的 4 公顷大豆田下风向的麦草畏浓度。在空气样本观测结果的约束下,使用后向拉格朗日模型估算麦草畏的排放量。结果表明,在喷洒麦草畏后的几天内,麦草畏的排放量和下风迁移量都很大。此外,位于 15-45 米范围内的无麦草畏大豆也受到了严重的麦草畏相关损害。在温暖干燥的季节,麦草畏排放量的增加会对下风向的大豆造成更严重的损害,而干旱压力可能会阻碍大豆的恢复。在上中西部农业区的典型天气条件下,很难实现减少潜在漂移的有利大气条件。这些结果表明,麦草畏改良配方并没有充分防止大量的喷洒后挥发损失和下风向迁移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信