Effect of patient specificity on predicting knee cartilage degeneration in obese adults: Musculoskeletal finite-element modeling of data from the CAROT trial

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Gustavo A. Orozco, Lauri Stenroth, Amir Esrafilian, Petri Tanska, Mika E. Mononen, Marius Henriksen, Tine Alkjær, Rami K. Korhonen, Hanna Isaksson
{"title":"Effect of patient specificity on predicting knee cartilage degeneration in obese adults: Musculoskeletal finite-element modeling of data from the CAROT trial","authors":"Gustavo A. Orozco,&nbsp;Lauri Stenroth,&nbsp;Amir Esrafilian,&nbsp;Petri Tanska,&nbsp;Mika E. Mononen,&nbsp;Marius Henriksen,&nbsp;Tine Alkjær,&nbsp;Rami K. Korhonen,&nbsp;Hanna Isaksson","doi":"10.1002/jor.25912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n <p>Obesity is a known risk factor for development of osteoarthritis (OA). Numerical tools like finite-element (FE) models combined with degenerative algorithms have been developed to understand the interplay between OA and obesity. In this study, we aimed to predict knee cartilage degeneration in a cohort of obese adults to investigate the importance of patient-specific information on degeneration predictions. We used a validated FE modeling approach and three different age-dependent functions (step-wise, exponential, and linear) to simulate cartilage degradation under overloading in the knee joint. Gait motion analysis and magnetic resonance imaging data from 115 obese individuals with knee OA were used for musculoskeletal and FE modeling. Cartilage degeneration predictions were contrasted with Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) and Boston–Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score (BLOKS) grades. The findings show that overall, the similarities between numerical predictions and clinical measures were better for the medial (average area under the curve (AUC) = 0.62) compared to the lateral compartment (average AUC = 0.52) of the knee. Classification results for KL grades, full patient-specific models and patient-specific geometry with generic gait data showed higher AUC values (AUC = 0.71 and AUC = 0.68, respectively) compared to generic geometry and patient-specific gait (AUC = 0.48). For BLOKS grades, AUC values for both full patient-specific models and for patient-specific geometry with generic gait locomotion were higher (AUC  = 0.66 and AUC = 0.64, respectively) compared to when the generic geometry and patient-specific gait were used (AUC = 0.53). In summary, our study highlights the importance of considering individual information in knee OA prediction. Nevertheless, our findings suggest that personalized gait play a smaller role in the OA prediction and classification capacity than personalized joint geometry.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jor.25912","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jor.25912","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Obesity is a known risk factor for development of osteoarthritis (OA). Numerical tools like finite-element (FE) models combined with degenerative algorithms have been developed to understand the interplay between OA and obesity. In this study, we aimed to predict knee cartilage degeneration in a cohort of obese adults to investigate the importance of patient-specific information on degeneration predictions. We used a validated FE modeling approach and three different age-dependent functions (step-wise, exponential, and linear) to simulate cartilage degradation under overloading in the knee joint. Gait motion analysis and magnetic resonance imaging data from 115 obese individuals with knee OA were used for musculoskeletal and FE modeling. Cartilage degeneration predictions were contrasted with Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) and Boston–Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score (BLOKS) grades. The findings show that overall, the similarities between numerical predictions and clinical measures were better for the medial (average area under the curve (AUC) = 0.62) compared to the lateral compartment (average AUC = 0.52) of the knee. Classification results for KL grades, full patient-specific models and patient-specific geometry with generic gait data showed higher AUC values (AUC = 0.71 and AUC = 0.68, respectively) compared to generic geometry and patient-specific gait (AUC = 0.48). For BLOKS grades, AUC values for both full patient-specific models and for patient-specific geometry with generic gait locomotion were higher (AUC  = 0.66 and AUC = 0.64, respectively) compared to when the generic geometry and patient-specific gait were used (AUC = 0.53). In summary, our study highlights the importance of considering individual information in knee OA prediction. Nevertheless, our findings suggest that personalized gait play a smaller role in the OA prediction and classification capacity than personalized joint geometry.

患者特异性对预测肥胖成人膝关节软骨退化的影响:对 CAROT 试验数据进行肌肉骨骼有限元建模
肥胖是已知的骨关节炎(OA)发病风险因素。为了了解 OA 与肥胖之间的相互作用,人们开发了结合退化算法的有限元(FE)模型等数值工具。在这项研究中,我们旨在预测一组肥胖成年人的膝关节软骨退变情况,以研究特定患者信息对退变预测的重要性。我们使用经过验证的有限元建模方法和三种不同的年龄相关函数(步进、指数和线性)来模拟膝关节过载下的软骨退化。步态运动分析和磁共振成像数据来自 115 名患有膝关节 OA 的肥胖患者,用于肌肉骨骼和 FE 建模。软骨退化预测结果与凯尔格伦-劳伦斯(KL)和波士顿-利兹骨关节炎膝关节评分(BLOKS)进行了对比。研究结果表明,总体而言,膝关节内侧(平均曲线下面积(AUC)= 0.62)与外侧(平均曲线下面积(AUC)= 0.52)相比,数值预测与临床测量之间的相似度更高。与通用几何和患者特定步态(AUC = 0.48)相比,KL等级、完整患者特定模型和患者特定几何与通用步态数据的分类结果显示出更高的AUC值(AUC = 0.71和AUC = 0.68)。对于 BLOKS 分级,与使用通用几何体和患者特异性步态(AUC = 0.53)相比,完整的患者特异性模型和患者特异性几何体与通用步态运动的 AUC 值更高(AUC = 0.66 和 AUC = 0.64)。总之,我们的研究强调了在膝关节 OA 预测中考虑个体信息的重要性。然而,我们的研究结果表明,与个性化关节几何形状相比,个性化步态在 OA 预测和分类能力中的作用较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Journal of Orthopaedic Research® 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Research is the forum for the rapid publication of high quality reports of new information on the full spectrum of orthopaedic research, including life sciences, engineering, translational, and clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信