Surface dose measurement by optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter: A phantom study

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"Surface dose measurement by optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter: A phantom study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2024.06.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>Radiotherapy<span> is the standard treatment for breast cancer patients after surgery. However, radiotherapy can cause side effects such as dry and moist </span></span>desquamation<span> of the patient's skin. The dose calculation from a treatment planning system (TPS) might also be inaccurate. The purpose of this study is to measure the surface dose on the CIRS thorax phantom by an optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter (OSLD).</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The characteristics of OSLD were studied in terms of dose linearity, reproducibility, and angulation dependence on the solid water phantom. To determine the surface dose, OSLD (Landauer lnc., USA) was placed on 5 positions at the CIRS phantom (Tissue Simulation and Phantom Technology, USA). The five positions were at the tip, medial, lateral, tip-medial, and tip-lateral. Then, the doses from OSLD and TPS were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The dosimeter's characteristic test was good. The maximum dose at a depth of 15 mm was 514.46 cGy, which was at 100%. The minimum dose at the surface was 174.91 cGy, which was at 34%. The results revealed that the surface dose from TPS was less than the measurement. The percent dose difference was −2.17 ± 6.34, −12.08 ± 3.85, and −48.71 ± 1.29 at the tip, medial, and lateral positions, respectively. The surface dose from TPS at tip-medial and tip-lateral was higher than the measurement, which was 12.56 ± 5.55 and 10.45 ± 1.76 percent dose different, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The percent dose difference is within the acceptable limit, except for the lateral position because of the body curvature. However, OSLD is convenient to assess the radiation dose, and further study is to measure in vivo.</p></div><div><h3>Implication for practice</h3><p>The OSL NanoDot dosimeter can be used for dose validation with a constant setup location. The measurement dose is higher than the dose from TPS, except for some tilt angles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424001597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Radiotherapy is the standard treatment for breast cancer patients after surgery. However, radiotherapy can cause side effects such as dry and moist desquamation of the patient's skin. The dose calculation from a treatment planning system (TPS) might also be inaccurate. The purpose of this study is to measure the surface dose on the CIRS thorax phantom by an optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter (OSLD).

Methods

The characteristics of OSLD were studied in terms of dose linearity, reproducibility, and angulation dependence on the solid water phantom. To determine the surface dose, OSLD (Landauer lnc., USA) was placed on 5 positions at the CIRS phantom (Tissue Simulation and Phantom Technology, USA). The five positions were at the tip, medial, lateral, tip-medial, and tip-lateral. Then, the doses from OSLD and TPS were compared.

Results

The dosimeter's characteristic test was good. The maximum dose at a depth of 15 mm was 514.46 cGy, which was at 100%. The minimum dose at the surface was 174.91 cGy, which was at 34%. The results revealed that the surface dose from TPS was less than the measurement. The percent dose difference was −2.17 ± 6.34, −12.08 ± 3.85, and −48.71 ± 1.29 at the tip, medial, and lateral positions, respectively. The surface dose from TPS at tip-medial and tip-lateral was higher than the measurement, which was 12.56 ± 5.55 and 10.45 ± 1.76 percent dose different, respectively.

Conclusion

The percent dose difference is within the acceptable limit, except for the lateral position because of the body curvature. However, OSLD is convenient to assess the radiation dose, and further study is to measure in vivo.

Implication for practice

The OSL NanoDot dosimeter can be used for dose validation with a constant setup location. The measurement dose is higher than the dose from TPS, except for some tilt angles.

用光刺激发光剂量计测量表面剂量:模型研究
简介放疗是乳腺癌患者术后的标准治疗方法。然而,放疗可能会导致副作用,如患者皮肤出现干性和湿性脱屑。治疗计划系统(TPS)的剂量计算也可能不准确。本研究的目的是用光刺激发光剂量计(OSLD)测量 CIRS 胸部模型的表面剂量:方法:研究 OSLD 在固体水模型上的剂量线性、可重复性和角度依赖性等方面的特性。为了确定表面剂量,OSLD(Landauer lnc.,美国)被放置在 CIRS 模型(组织模拟和模型技术,美国)的 5 个位置上。这五个位置分别是顶端、内侧、外侧、顶端-内侧和顶端-外侧。然后,比较 OSLD 和 TPS 的剂量:结果:剂量计的特性测试良好。15 毫米深度的最大剂量为 514.46 cGy,达到 100%。表面的最小剂量为 174.91 cGy,占 34%。结果显示,TPS 的表面剂量小于测量值。在顶端、内侧和外侧位置,剂量差异百分比分别为-2.17 ± 6.34、-12.08 ± 3.85和-48.71 ± 1.29。尖端-内侧和尖端-外侧的 TPS 表面剂量高于测量值,分别为 12.56 ± 5.55 和 10.45 ± 1.76%:结论:除侧位外,其他位置的剂量差异都在可接受范围内。然而,OSLD 方便评估辐射剂量,进一步的研究需要在体内进行测量:对实践的启示:OSL NanoDot 剂量计可用于剂量验证,设置位置不变。除某些倾斜角度外,测量剂量高于 TPS 的剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信