System response curve based first-order optimization algorithms for cyber-physical-social intelligence

IF 1.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Biyuan Yao, Qingchen Zhang, Ruonan Feng, Xiaokang Wang
{"title":"System response curve based first-order optimization algorithms for cyber-physical-social intelligence","authors":"Biyuan Yao,&nbsp;Qingchen Zhang,&nbsp;Ruonan Feng,&nbsp;Xiaokang Wang","doi":"10.1002/cpe.8197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The continuous enhancement of optimization algorithms and their parameters has spurred the expansion of AI into novel application domains such as image recognition and smart home technology. This paper employs the system response curve (SRC) to the adaptive learning rate optimizer, addressing challenges associated with the establishment of the optimizer control model and parameter adjustments affecting the dynamic performance of the system. These insights offer theoretical support for the optimizer's application in deep learning models. To begin, the adaptive learning rate optimizer is a time-varying system. Based on the intrinsic relationship between the network optimization and the control system, the time domain expression and approximate transfer function of the adaptive learning rate optimizer are derived, and the system dynamic model is established. Furthermore, based on the system control model of the optimizer, it is proposed to explain the performance impacts of different optimizers and their hyperparameters on the deep learning model through the SRC. Finally, experiments are performed on the MNIST, CIFAR-10, UTKinect-Action3D, and Florence3D-Action datasets to validate the control theory of explaining optimizers through system response curves. The experimental results show that the recognition performance of the Adaptive Moment Estimate (Adam) is better than that of the Adaptive Gradient (AdaGrad) and Root Mean Square Propagation (RMSprop). Additionally, the learning rate affects the model training speed, and the practical application aligns with the theoretical analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":55214,"journal":{"name":"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience","volume":"36 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpe.8197","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The continuous enhancement of optimization algorithms and their parameters has spurred the expansion of AI into novel application domains such as image recognition and smart home technology. This paper employs the system response curve (SRC) to the adaptive learning rate optimizer, addressing challenges associated with the establishment of the optimizer control model and parameter adjustments affecting the dynamic performance of the system. These insights offer theoretical support for the optimizer's application in deep learning models. To begin, the adaptive learning rate optimizer is a time-varying system. Based on the intrinsic relationship between the network optimization and the control system, the time domain expression and approximate transfer function of the adaptive learning rate optimizer are derived, and the system dynamic model is established. Furthermore, based on the system control model of the optimizer, it is proposed to explain the performance impacts of different optimizers and their hyperparameters on the deep learning model through the SRC. Finally, experiments are performed on the MNIST, CIFAR-10, UTKinect-Action3D, and Florence3D-Action datasets to validate the control theory of explaining optimizers through system response curves. The experimental results show that the recognition performance of the Adaptive Moment Estimate (Adam) is better than that of the Adaptive Gradient (AdaGrad) and Root Mean Square Propagation (RMSprop). Additionally, the learning rate affects the model training speed, and the practical application aligns with the theoretical analysis.

基于系统响应曲线的网络物理社会智能一阶优化算法
优化算法及其参数的不断改进推动了人工智能向图像识别和智能家居技术等新应用领域的扩展。本文将系统响应曲线(SRC)应用于自适应学习率优化器,解决了与优化器控制模型的建立和影响系统动态性能的参数调整相关的难题。这些见解为优化器在深度学习模型中的应用提供了理论支持。首先,自适应学习率优化器是一个时变系统。基于网络优化与控制系统之间的内在关系,推导出自适应学习率优化器的时域表达式和近似传递函数,并建立了系统动态模型。此外,基于优化器的系统控制模型,提出通过 SRC 解释不同优化器及其超参数对深度学习模型的性能影响。最后,在 MNIST、CIFAR-10、UTKinect-Action3D 和 Florence3D-Action 数据集上进行了实验,验证了通过系统响应曲线解释优化器的控制理论。实验结果表明,自适应矩估计(Adam)的识别性能优于自适应梯度(AdaGrad)和均方根传播(RMSprop)。此外,学习率也会影响模型的训练速度,实际应用与理论分析相吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience
Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
664
审稿时长
9.6 months
期刊介绍: Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience (CCPE) publishes high-quality, original research papers, and authoritative research review papers, in the overlapping fields of: Parallel and distributed computing; High-performance computing; Computational and data science; Artificial intelligence and machine learning; Big data applications, algorithms, and systems; Network science; Ontologies and semantics; Security and privacy; Cloud/edge/fog computing; Green computing; and Quantum computing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信