Pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis: genetic, environmental and random mechanisms.

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Douglas S Goodin
{"title":"Pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis: genetic, environmental and random mechanisms.","authors":"Douglas S Goodin","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2023-333296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS) requires both genetic factors and environmental events. The question remains, however, whether these factors and events completely describe the MS disease process. This question was addressed using the Canadian MS data, which includes 29 478 individuals, estimated to represent 65-83% of all Canadian patients with MS.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The 'genetically-susceptible' subset of the population, (G), includes everyone who has any non-zero life-time chance of developing MS, under some environmental conditions. A 'sufficient' environmental exposure, for any genetically-susceptible individual, includes every set of environmental conditions, each of which is 'sufficient', by itself, to <i>cause</i> MS in that person. This analysis incorporates many epidemiological parameters, involved in MS pathogenesis, only some of which are directly observable, and establishes 'plausible' value ranges for each parameter. Those parameter value combinations (ie, solutions) that fall within these plausible ranges are then determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only a small proportion of the population (≤52%) has any possibility of developing MS, regardless of any environmental conditions that they could experience. Moreover, some of these genetically-susceptible individuals, despite their experiencing a 'sufficient' environmental exposure, will still not develop disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This analysis explicitly includes all of those genetic factors and environmental events (including their interactions), which are necessary for MS pathogenesis, regardless of whether these factors, events and interactions are known, suspected or as yet unrecognised. Nevertheless, in addition, a 'truly' random mechanism also seems to play a critical role in disease pathogenesis. This observation provides empirical evidence, which undermines the widely-held deterministic view of nature. Moreover, both sexes seem to share a similar genetic and environmental disease basis. If so, then it is this random mechanism, which is primarily responsible for the currently-observed differences in MS disease expression between <i>susceptible women</i> and <i>susceptible men</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11503101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2023-333296","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS) requires both genetic factors and environmental events. The question remains, however, whether these factors and events completely describe the MS disease process. This question was addressed using the Canadian MS data, which includes 29 478 individuals, estimated to represent 65-83% of all Canadian patients with MS.

Method: The 'genetically-susceptible' subset of the population, (G), includes everyone who has any non-zero life-time chance of developing MS, under some environmental conditions. A 'sufficient' environmental exposure, for any genetically-susceptible individual, includes every set of environmental conditions, each of which is 'sufficient', by itself, to cause MS in that person. This analysis incorporates many epidemiological parameters, involved in MS pathogenesis, only some of which are directly observable, and establishes 'plausible' value ranges for each parameter. Those parameter value combinations (ie, solutions) that fall within these plausible ranges are then determined.

Results: Only a small proportion of the population (≤52%) has any possibility of developing MS, regardless of any environmental conditions that they could experience. Moreover, some of these genetically-susceptible individuals, despite their experiencing a 'sufficient' environmental exposure, will still not develop disease.

Conclusions: This analysis explicitly includes all of those genetic factors and environmental events (including their interactions), which are necessary for MS pathogenesis, regardless of whether these factors, events and interactions are known, suspected or as yet unrecognised. Nevertheless, in addition, a 'truly' random mechanism also seems to play a critical role in disease pathogenesis. This observation provides empirical evidence, which undermines the widely-held deterministic view of nature. Moreover, both sexes seem to share a similar genetic and environmental disease basis. If so, then it is this random mechanism, which is primarily responsible for the currently-observed differences in MS disease expression between susceptible women and susceptible men.

多发性硬化症的发病机制:遗传、环境和随机机制。
背景:多发性硬化症(MS)的发病机制需要遗传因素和环境事件的共同作用。但是,这些因素和事件是否能完全描述多发性硬化症的发病过程,这个问题仍然存在。加拿大多发性硬化症数据包括 29 478 人,估计占加拿大所有多发性硬化症患者的 65-83%:方法:人口中的 "基因易感 "子集(G)包括在某些环境条件下终生有非零机会患多发性硬化症的所有人。对于任何基因易感者来说,"足够 "的环境暴露包括每一组环境条件,其中每一个环境条件本身都 "足够 "导致该人患上多发性硬化症。这种分析包含了许多与多发性硬化症发病机制有关的流行病学参数,其中只有部分参数是可以直接观察到的,并为每个参数确定了 "可信 "的数值范围。然后确定在这些合理范围内的参数值组合(即解决方案):只有一小部分人(≤52%)有可能罹患多发性硬化症,无论他们可能经历的环境条件如何。此外,在这些基因易感者中,有些人尽管经历了 "足够 "的环境暴露,但仍然不会发病:这项分析明确包括了多发性硬化症发病所必需的所有遗传因素和环境事件(包括它们之间的相互作用),无论这些因素、事件和相互作用是已知的、可疑的还是尚未认识到的。然而,除此之外,"真正的 "随机机制似乎也在疾病发病机制中发挥着关键作用。这一观察结果提供了实证证据,从而削弱了人们普遍持有的自然决定论观点。此外,两性似乎都有相似的遗传和环境疾病基础。如果是这样的话,那么正是这种随机机制是目前观察到的易感女性和易感男性之间多发性硬化症疾病表达差异的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
1.80%
发文量
888
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (JNNP) aspires to publish groundbreaking and cutting-edge research worldwide. Covering the entire spectrum of neurological sciences, the journal focuses on common disorders like stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, peripheral neuropathy, subarachnoid haemorrhage, and neuropsychiatry, while also addressing complex challenges such as ALS. With early online publication, regular podcasts, and an extensive archive collection boasting the longest half-life in clinical neuroscience journals, JNNP aims to be a trailblazer in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信