Flexible males, reactive females: faecal glucocorticoid metabolites indicate increased stress in the colonist population, damping with time in males but not in females.

IF 1.7 3区 生物学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Elena N Surkova, Ludmila E Savinetskaya, Ivan S Khropov, Andrey V Tchabovsky
{"title":"Flexible males, reactive females: faecal glucocorticoid metabolites indicate increased stress in the colonist population, damping with time in males but not in females.","authors":"Elena N Surkova, Ludmila E Savinetskaya, Ivan S Khropov, Andrey V Tchabovsky","doi":"10.1007/s00360-024-01564-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals colonizing new areas at expanding ranges encounter numerous and unpredictable stressors. Exposure to unfamiliar environments suggests that colonists would differ in stress levels from residents living in familiar conditions. Few empirical studies tested this hypothesis and produced mixed results, and the role of stress regulation in colonization remains unclear. Studies relating stress levels to colonization mainly use a geographical analysis comparing established colonist populations with source populations. We used faecal glucocorticoid metabolites (FGMs) to assess both spatial and temporal dynamics of stress levels in an expanding population of midday gerbils (Meriones meridianus). We demonstrated that adult males and females had higher FGM levels in newly emerged colonies, compared with the source population, but differed in the pattern of FGM dynamics post-foundation. In males, FGM levels sharply decreased in the second year after colony establishment. In females, FGM levels did not change with time and remained high despite the decreasing environmental unpredictability, exhibiting among-individual variation. Increased stress levels of colonist males damping with time post-colonization suggest they are flexible in responding to immediate changes in environmental uncertainty. On the contrary, high and stable over generations stress levels uncoupled from the changes in the environmental uncertainty in female colonists imply that they carry a relatively constant phenotype associated with the reactive coping strategy favouring colonization. We link sex differences in consistency and plasticity in stress regulation during colonization to the sex-specific life-history strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":56033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Physiology B-Biochemical Systems and Environmental Physiology","volume":" ","pages":"545-554"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Physiology B-Biochemical Systems and Environmental Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-024-01564-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individuals colonizing new areas at expanding ranges encounter numerous and unpredictable stressors. Exposure to unfamiliar environments suggests that colonists would differ in stress levels from residents living in familiar conditions. Few empirical studies tested this hypothesis and produced mixed results, and the role of stress regulation in colonization remains unclear. Studies relating stress levels to colonization mainly use a geographical analysis comparing established colonist populations with source populations. We used faecal glucocorticoid metabolites (FGMs) to assess both spatial and temporal dynamics of stress levels in an expanding population of midday gerbils (Meriones meridianus). We demonstrated that adult males and females had higher FGM levels in newly emerged colonies, compared with the source population, but differed in the pattern of FGM dynamics post-foundation. In males, FGM levels sharply decreased in the second year after colony establishment. In females, FGM levels did not change with time and remained high despite the decreasing environmental unpredictability, exhibiting among-individual variation. Increased stress levels of colonist males damping with time post-colonization suggest they are flexible in responding to immediate changes in environmental uncertainty. On the contrary, high and stable over generations stress levels uncoupled from the changes in the environmental uncertainty in female colonists imply that they carry a relatively constant phenotype associated with the reactive coping strategy favouring colonization. We link sex differences in consistency and plasticity in stress regulation during colonization to the sex-specific life-history strategies.

Abstract Image

灵活的雄性,反应性的雌性:粪便中的糖皮质激素代谢物表明蚁群的压力增加,随着时间的推移,雄性的压力会减弱,而雌性不会。
个体在不断扩大的范围内殖民新地区时,会遇到许多不可预测的压力因素。暴露于陌生环境表明,殖民者的压力水平与生活在熟悉环境中的居民不同。很少有实证研究对这一假设进行检验,结果也不尽相同,压力调节在殖民化中的作用仍不清楚。有关压力水平与定殖的研究主要采用地理分析方法,将已建立的定殖种群与来源种群进行比较。我们利用粪便中的糖皮质激素代谢物(FGMs)来评估正午沙鼠(Meriones meridianus)种群扩张过程中压力水平的时空动态。我们发现,在新出现的种群中,成年雄性和雌性沙鼠的 FGM 水平高于源种群,但在建立种群后,FGM 的动态模式有所不同。在雄性中,FGM水平在蚁群建立后的第二年急剧下降。在雌性个体中,尽管环境的不可预测性降低,但雌性个体的FGM水平并没有随着时间的推移而发生变化,而且仍然很高,表现出个体间的差异。随着时间的推移,殖群后雄性的应激水平增加,这表明它们能灵活应对环境不确定性的即时变化。相反,与环境不确定性的变化无关,雌性殖户的压力水平高且世代稳定,这意味着它们具有与有利于殖户的反应性应对策略相关的相对恒定的表型。我们将殖民过程中压力调节的一致性和可塑性方面的性别差异与性别特有的生活史策略联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Comparative Physiology B publishes peer-reviewed original articles and reviews on the comparative physiology of invertebrate and vertebrate animals. Special emphasis is placed on integrative studies that elucidate mechanisms at the whole-animal, organ, tissue, cellular and/or molecular levels. Review papers report on the current state of knowledge in an area of comparative physiology, and directions in which future research is needed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信