Neural correlates of preschoolers’ passive-viewing false belief: Insights into continuity and change and the function of right temporoparietal activity in theory of mind development

IF 3.1 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Lindsay C. Bowman, Amanda C. Brandone
{"title":"Neural correlates of preschoolers’ passive-viewing false belief: Insights into continuity and change and the function of right temporoparietal activity in theory of mind development","authors":"Lindsay C. Bowman,&nbsp;Amanda C. Brandone","doi":"10.1111/desc.13530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Behavioral research demonstrates a critical transition in preschooler's mental-state understanding (i.e., theory of mind; ToM), revealed most starkly in performance on tasks about a character's false belief (e.g., about an object's location). Questions remain regarding the neural and cognitive processes differentiating children who pass versus fail behavioral false-belief tasks and the extent to which there is continuity versus change in the ToM neural network. To address these questions, we analyzed event-related spectral power in the electroencephalogram (EEG) to investigate how preschoolers’ neural activity during passive viewing of false-belief scenarios related to their explicit behavioral ToM performance. We found that neural activity during passive viewing of false-belief events (6–9 Hz EEG ‘alpha’ suppression in right temporoparietal [RTP] electrodes) strongly related to children's explicit ToM. However, children's RTP alpha suppression differed depending on their explicit behavioral ToM performance: Children who did better on a broad battery of standard ToM tasks and who passed explicit behavioral false-belief tasks showed greater RTP alpha suppression when the character's belief first became false (during the ‘location-change’ event); whereas children who did worse on the ToM battery and who failed explicit behavioral false-belief tasks showed greater RTP alpha suppression only later when they could evaluate the character's behavior in the context of prior events (during the ‘active-search’ event). Findings shed light on what differentiates preschoolers who pass versus fail explicit false-belief tasks and raise questions about how to interpret existing neuroscience data from ToM tasks across infancy to adulthood.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Preschool children's neural activity (EEG 6–9 Hz suppression in right temporoparietal [RTP] electrodes) during passive-viewing of false-belief events was related to their explicit behavioral theory-of-mind performance.</li>\n \n <li>Children who did better on a theory-of-mind (ToM) battery and passed explicit false-belief tasks showed greater RTP alpha suppression when the character's belief first became false.</li>\n \n <li>Children who performed worse on the ToM battery and failed explicit false-belief tasks showed greater RTP alpha suppression later when observing the character's search behavior.</li>\n \n <li>Findings reveal change in preschoolers’ ToM neural correlates and suggest that the presence of RTP activity does not necessarily indicate ‘mature’ theory of mind.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/desc.13530","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.13530","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Behavioral research demonstrates a critical transition in preschooler's mental-state understanding (i.e., theory of mind; ToM), revealed most starkly in performance on tasks about a character's false belief (e.g., about an object's location). Questions remain regarding the neural and cognitive processes differentiating children who pass versus fail behavioral false-belief tasks and the extent to which there is continuity versus change in the ToM neural network. To address these questions, we analyzed event-related spectral power in the electroencephalogram (EEG) to investigate how preschoolers’ neural activity during passive viewing of false-belief scenarios related to their explicit behavioral ToM performance. We found that neural activity during passive viewing of false-belief events (6–9 Hz EEG ‘alpha’ suppression in right temporoparietal [RTP] electrodes) strongly related to children's explicit ToM. However, children's RTP alpha suppression differed depending on their explicit behavioral ToM performance: Children who did better on a broad battery of standard ToM tasks and who passed explicit behavioral false-belief tasks showed greater RTP alpha suppression when the character's belief first became false (during the ‘location-change’ event); whereas children who did worse on the ToM battery and who failed explicit behavioral false-belief tasks showed greater RTP alpha suppression only later when they could evaluate the character's behavior in the context of prior events (during the ‘active-search’ event). Findings shed light on what differentiates preschoolers who pass versus fail explicit false-belief tasks and raise questions about how to interpret existing neuroscience data from ToM tasks across infancy to adulthood.

Research Highlights

  • Preschool children's neural activity (EEG 6–9 Hz suppression in right temporoparietal [RTP] electrodes) during passive-viewing of false-belief events was related to their explicit behavioral theory-of-mind performance.
  • Children who did better on a theory-of-mind (ToM) battery and passed explicit false-belief tasks showed greater RTP alpha suppression when the character's belief first became false.
  • Children who performed worse on the ToM battery and failed explicit false-belief tasks showed greater RTP alpha suppression later when observing the character's search behavior.
  • Findings reveal change in preschoolers’ ToM neural correlates and suggest that the presence of RTP activity does not necessarily indicate ‘mature’ theory of mind.

Abstract Image

学龄前儿童被动观察错误信念的神经相关性:洞察连续性和变化以及右侧颞顶叶活动在心智理论发展中的功能
行为学研究表明,学龄前儿童对心理状态的理解(即心智理论;ToM)正处于一个关键的过渡阶段,这一点在有关角色错误信念(如有关物体位置的错误信念)的任务中表现得最为明显。关于区分儿童通过与未通过虚假信念行为任务的神经和认知过程,以及 ToM 神经网络的连续性与变化程度,仍然存在一些问题。为了解决这些问题,我们分析了脑电图(EEG)中与事件相关的频谱功率,以研究学龄前儿童在被动观看虚假信念场景时的神经活动与其明确的行为 ToM 表现之间的关系。我们发现,被动观看虚假信念事件时的神经活动(右侧颞顶叶 [RTP] 电极的 6-9 Hz 脑电图 "α "抑制)与儿童的显性 ToM 密切相关。然而,儿童的 RTP α抑制因其显性行为 ToM 表现而异:在一系列广泛的标准 ToM 任务中表现较好并通过了明确的行为假信念任务的儿童,在角色的信念首次变为错误时("位置改变 "事件期间)表现出更大的 RTP α抑制;而在 ToM 任务中表现较差且未通过明确的行为假信念任务的儿童,只有在他们能够根据之前的事件评估角色的行为时("主动搜索 "事件期间),才表现出更大的 RTP α抑制。研究亮点 学龄前儿童在被动观看虚假信念事件时的神经活动(右侧颞顶叶 [RTP] 电极的脑电图 6-9 Hz 抑制)与他们的明确行为心智理论表现有关。在心智理论(ToM)测试中表现较好并通过了明确的错误信念任务的儿童,在角色的信念首次变为错误时表现出更强的 RTP α抑制。在心智理论(ToM)测试中表现较差且未通过明确的错误信念任务的儿童,在观察角色的搜索行为时会表现出更强的 RTP α抑制。研究结果揭示了学龄前儿童心智理论神经相关因素的变化,并表明 RTP 活动的存在并不一定代表心智理论的 "成熟"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: Developmental Science publishes cutting-edge theory and up-to-the-minute research on scientific developmental psychology from leading thinkers in the field. It is currently the only journal that specifically focuses on human developmental cognitive neuroscience. Coverage includes: - Clinical, computational and comparative approaches to development - Key advances in cognitive and social development - Developmental cognitive neuroscience - Functional neuroimaging of the developing brain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信