Molecular testing for personalized therapy is underutilized in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer - real world data from the NORPACT-2 study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Ingvild Farnes, Marius Lund-Iversen, Lars Aabakken, Caroline Verbeke, Knut Jørgen Labori
{"title":"Molecular testing for personalized therapy is underutilized in patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer - real world data from the NORPACT-2 study.","authors":"Ingvild Farnes, Marius Lund-Iversen, Lars Aabakken, Caroline Verbeke, Knut Jørgen Labori","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2024.2373115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International guidelines currently recommend the use of molecular testing in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The rate of actionable molecular alterations is low. The utility of molecular testing in patients with borderline resectable (BRPC) or locally advanced (LAPC) pancreatic cancer in real world clinical practice is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>188 consecutive patients included in a prospective, population-based study (NORPACT-2) in patients with BRPC and LAPC (2018-2020) were reviewed. Molecular testing was performed at the discretion of the treating oncologist and was not recommended as a routine investigation by the national guidelines. All patients were considered fit to undergo primary chemotherapy and potential surgical resection. The frequency and the results of molecular testing (microsatellite instability (MSI) and/or KRAS status) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients (16%) underwent molecular testing. MSI tumour was detected in one (3.6%) of 28 tested patients. The patient received immunotherapy and subsequently underwent surgical resection. Histological assessment of the resected specimen revealed a complete response. KRAS wild type was detected in one (14.3%) of seven tested patient. Patients who initiated FOLFIRINOX as the primary chemotherapy regimen (<i>p</i> = 0.022), or were being treated at one of the eight hospital trusts (<i>p</i> = 0.001) were more likely to undergo molecular testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Molecular testing was rarely performed in patients with BRPC or LAPC. Routine molecular testing for all patients with BRPC and LAPC should be considered to increase identification of targetable mutations and improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"1093-1096"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2024.2373115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: International guidelines currently recommend the use of molecular testing in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The rate of actionable molecular alterations is low. The utility of molecular testing in patients with borderline resectable (BRPC) or locally advanced (LAPC) pancreatic cancer in real world clinical practice is unclear.

Methods: 188 consecutive patients included in a prospective, population-based study (NORPACT-2) in patients with BRPC and LAPC (2018-2020) were reviewed. Molecular testing was performed at the discretion of the treating oncologist and was not recommended as a routine investigation by the national guidelines. All patients were considered fit to undergo primary chemotherapy and potential surgical resection. The frequency and the results of molecular testing (microsatellite instability (MSI) and/or KRAS status) were assessed.

Results: Thirty patients (16%) underwent molecular testing. MSI tumour was detected in one (3.6%) of 28 tested patients. The patient received immunotherapy and subsequently underwent surgical resection. Histological assessment of the resected specimen revealed a complete response. KRAS wild type was detected in one (14.3%) of seven tested patient. Patients who initiated FOLFIRINOX as the primary chemotherapy regimen (p = 0.022), or were being treated at one of the eight hospital trusts (p = 0.001) were more likely to undergo molecular testing.

Conclusions: Molecular testing was rarely performed in patients with BRPC or LAPC. Routine molecular testing for all patients with BRPC and LAPC should be considered to increase identification of targetable mutations and improve outcomes.

用于个性化治疗的分子检测在边缘可切除和局部晚期胰腺癌患者中利用不足--来自 NORPACT-2 研究的真实世界数据。
背景:目前,国际指南建议对晚期胰腺癌患者进行分子检测。可操作的分子改变率很低。在现实世界的临床实践中,分子检测对边缘可切除(BRPC)或局部晚期(LAPC)胰腺癌患者的效用尚不明确。方法:对纳入一项前瞻性、基于人群的研究(NORPACT-2)的188例连续患者进行了回顾性研究,研究对象为BRPC和LAPC患者(2018-2020年)。分子检测由主治肿瘤学家决定是否进行,国家指南不推荐将其作为常规检查。所有患者均被认为适合接受基础化疗和可能的手术切除。对分子检测(微卫星不稳定性(MSI)和/或KRAS状态)的频率和结果进行了评估:30名患者(16%)接受了分子检测。在28名接受检测的患者中,1名患者(3.6%)被检测出MSI肿瘤。该患者接受了免疫疗法,随后进行了手术切除。切除标本的组织学评估显示患者获得了完全缓解。在 7 例接受检测的患者中,有 1 例(14.3%)检测出 KRAS 野生型。将FOLFIRINOX作为主要化疗方案(p = 0.022)或在八家医院托管机构之一接受治疗(p = 0.001)的患者更有可能接受分子检测:结论:BRPC或LAPC患者很少进行分子检测。应考虑对所有BRPC和LAPC患者进行常规分子检测,以提高可靶向突变的识别率并改善预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信