Radiomics-Based Predictive Nomogram for Assessing the Risk of Intracranial Aneurysms.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sricharan S Veeturi, Arshaq Saleem, Diego J Ojeda, Elena Sagues, Sebastian Sanchez, Andres Gudino, Elad I Levy, David Hasan, Adnan H Siddiqui, Vincent M Tutino, Edgar A Samaniego
{"title":"Radiomics-Based Predictive Nomogram for Assessing the Risk of Intracranial Aneurysms.","authors":"Sricharan S Veeturi, Arshaq Saleem, Diego J Ojeda, Elena Sagues, Sebastian Sanchez, Andres Gudino, Elad I Levy, David Hasan, Adnan H Siddiqui, Vincent M Tutino, Edgar A Samaniego","doi":"10.1007/s12975-024-01268-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aneurysm wall enhancement (AWE) has the potential to be used as an imaging biomarker for the risk stratification of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). Radiomics provides a refined approach to quantify and further characterize AWE's textural features. This study examines the performance of AWE quantification combined with clinical information in detecting symptomatic IAs. Ninety patients harboring 104 IAs (29 symptomatic and 75 asymptomatic) underwent high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR-MRI). The assessment of AWE was performed using two different methods: 3D-AWE mapping and composite radiomics-based score (RadScore). The dataset was split into training and testing subsets. The testing set was used to build two different nomograms using each modality of AWE assessment combined with patients' clinical information and aneurysm morphological data. Finally, each nomogram was evaluated on an independent testing set. A total of 22 radiomic features were significantly different between symptomatic and asymptomatic IAs. The 3D-AWE mapping nomogram achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.77 (63% accuracy, 78% sensitivity, and 58% specificity). The RadScore nomogram exhibited a better performance, achieving an AUC of 0.83 (77% accuracy, 89% sensitivity, and 73% specificity). The comprehensive analysis of IAs with the quantification of AWE data through radiomic analysis, patient clinical information, and morphological aneurysm metrics achieves a high accuracy in detecting symptomatic IA status.</p>","PeriodicalId":23237,"journal":{"name":"Translational Stroke Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Stroke Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-024-01268-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aneurysm wall enhancement (AWE) has the potential to be used as an imaging biomarker for the risk stratification of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). Radiomics provides a refined approach to quantify and further characterize AWE's textural features. This study examines the performance of AWE quantification combined with clinical information in detecting symptomatic IAs. Ninety patients harboring 104 IAs (29 symptomatic and 75 asymptomatic) underwent high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (HR-MRI). The assessment of AWE was performed using two different methods: 3D-AWE mapping and composite radiomics-based score (RadScore). The dataset was split into training and testing subsets. The testing set was used to build two different nomograms using each modality of AWE assessment combined with patients' clinical information and aneurysm morphological data. Finally, each nomogram was evaluated on an independent testing set. A total of 22 radiomic features were significantly different between symptomatic and asymptomatic IAs. The 3D-AWE mapping nomogram achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.77 (63% accuracy, 78% sensitivity, and 58% specificity). The RadScore nomogram exhibited a better performance, achieving an AUC of 0.83 (77% accuracy, 89% sensitivity, and 73% specificity). The comprehensive analysis of IAs with the quantification of AWE data through radiomic analysis, patient clinical information, and morphological aneurysm metrics achieves a high accuracy in detecting symptomatic IA status.

Abstract Image

基于放射组学的颅内动脉瘤风险评估预测提名图。
动脉瘤壁强化(AWE)有可能被用作颅内动脉瘤(IAs)风险分层的成像生物标志物。放射组学提供了一种精细的方法来量化和进一步描述 AWE 的纹理特征。本研究考察了 AWE 定量与临床信息相结合在检测无症状 IAs 方面的性能。携带 104 个 IAs 的 90 位患者(29 位有症状,75 位无症状)接受了高分辨率磁共振成像(HR-MRI)检查。AWE评估采用两种不同的方法:3D-AWE图谱和基于放射组学的综合评分(RadScore)。数据集分为训练子集和测试子集。测试集用于使用每种 AWE 评估方式结合患者的临床信息和动脉瘤形态学数据建立两种不同的提名图。最后,在独立的测试集中对每个提名图进行评估。有症状和无症状动脉瘤之间共有22个放射学特征存在显著差异。3D-AWE 映射提名图的曲线下面积 (AUC) 为 0.77(准确率 63%、灵敏度 78% 和特异性 58%)。RadScore 直方图的性能更好,AUC 达到 0.83(准确率 77%、灵敏度 89% 和特异性 73%)。通过放射学分析、患者临床信息和动脉瘤形态学指标对动脉瘤进行综合分析,并对 AWE 数据进行量化,在检测无症状动脉瘤状态方面达到了很高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Stroke Research
Translational Stroke Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Stroke Research covers basic, translational, and clinical studies. The Journal emphasizes novel approaches to help both to understand clinical phenomenon through basic science tools, and to translate basic science discoveries into the development of new strategies for the prevention, assessment, treatment, and enhancement of central nervous system repair after stroke and other forms of neurotrauma. Translational Stroke Research focuses on translational research and is relevant to both basic scientists and physicians, including but not restricted to neuroscientists, vascular biologists, neurologists, neuroimagers, and neurosurgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信