Imaging meningioma biology: Machine learning predicts integrated risk score in WHO grade 2/3 meningioma.

IF 3.7 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neuro-oncology advances Pub Date : 2024-05-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/noajnl/vdae080
Olivia Kertels, Claire Delbridge, Felix Sahm, Felix Ehret, Güliz Acker, David Capper, Jan C Peeken, Christian Diehl, Michael Griessmair, Marie-Christin Metz, Chiara Negwer, Sandro M Krieg, Julia Onken, Igor Yakushev, Peter Vajkoczy, Bernhard Meyer, Daniel Zips, Stephanie E Combs, Claus Zimmer, David Kaul, Denise Bernhardt, Benedikt Wiestler
{"title":"Imaging meningioma biology: Machine learning predicts integrated risk score in WHO grade 2/3 meningioma.","authors":"Olivia Kertels, Claire Delbridge, Felix Sahm, Felix Ehret, Güliz Acker, David Capper, Jan C Peeken, Christian Diehl, Michael Griessmair, Marie-Christin Metz, Chiara Negwer, Sandro M Krieg, Julia Onken, Igor Yakushev, Peter Vajkoczy, Bernhard Meyer, Daniel Zips, Stephanie E Combs, Claus Zimmer, David Kaul, Denise Bernhardt, Benedikt Wiestler","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdae080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Meningiomas are the most common primary brain tumors. While most are benign (WHO grade 1) and have a favorable prognosis, up to one-fourth are classified as higher-grade, falling into WHO grade 2 or 3 categories. Recently, an integrated risk score (IRS) pertaining to tumor biology was developed and its prognostic relevance was validated in a large, multicenter study. We hypothesized imaging data to be reflective of the IRS. Thus, we assessed the potential of a machine learning classifier for its noninvasive prediction using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 160 WHO grade 2 and 3 meningioma patients from 2 university centers were included in this study. All patients underwent surgery with histopathological workup including methylation analysis. Preoperative MRI scans were automatically segmented, and radiomic parameters were extracted. Using a random forest classifier, 3 machine learning classifiers (1 multiclass classifier for IRS and 2 binary classifiers for low-risk and high-risk prediction, respectively) were developed in a training set (120 patients) and independently tested in a hold-out test set (40 patients).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multiclass IRS classification had a test set area under the curve (AUC) of 0.7, mostly driven by the difficulties in clearly separating medium-risk from high-risk patients. Consequently, a classifier predicting low-risk IRS versus medium-/high-risk showed a very high test accuracy of 90% (AUC 0.88). In particular, \"sphericity\" was associated with low-risk IRS classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The IRS, in particular molecular low-risk, can be predicted from imaging data with high accuracy, making this important prognostic classification accessible by imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11217900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdae080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Meningiomas are the most common primary brain tumors. While most are benign (WHO grade 1) and have a favorable prognosis, up to one-fourth are classified as higher-grade, falling into WHO grade 2 or 3 categories. Recently, an integrated risk score (IRS) pertaining to tumor biology was developed and its prognostic relevance was validated in a large, multicenter study. We hypothesized imaging data to be reflective of the IRS. Thus, we assessed the potential of a machine learning classifier for its noninvasive prediction using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods: In total, 160 WHO grade 2 and 3 meningioma patients from 2 university centers were included in this study. All patients underwent surgery with histopathological workup including methylation analysis. Preoperative MRI scans were automatically segmented, and radiomic parameters were extracted. Using a random forest classifier, 3 machine learning classifiers (1 multiclass classifier for IRS and 2 binary classifiers for low-risk and high-risk prediction, respectively) were developed in a training set (120 patients) and independently tested in a hold-out test set (40 patients).

Results: Multiclass IRS classification had a test set area under the curve (AUC) of 0.7, mostly driven by the difficulties in clearly separating medium-risk from high-risk patients. Consequently, a classifier predicting low-risk IRS versus medium-/high-risk showed a very high test accuracy of 90% (AUC 0.88). In particular, "sphericity" was associated with low-risk IRS classification.

Conclusion: The IRS, in particular molecular low-risk, can be predicted from imaging data with high accuracy, making this important prognostic classification accessible by imaging.

脑膜瘤生物学成像:机器学习预测世卫组织 2/3 级脑膜瘤的综合风险评分。
背景:脑膜瘤是最常见的原发性脑肿瘤:脑膜瘤是最常见的原发性脑肿瘤。虽然大多数脑膜瘤是良性的(WHO 1 级),预后良好,但多达四分之一的脑膜瘤被归类为较高级别的肿瘤,属于 WHO 2 级或 3 级。最近,一项大型多中心研究开发了与肿瘤生物学相关的综合风险评分(IRS),并对其预后相关性进行了验证。我们假设成像数据可以反映 IRS。因此,我们评估了机器学习分类器利用术前磁共振成像(MRI)进行无创预测的潜力:本研究共纳入了来自两所大学中心的 160 名 WHO 2 级和 3 级脑膜瘤患者。所有患者均接受了包括甲基化分析在内的组织病理学检查。术前的核磁共振扫描会自动分割,并提取放射学参数。使用随机森林分类器,在训练集(120 名患者)中开发了 3 个机器学习分类器(1 个用于 IRS 的多分类器和 2 个分别用于低风险和高风险预测的二进制分类器),并在保留测试集(40 名患者)中进行了独立测试:多类 IRS 分类的测试集曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.7,主要原因是难以明确区分中危和高危患者。因此,预测低风险 IRS 与中/高风险的分类器的测试准确率非常高,达到 90%(AUC 0.88)。结论:结论:IRS,尤其是分子低风险,可以通过影像学数据进行高精度预测,这使得影像学可以进行这一重要的预后分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信