Factors Associated With Physical Restraints in a Psychiatric Unit in Japan: a Retrospective Study.

Q3 Medicine
K Kawai, H Yamada, H Tomioka, A Iwanami, A Inamoto
{"title":"Factors Associated With Physical Restraints in a Psychiatric Unit in Japan: a Retrospective Study.","authors":"K Kawai, H Yamada, H Tomioka, A Iwanami, A Inamoto","doi":"10.12809/eaap2334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify factors associated with the use and duration of physical restraint (PR) in a psychiatric unit in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records of 1308 patients admitted first time to the psychiatric emergency unit of Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected included patient age, sex, outpatient treatment, living arrangements, disability pension status, diagnosis (based on ICD-10), and psychotropic medication use at admission (chlorpromazine equivalent dose, imipramine equivalent dose, diazepam equivalent dose, and number of mood stabilisers administered). Logistic regression analysis and multiple regression analysis were used to identify factors associated with the use and duration of PR, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1308 patients, 399 (30.5%) were subjected to PR and 909 (69.5%) were not. Among the 399 patients subjected to PR, 54 were excluded from the multiple regression analysis for duration of PR as they remained subject to PR on the day of discharge. The remaining 345 patients were subject to PR for a median of 10 days. PR utilisation was associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 1.420), treatment at our hospital (OR = 0.260), treatment at other hospitals (OR = 0.645), F3 diagnosis (depression) [OR = 0.290], F4-9 diagnosis (OR = 0.309), and imipramine equivalent dose at admission (unit OR = 0.994). The log-transformed duration of PR was independently associated with the age group of 50 to 69 years (β = 0.248), the age group of ≥70 years (β = 0.274), receiving a disability pension (β = 0.153), an F1 diagnosis (β = -0.187), an F4-9 diagnosis (β = -0.182), chlorpromazine equivalent dose at admission (β = 0.0004), and number of mood stabilisers administered at admission (β = -0.270).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Identifying factors associated with the use and duration of PR may lead to reduction in the use and duration of PR.</p>","PeriodicalId":39171,"journal":{"name":"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12809/eaap2334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify factors associated with the use and duration of physical restraint (PR) in a psychiatric unit in Japan.

Methods: Medical records of 1308 patients admitted first time to the psychiatric emergency unit of Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected included patient age, sex, outpatient treatment, living arrangements, disability pension status, diagnosis (based on ICD-10), and psychotropic medication use at admission (chlorpromazine equivalent dose, imipramine equivalent dose, diazepam equivalent dose, and number of mood stabilisers administered). Logistic regression analysis and multiple regression analysis were used to identify factors associated with the use and duration of PR, respectively.

Results: Of 1308 patients, 399 (30.5%) were subjected to PR and 909 (69.5%) were not. Among the 399 patients subjected to PR, 54 were excluded from the multiple regression analysis for duration of PR as they remained subject to PR on the day of discharge. The remaining 345 patients were subject to PR for a median of 10 days. PR utilisation was associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 1.420), treatment at our hospital (OR = 0.260), treatment at other hospitals (OR = 0.645), F3 diagnosis (depression) [OR = 0.290], F4-9 diagnosis (OR = 0.309), and imipramine equivalent dose at admission (unit OR = 0.994). The log-transformed duration of PR was independently associated with the age group of 50 to 69 years (β = 0.248), the age group of ≥70 years (β = 0.274), receiving a disability pension (β = 0.153), an F1 diagnosis (β = -0.187), an F4-9 diagnosis (β = -0.182), chlorpromazine equivalent dose at admission (β = 0.0004), and number of mood stabilisers administered at admission (β = -0.270).

Conclusion: Identifying factors associated with the use and duration of PR may lead to reduction in the use and duration of PR.

日本精神病院中与人身限制相关的因素:一项回顾性研究。
摘要方法:回顾性分析 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间昭和大学北横滨医院精神科急诊室首次入院的 1308 名患者的病历:回顾性审查了 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间昭和大学北横滨医院精神科急诊室首次入院的 1308 名患者的医疗记录。收集的数据包括患者的年龄、性别、门诊治疗情况、生活安排、残疾抚恤金状况、诊断(基于ICD-10)以及入院时精神药物的使用情况(氯丙嗪等效剂量、丙咪嗪等效剂量、地西泮等效剂量以及使用情绪稳定剂的次数)。逻辑回归分析和多元回归分析分别用于确定与 PR 的使用和持续时间相关的因素:在 1308 名患者中,399 人(30.5%)接受了 PR 治疗,909 人(69.5%)未接受 PR 治疗。在 399 名接受过 PR 的患者中,有 54 名患者在出院当天仍在接受 PR,因此被排除在 PR 持续时间的多元回归分析之外。其余 345 名患者接受 PR 的时间中位数为 10 天。PR 的使用与以下因素相关:男性(几率比 [OR] = 1.420)、在本医院接受治疗(OR = 0.260)、在其他医院接受治疗(OR = 0.645)、F3 诊断(抑郁症)[OR = 0.290]、F4-9 诊断(OR = 0.309)和入院时的丙咪嗪当量剂量(单位 OR = 0.994)。经对数转换的 PR 持续时间与 50 至 69 岁年龄组(β = 0.248)、≥70 岁年龄组(β = 0.274)、领取残疾抚恤金(β = 0.153)、F1 诊断(β = -0.187)、F4-9 诊断(β = -0.182)、入院时氯丙嗪等效剂量(β = 0.0004)和入院时使用的情绪稳定剂数量(β = -0.270)独立相关:结论:确定与 PR 的使用和持续时间相关的因素可减少 PR 的使用和持续时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
East Asian Archives of Psychiatry
East Asian Archives of Psychiatry Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信