Analyzing the Psychometric Properties of Infant (0-24 Months) Developmental Assessments: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.7

Developmental neurorehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1080/17518423.2024.2374534

Sambidha Ghimire, Eva Ang, Morgan Deibert, Emily Hartvich, Sandra Fucile

{"title":"Analyzing the Psychometric Properties of Infant (0-24 Months) Developmental Assessments: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Sambidha Ghimire, Eva Ang, Morgan Deibert, Emily Hartvich, Sandra Fucile","doi":"10.1080/17518423.2024.2374534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To assess the psychometric properties of available developmental assessments for infants, aged 0-24 months.Methods: A scoping review was conducted using the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews as a guideline. The following four databases: Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science were used to retrieve articles. Assessments were analyzed for psychometric properties of reliability and validity. Results: Fifteen developmental assessments were identified and evaluated based on their psychometric properties from 20 number of articles.Results: Three assessments including Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development 3rd Edition (BSID-III), Caregiver Reported Early Development Instruments (CREDI), and Ages and Stages Questionnaire 3rd Edition (ASQ-3), were identified to have the most supporting evidence.Conclusion: This study provided clinicians with an updated list of all-encompassing infant developmental assessments. Certain assessments require additional evidence regarding their psychometric properties to substantiate their clinical utility.","PeriodicalId":93976,"journal":{"name":"Developmental neurorehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"204-215"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental neurorehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2024.2374534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the psychometric properties of available developmental assessments for infants, aged 0-24 months.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted using the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews as a guideline. The following four databases: Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science were used to retrieve articles. Assessments were analyzed for psychometric properties of reliability and validity. Results: Fifteen developmental assessments were identified and evaluated based on their psychometric properties from 20 number of articles.

Results: Three assessments including Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development 3rd Edition (BSID-III), Caregiver Reported Early Development Instruments (CREDI), and Ages and Stages Questionnaire 3rd Edition (ASQ-3), were identified to have the most supporting evidence.

Conclusion: This study provided clinicians with an updated list of all-encompassing infant developmental assessments. Certain assessments require additional evidence regarding their psychometric properties to substantiate their clinical utility.

查看原文本刊更多论文

分析婴儿（0-24 个月）发育评估的心理计量特性：范围综述》。

目的：评估现有 0-24 个月婴儿发育评估的心理测量特性：以 "范围界定综述扩展指南"（PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews）为指导，进行了范围界定综述。以下四个数据库使用 Medline、CINAHL、Embase 和 Web of Science 检索文章。对评估的心理测量特性进行了信度和效度分析。结果：从 20 篇文章中确定了 15 项发展性评估，并根据其心理测量特性进行了评估：结果：包括贝利婴幼儿发展量表第三版（BSID-III）、护理人员报告早期发展工具（CREDI）和年龄与阶段问卷第三版（ASQ-3）在内的三项评估被确定为支持证据最多：结论：本研究为临床医生提供了一份最新的全面婴儿发育评估清单。结论：本研究为临床医生提供了一份最新的全面婴儿发育评估清单，某些评估需要更多有关其心理测量特性的证据来证明其临床实用性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Developmental neurorehabilitation

自引率

0.00%

发文量