Hao Sun;Yu Du;Ching-Ni Lin;Han Jiang;Wenbo Huang;Pai-Yi Chiu;Guang-Uei Hung;Lijun Lu;Greta S. P. Mok
{"title":"Cross-Tracer and Cross-Scanner Transfer Learning-Based Attenuation Correction for Brain SPECT","authors":"Hao Sun;Yu Du;Ching-Ni Lin;Han Jiang;Wenbo Huang;Pai-Yi Chiu;Guang-Uei Hung;Lijun Lu;Greta S. P. Mok","doi":"10.1109/TRPMS.2024.3374207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to investigate robust attenuation correction (AC) by generating attenuation maps \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$(\\mu $ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n-maps) from nonattenuation-corrected (NAC) brain SPECT data using transfer learning (TL). Four sets of brain SPECT data (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$4\\times 30$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n) were retrospectively collected: S-TRODAT-1, S-ECD, G-TRODAT-1, and G-ECD. A 3-D attention-based conditional generative adversarial network was pretrained using 22 paired 3-D NAC SPECT images and corresponding CT \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\mu $ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n-maps for four patient groups. Various numbers (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$n\\,\\,=$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n 4–22) of paired NAC SPECT and corresponding \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>$\\mu $ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n-maps from S-TRODAT-1 were then used to fine-tune (FT) the other three pretrained deep learning (DL) networks, i.e., S-ECD, G-TRODAT-1, and G-ECD. All patients in S-TRODAT-1 group were tested on their own network (DL-AC), and on the pretrained models with FT (FT-AC) and without FT (NFT-AC). The FT-AC methods used 22 (FT22), 12 (FT12), 8 (FT8), and 4 (FT4) paired data for FT, respectively. Our results show that FT22 and FT12 could outperform DL-AC for cross-tracer S-ECD and cross-scanner G-TRODAT-1 using CT-based AC (CT-AC) as the reference. FT22 also outperforms DL-AC for cross-tracer+cross-scanner G-ECD. FT8 performs comparably to DL-AC, while FT4 is worse than DL-AC but still better than NAC and NFT-AC in each group. Attenuation map generation is feasible for brain SPECT based on cross-tracer and/or cross-scanner FT-AC using a smaller number of patient data. The FT-AC performance improves as the number of data used for FT increases.","PeriodicalId":46807,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences","volume":"8 6","pages":"664-676"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10461117","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10461117/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aims to investigate robust attenuation correction (AC) by generating attenuation maps
$(\mu $
-maps) from nonattenuation-corrected (NAC) brain SPECT data using transfer learning (TL). Four sets of brain SPECT data (
$4\times 30$
) were retrospectively collected: S-TRODAT-1, S-ECD, G-TRODAT-1, and G-ECD. A 3-D attention-based conditional generative adversarial network was pretrained using 22 paired 3-D NAC SPECT images and corresponding CT
$\mu $
-maps for four patient groups. Various numbers (
$n\,\,=$
4–22) of paired NAC SPECT and corresponding
$\mu $
-maps from S-TRODAT-1 were then used to fine-tune (FT) the other three pretrained deep learning (DL) networks, i.e., S-ECD, G-TRODAT-1, and G-ECD. All patients in S-TRODAT-1 group were tested on their own network (DL-AC), and on the pretrained models with FT (FT-AC) and without FT (NFT-AC). The FT-AC methods used 22 (FT22), 12 (FT12), 8 (FT8), and 4 (FT4) paired data for FT, respectively. Our results show that FT22 and FT12 could outperform DL-AC for cross-tracer S-ECD and cross-scanner G-TRODAT-1 using CT-based AC (CT-AC) as the reference. FT22 also outperforms DL-AC for cross-tracer+cross-scanner G-ECD. FT8 performs comparably to DL-AC, while FT4 is worse than DL-AC but still better than NAC and NFT-AC in each group. Attenuation map generation is feasible for brain SPECT based on cross-tracer and/or cross-scanner FT-AC using a smaller number of patient data. The FT-AC performance improves as the number of data used for FT increases.