Differences in physical examination findings between those who present with or without headache soon after a whiplash injury: a cross-sectional study.

IF 1.6 Q2 REHABILITATION
E Anarte-Lazo, D Falla, V Devecchi, C Bernal-Utrera, C Rodriguez-Blanco
{"title":"Differences in physical examination findings between those who present with or without headache soon after a whiplash injury: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"E Anarte-Lazo, D Falla, V Devecchi, C Bernal-Utrera, C Rodriguez-Blanco","doi":"10.1080/10669817.2024.2372911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine differences in physical examination findings between people with acute whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) with and without headache.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, participants with acute WAD were evaluated to assess differences in the presence of physical impairments. The following were assessed: pain intensity on manual palpation the over spinous process of C1-C3, zygapophyseal joints of C0-C4, and trapezius, sternocleidomastoid, suboccipitalis, masseter and temporalis muscles; cervical range of motion (ROM); flexion-rotation test (FRT); forward head posture; cranio-cervical flexion test (CCFT); neck flexor and extensor endurance; pressure-pain thresholds (PPT) over neural structures and upper limb neural tests (ULNT) in addition to median UNLT + CCF. Correlation analyses were performed to assess the association between examination findings and headache intensity. Logistic regression and discriminant analyses were also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven participants (26 men and 21 women; mean age = 38.9 years old) were included in the study. 60% of the participants presented with headache. Several examination findings were significantly different between groups. A group of examination findings composed of neck endurance, manual palpation over cervical and muscular structures, PPT, CCFT, ROM and FRT could discriminate between groups with a sensitivity of 86.7% and specificity of 90%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Several neuromusculoskeletal features are different between people with acute WAD with or without headache. A combination of features could distinguish between groups with high levels of sensitivity and specificity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"619-629"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11578421/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2024.2372911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To determine differences in physical examination findings between people with acute whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) with and without headache.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, participants with acute WAD were evaluated to assess differences in the presence of physical impairments. The following were assessed: pain intensity on manual palpation the over spinous process of C1-C3, zygapophyseal joints of C0-C4, and trapezius, sternocleidomastoid, suboccipitalis, masseter and temporalis muscles; cervical range of motion (ROM); flexion-rotation test (FRT); forward head posture; cranio-cervical flexion test (CCFT); neck flexor and extensor endurance; pressure-pain thresholds (PPT) over neural structures and upper limb neural tests (ULNT) in addition to median UNLT + CCF. Correlation analyses were performed to assess the association between examination findings and headache intensity. Logistic regression and discriminant analyses were also performed.

Results: Forty-seven participants (26 men and 21 women; mean age = 38.9 years old) were included in the study. 60% of the participants presented with headache. Several examination findings were significantly different between groups. A group of examination findings composed of neck endurance, manual palpation over cervical and muscular structures, PPT, CCFT, ROM and FRT could discriminate between groups with a sensitivity of 86.7% and specificity of 90%.

Conclusions: Several neuromusculoskeletal features are different between people with acute WAD with or without headache. A combination of features could distinguish between groups with high levels of sensitivity and specificity.

鞭打受伤后不久出现头痛或无头痛者的体格检查结果差异:一项横断面研究。
目的:确定伴有头痛和不伴有头痛的急性鞭相关障碍(WAD)患者在体格检查结果上的差异:在这项横断面研究中,对患有急性 WAD 的参与者进行了评估,以确定他们在身体损伤方面的差异。评估内容如下手动触诊 C1-C3 棘突上方、C0-C4 颧骨关节、斜方肌、胸锁乳突肌、枕下肌、咀嚼肌和颞肌时的疼痛强度;颈椎活动范围(ROM);屈旋试验(FRT);除中位数 UNLT + CCF 外,还进行了颈部运动范围 (ROM)、屈旋试验 (FRT)、头前倾姿势、颅颈屈曲试验 (CCFT)、颈部屈肌和伸肌耐力、神经结构压痛阈值 (PPT) 和上肢神经试验 (ULNT)。为评估检查结果与头痛强度之间的关联性,进行了相关性分析。此外,还进行了逻辑回归和判别分析:研究共纳入 47 名参与者(26 名男性,21 名女性;平均年龄 = 38.9 岁)。60%的参与者有头痛症状。几项检查结果在组间存在明显差异。由颈部耐力、颈部和肌肉结构的手动触诊、PPT、CCFT、ROM 和 FRT 组成的一组检查结果可以区分不同组别,灵敏度为 86.7%,特异性为 90%:结论:伴有或不伴有头痛的急性 WAD 患者的一些神经-肌肉-骨骼特征是不同的。结论:一些神经肌肉骨骼特征在伴有或不伴有头痛的急性 WAD 患者之间存在差异,这些特征的组合能够以较高的灵敏度和特异性区分不同组别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research, case reports, and reviews of the literature that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of manual therapy, clinical research, therapeutic practice, and academic training. In addition, each issue features an editorial written by the editor or a guest editor, media reviews, thesis reviews, and abstracts of current literature. Areas of interest include: •Thrust and non-thrust manipulation •Neurodynamic assessment and treatment •Diagnostic accuracy and classification •Manual therapy-related interventions •Clinical decision-making processes •Understanding clinimetrics for the clinician
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信