Management of massive haemorrhage in transfusion medicine services in the Middle East and North Africa

Abstract

Background and ObjectivesMassive transfusion protocols (MTPs) are critical in managing haemorrhage, yet their utilization varies. There is lack of data on the utilization of MTPs in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. This study aims to assess the degree of utilization of MTPs in the region.Materials and MethodsWe conducted a survey to collect data on MTP use, inviting medical directors of transfusion services from various hospitals. Data were analysed to determine the prevalence of MTP utilization, their compositions, challenges in application and areas of future need.ResultsEighteen respondents participated, representing 11 countries in the region. Thirteen hospitals implemented MTP, and eight included paediatrics. Eleven institutions used more than one definition of massive haemorrhage, with the most common being ≥10 red blood cell (RBC) units transfused for adults and replacement of >50% total blood volume in paediatrics. The majority of sites with MTPs utilized 1:1:1 RBCs:platelets:plasma ratio (70%). Variations were observed in the types and blood groups of components used. Two sites utilized whole blood, while six are considering it for future use. Utilization of adjunctive agents and frequency of laboratory testing varied among the sites. Challenges included the lack of medical expertise in protocol development, adherence and paediatric application. The need assessment emphasized the need for developing regional guidelines, standardized protocols and training initiatives.ConclusionAlthough several hospitals have adopted MTPs, variations exist in activation criteria, blood product ratios and monitoring. Challenges include the lack of medical expertise, protocol adherence and addressing paediatric needs. Standardizing protocols, enhancing training and paediatric application are crucial for improving massive transfusion management in the region.