Accuracy of the national violent death reporting system in identifying unintentional firearm deaths to children by children.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Samuel Fischer, Matthew Miller, Catherine Barber, Deborah Azrael
{"title":"Accuracy of the national violent death reporting system in identifying unintentional firearm deaths to children by children.","authors":"Samuel Fischer, Matthew Miller, Catherine Barber, Deborah Azrael","doi":"10.1186/s40621-024-00499-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In assigning manner of death (MOD) for inclusion on death certificates, medical examiners and coroners do not always apply uniform criteria. Previous research indicates surveillance statistics based on death certificates, such as the National Vital Statistics System, grossly miscount unintentional firearm deaths. The National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) has taken steps to reduce variability in manner of death coding by providing uniform criteria for assigning an \"abstractor manner of death\" (AMD). AMD has five categories: unintentional, suicide, homicide, undetermined, and legal intervention homicide. A previous study found good accuracy of AMD coding for unintentional firearm deaths, all ages, 2003-2006, but a more recent study reported that the NVDRS undercounted self- and other-inflicted unintentional firearm deaths in which both the victim and shooter (for other-inflicted injuries) were under age 15 (2009-2018).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We replicated the recent study's sample population, identifying 924 NVDRS incidents from 2009 to 2018 in which both victim and, for other-inflicted injuries, shooter age was under 15 and AMD was homicide, suicide, unintentional or undetermined (there were no legal intervention deaths to children). We assigned a researcher-adjudicated MOD (RMD) by reviewing incident narratives. RMD was compared with AMD and with manner recorded on the death certificate. Based on RMD as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values positive and negative of the AMD for unintentional childhood firearm deaths were, respectively, 90%, 99%, 98% and 96%; 86% (24/28) of false negatives were coded by abstractors as homicides. By contrast, death certificate manner had relatively poor sensitivity (63%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our sample of 924 deaths, the abstractor manner of death generally agreed with researcher-adjudicated manner of death, though not perfectly, missing 10% of researcher-adjudicated unintentional deaths, mostly because abstractors coded these unintentional deaths as homicides. A sizable minority of false negatives were unintentional deaths where the narrative explicitly noted that adult negligence contributed to a child's unintentional shooting death. While AMD coding in NVDRS is good, it could be improved if NVDRS coding guidelines explicitly affirmed that potential prosecution for negligent manslaughter is not a contraindication to an AMD of unintentional, provided the firearm was not used to intentionally harm, threaten, or coerce.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11218214/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-024-00499-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In assigning manner of death (MOD) for inclusion on death certificates, medical examiners and coroners do not always apply uniform criteria. Previous research indicates surveillance statistics based on death certificates, such as the National Vital Statistics System, grossly miscount unintentional firearm deaths. The National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) has taken steps to reduce variability in manner of death coding by providing uniform criteria for assigning an "abstractor manner of death" (AMD). AMD has five categories: unintentional, suicide, homicide, undetermined, and legal intervention homicide. A previous study found good accuracy of AMD coding for unintentional firearm deaths, all ages, 2003-2006, but a more recent study reported that the NVDRS undercounted self- and other-inflicted unintentional firearm deaths in which both the victim and shooter (for other-inflicted injuries) were under age 15 (2009-2018).

Findings: We replicated the recent study's sample population, identifying 924 NVDRS incidents from 2009 to 2018 in which both victim and, for other-inflicted injuries, shooter age was under 15 and AMD was homicide, suicide, unintentional or undetermined (there were no legal intervention deaths to children). We assigned a researcher-adjudicated MOD (RMD) by reviewing incident narratives. RMD was compared with AMD and with manner recorded on the death certificate. Based on RMD as the gold standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values positive and negative of the AMD for unintentional childhood firearm deaths were, respectively, 90%, 99%, 98% and 96%; 86% (24/28) of false negatives were coded by abstractors as homicides. By contrast, death certificate manner had relatively poor sensitivity (63%).

Conclusions: In our sample of 924 deaths, the abstractor manner of death generally agreed with researcher-adjudicated manner of death, though not perfectly, missing 10% of researcher-adjudicated unintentional deaths, mostly because abstractors coded these unintentional deaths as homicides. A sizable minority of false negatives were unintentional deaths where the narrative explicitly noted that adult negligence contributed to a child's unintentional shooting death. While AMD coding in NVDRS is good, it could be improved if NVDRS coding guidelines explicitly affirmed that potential prosecution for negligent manslaughter is not a contraindication to an AMD of unintentional, provided the firearm was not used to intentionally harm, threaten, or coerce.

全国暴力死亡报告系统在确定儿童意外死于枪支方面的准确性。
背景:在指定死亡方式(MOD)以列入死亡证明书时,法医和验尸官并不总是采用统一的标准。以前的研究表明,基于死亡证明的监控统计数据(如国家生命统计系统)严重误计了非故意的枪支致死。全国暴力死亡报告系统(NVDRS)已采取措施,通过提供统一的 "抽取者死亡方式"(AMD)分配标准来减少死亡方式编码的差异性。AMD 有五个类别:非故意、自杀、他杀、未确定和法律干预他杀。之前的一项研究发现,2003-2006 年间所有年龄段的意外枪支死亡的 AMD 编码准确性良好,但最近的一项研究报告称,NVDRS 少计了受害者和枪手(其他伤害)年龄均在 15 岁以下的自己和他人造成的意外枪支死亡(2009-2018 年):我们复制了近期研究的样本人群,确定了 2009 年至 2018 年期间 924 起 NVDRS 事件,在这些事件中,受害者和枪手(对于其他造成的伤害)的年龄均在 15 岁以下,且 AMD 为凶杀、自杀、非蓄意或未确定(没有对儿童的法律干预死亡)。我们通过审查事件叙述,确定了研究人员判定的死亡率(RMD)。我们将RMD与AMD以及死亡证书上记录的方式进行了比较。以RMD作为金标准,AMD对儿童非故意持枪死亡的敏感性、特异性和预测值的阳性和阴性分别为90%、99%、98%和96%;86%(24/28)的假阴性被文摘员编码为凶杀。相比之下,死亡证明方式的灵敏度相对较低(63%):在我们的 924 例死亡样本中,抽样员的死亡方式与研究人员判定的死亡方式基本一致,但并不完全一致,有 10% 的研究人员判定的非故意死亡遗漏了,这主要是因为抽样员将这些非故意死亡编码为他杀。相当少数的假阴性是非故意死亡,其中的叙述明确指出成人的疏忽导致了儿童的非故意枪击死亡。虽然 NVDRS 中的 AMD 编码很好,但如果 NVDRS 的编码指南明确申明,只要枪支不是用于故意伤害、威胁或胁迫,则可能因过失杀人而被起诉并不构成非故意 AMD 的禁忌症,那么 NVDRS 的编码就可以得到改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信