Training Outcomes and Satisfaction in Canadian MD/PhD and MD/MSc Programs: Findings from a National Survey.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Mimosa Luigi, Charles Yin, Ehsan Misaghi, Robert X Lao, Bryce J M Bogie, Jillian Macklin, Andy Zeng, Nicola Jones
{"title":"Training Outcomes and Satisfaction in Canadian MD/PhD and MD/MSc Programs: Findings from a National Survey.","authors":"Mimosa Luigi, Charles Yin, Ehsan Misaghi, Robert X Lao, Bryce J M Bogie, Jillian Macklin, Andy Zeng, Nicola Jones","doi":"10.3138/cim-2024-2714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite the impact of physician-scientists on scientific discovery and translational medicine, several reports have signalled their declining workforce, reduced funding, and insufficient protected research time. Given the paucity of outcome data on Canadian MD/PhD programs, this study presents a national portrait of the sociodemographic characteristics, training trajectories, productivity, and satisfaction in trainees and alumni from Canadian MD/PhD and MD/MSc programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Quantitative data were collected in a national survey launched in 2021. Respondents included 74 MD/PhD alumni and 121 trainees across 12 Canadian MD/PhD and MD/MSc programs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among MD/PhD alumni, 51% were independent practitioners/researchers while others underwent residency training. Most trainees (88%) were in MD/PhD programs. Significantly more alumni identified as men than did trainees. Significantly more alumni conducted clinical and health services research, while more trainees conducted basic science research. Average time to MD/PhD completion was 8 years, with no correlation to subsequent research outcomes. Self-reported research productivity was highest during MD/PhD training. Concerning training trajectories, most alumni completed residency, pursued additional training, and practised in Canada. Finally, regression models showed that trainees and alumni were satisfied with programs, with significant moderators in trainee models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Survey findings showed Canadian MD/PhD and MD/MSc programs recruit more diverse cohorts of trainees than before, provide productive research years, and graduate alumni who pursue training and academic employment in Canada. Both alumni and trainees are largely satisfied with these training programs. The need to collect in-depth longitudinal data on Canadian MD/PhD graduates to monitor diversity and success metrics is discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50683,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Investigative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Investigative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cim-2024-2714","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Despite the impact of physician-scientists on scientific discovery and translational medicine, several reports have signalled their declining workforce, reduced funding, and insufficient protected research time. Given the paucity of outcome data on Canadian MD/PhD programs, this study presents a national portrait of the sociodemographic characteristics, training trajectories, productivity, and satisfaction in trainees and alumni from Canadian MD/PhD and MD/MSc programs.

Methods: Quantitative data were collected in a national survey launched in 2021. Respondents included 74 MD/PhD alumni and 121 trainees across 12 Canadian MD/PhD and MD/MSc programs.

Results: Among MD/PhD alumni, 51% were independent practitioners/researchers while others underwent residency training. Most trainees (88%) were in MD/PhD programs. Significantly more alumni identified as men than did trainees. Significantly more alumni conducted clinical and health services research, while more trainees conducted basic science research. Average time to MD/PhD completion was 8 years, with no correlation to subsequent research outcomes. Self-reported research productivity was highest during MD/PhD training. Concerning training trajectories, most alumni completed residency, pursued additional training, and practised in Canada. Finally, regression models showed that trainees and alumni were satisfied with programs, with significant moderators in trainee models.

Conclusion: Survey findings showed Canadian MD/PhD and MD/MSc programs recruit more diverse cohorts of trainees than before, provide productive research years, and graduate alumni who pursue training and academic employment in Canada. Both alumni and trainees are largely satisfied with these training programs. The need to collect in-depth longitudinal data on Canadian MD/PhD graduates to monitor diversity and success metrics is discussed.

加拿大 MD/PhD 和 MD/MSc 项目的培训成果和满意度:全国调查的结果。
目的:尽管医生科学家对科学发现和转化医学产生了影响,但一些报告显示他们的劳动力正在下降、资金减少以及受保护的研究时间不足。鉴于加拿大医学博士/博士项目的成果数据很少,本研究介绍了加拿大医学博士/博士和医学硕士/理学博士项目受训者和校友的社会人口学特征、培训轨迹、生产力和满意度:方法:2021年启动的一项全国调查收集了定量数据。受访者包括加拿大12个医学博士/博士和医学硕士项目的74名医学博士/博士校友和121名学员:在医学博士/博士校友中,51%是独立从业者/研究人员,其他人则接受了住院医师培训。大多数受训者(88%)是医学博士/博士项目的学员。男性校友明显多于学员。从事临床和健康服务研究的校友明显多于从事基础科学研究的学员。完成医学博士/博士学业的平均时间为 8 年,与随后的研究成果没有关联。在医学博士/博士培训期间,自我报告的研究效率最高。关于培训轨迹,大多数校友都完成了住院医师培训,接受了更多培训,并在加拿大执业。最后,回归模型显示,受训者和校友都对培训项目感到满意,其中受训者模型具有重要的调节作用:调查结果显示,加拿大医学博士/博士和医学硕士/理学博士项目招收的学员比以前更加多样化,提供了富有成效的研究年限,毕业的校友在加拿大接受培训并从事学术工作。校友和学员对这些培训项目基本满意。本文讨论了收集加拿大医学博士/博士毕业生深度纵向数据以监测多样性和成功指标的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical and Investigative Medicine
Clinical and Investigative Medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Investigative Medicine (CIM), publishes original work in the field of Clinical Investigation. Original work includes clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical reports. Reviews include information for Continuing Medical Education (CME), narrative review articles, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信