The effects of acute versus repeated cannabidiol administration on trauma-relevant emotional reactivity: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
L Riley Gournay, Morgan L Ferretti, Anna-Marie Nguyen, Sarah Bilsky, Grant S Shields, Eric Mann, Parker Williams, Sydney Woychesin, Marcel Bonn-Miller, Ellen W Leen-Feldner
{"title":"The effects of acute versus repeated cannabidiol administration on trauma-relevant emotional reactivity: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.","authors":"L Riley Gournay, Morgan L Ferretti, Anna-Marie Nguyen, Sarah Bilsky, Grant S Shields, Eric Mann, Parker Williams, Sydney Woychesin, Marcel Bonn-Miller, Ellen W Leen-Feldner","doi":"10.1002/jts.23072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the widespread use and perceived efficacy of cannabidiol (CBD) as an anxiolytic, few controlled studies have evaluated the effects of CBD on anxiety-relevant indications, and only one has done so in the context of trauma-related symptoms. The current study was designed to address this gap in the literature. Participants were 42 trauma-exposed individuals (M<sub>age</sub> = 23.12 years, SD<sub>age</sub> = 6.61) who endorsed elevated stress. They were randomly assigned to take 300 mg of oral CBD or placebo daily for 1 week. Acute (i.e., following an initial 300 mg dose) and repeated (i.e., following 1 week of daily 300 mg dosing) effects of CBD were evaluated in relation to indicators of anxious arousal (i.e., anxiety, distress, heart rate) in response to idiographic trauma script presentation. The results of the current study suggest that relative to placebo, 300 mg CBD did not significantly reduce anxiety, B = 13.37, t(37) = 1.71, p = .096, d = 0.09, Bayes factor (BF<sub>10</sub>) = 0.54; distress, B = 15.20, t(37) = 1.31, p = .197, d = 0.07, BF<sub>10</sub> = 0.51; or heart rate, B = -1.09, t(36) = -0.32, p = .755, d = 0.02, BF<sub>10</sub> = 0.29, evoked by idiographic trauma script presentation in the context of acute or repeated administration. These data suggest that CBD may not effectively reduce trauma-relevant emotional arousal; however, more work is needed to confidently assert such claims due to the small sample size. The current study extends the groundwork for additional studies in this important area.</p>","PeriodicalId":17519,"journal":{"name":"Journal of traumatic stress","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of traumatic stress","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.23072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the widespread use and perceived efficacy of cannabidiol (CBD) as an anxiolytic, few controlled studies have evaluated the effects of CBD on anxiety-relevant indications, and only one has done so in the context of trauma-related symptoms. The current study was designed to address this gap in the literature. Participants were 42 trauma-exposed individuals (Mage = 23.12 years, SDage = 6.61) who endorsed elevated stress. They were randomly assigned to take 300 mg of oral CBD or placebo daily for 1 week. Acute (i.e., following an initial 300 mg dose) and repeated (i.e., following 1 week of daily 300 mg dosing) effects of CBD were evaluated in relation to indicators of anxious arousal (i.e., anxiety, distress, heart rate) in response to idiographic trauma script presentation. The results of the current study suggest that relative to placebo, 300 mg CBD did not significantly reduce anxiety, B = 13.37, t(37) = 1.71, p = .096, d = 0.09, Bayes factor (BF10) = 0.54; distress, B = 15.20, t(37) = 1.31, p = .197, d = 0.07, BF10 = 0.51; or heart rate, B = -1.09, t(36) = -0.32, p = .755, d = 0.02, BF10 = 0.29, evoked by idiographic trauma script presentation in the context of acute or repeated administration. These data suggest that CBD may not effectively reduce trauma-relevant emotional arousal; however, more work is needed to confidently assert such claims due to the small sample size. The current study extends the groundwork for additional studies in this important area.

急性与反复服用大麻二酚对创伤相关情绪反应的影响:双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
尽管大麻二酚(CBD)作为抗焦虑药被广泛使用并被认为具有疗效,但很少有对照研究评估过大麻二酚对焦虑相关指征的影响,只有一项研究是针对创伤相关症状进行评估的。本研究旨在填补这一文献空白。研究对象为 42 名遭受过创伤的个体(年龄平均值为 23.12 岁,最小年龄为 6.61 岁),他们均表示压力升高。他们被随机分配到每天口服 300 毫克 CBD 或安慰剂,为期一周。根据对特异性创伤脚本演示的焦虑唤醒指标(即焦虑、痛苦、心率),评估了 CBD 的急性(即首次服用 300 毫克后)和重复(即每日服用 300 毫克 1 周后)效应。目前的研究结果表明,相对于安慰剂,300 毫克 CBD 并未显著降低焦虑,B = 13.37,t(37) = 1.71,p = .096,d = 0.09,贝叶斯因子 (BF10) = 0.54;窘迫,B = 15.20,t(37) = 1.31, p = .197, d = 0.07, BF10 = 0.51;或心率,B = -1.09, t(36) = -0.32, p = .755, d = 0.02, BF10 = 0.29,由急性或重复给药情况下的特异性创伤脚本演示诱发。这些数据表明,CBD 可能无法有效降低与创伤相关的情绪唤醒;然而,由于样本量较小,还需要做更多的工作才能确信这种说法。目前的研究为这一重要领域的其他研究奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
125
期刊介绍: Journal of Traumatic Stress (JTS) is published for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress , the official publication for the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, is an interdisciplinary forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on biopsychosocial aspects of trauma. Papers focus on theoretical formulations, research, treatment, prevention education/training, and legal and policy concerns. Journal of Traumatic Stress serves as a primary reference for professionals who study and treat people exposed to highly stressful and traumatic events (directly or through their occupational roles), such as war, disaster, accident, violence or abuse (criminal or familial), hostage-taking, or life-threatening illness. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, review papers, commentaries, and, from time to time, special issues devoted to a single topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信