The Effect of Video Streaming With Virtual Reality Glasses on on Pain Anxiety and Satisfaction Applied in Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Process.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Sevil Güler, Seda Şahan, Selçuk Öztürk
{"title":"The Effect of Video Streaming With Virtual Reality Glasses on on Pain Anxiety and Satisfaction Applied in Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Process.","authors":"Sevil Güler, Seda Şahan, Selçuk Öztürk","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral intravenous catheter (PIC) implementation is among the most frequent and highly invasive nursing initiatives. PIC leads to anxiety with procedural pain, causing individuals to reject these procedures or negatively affecting the process's success.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study was conducted to determine the effect of virtual reality glasses (VRG) on pain, anxiety, and patient satisfaction during the peripheral intravenous catheter (PIC) process in adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An experimental study.</p><p><strong>Settings: </strong>An emergency department of a university hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals who were admitted to the emergency unit of the university hospital were recruited between the data collection dates. Data from individuals' \"Patient Information Form,\" \"Visual Pain Scale,\" \"Visual Anxiety Scale,\" and \"Visual Satisfaction Scale\" were collected. \"VR-Box 3D Glasses\" was used as virtual reality glasses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our study, when the pain point averages with VAS were compared during the PIC process, the pain score average of the patients in the control group was 5.78 ± 1.23 visual anxiety scale 5.89 ± 1.23 and patient satisfaction scale 3.86 ± 2.48, The visual pain score average of patients in the VRG group is 4.12 ± 2.16, visual anxiety scale 3.14 ± 1.76 and visual patient satisfaction scale 7.64 ± 3.26. In short, it has been detected that the pain, anxiety, and patient satisfaction score averages of patients in the VRG group are statistically significant compared to the pain score averages of patients in the control group (p < .005). Our study unearthed a statistically significant relationship at an average level of negative direction between PIC post-treatment pain, anxiety, and patient satisfaction (r = - 0.476).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Utilization of VRG has been detected to reduce pain and anxiety felt during the PIC process in adult patients and increase process satisfaction. VRG, a non-pharmacological, non-invasive, inexpensive, and feasible nursing initiative, may be recommended for use in pain and anxiety control in patients undergoing PIC treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.05.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Peripheral intravenous catheter (PIC) implementation is among the most frequent and highly invasive nursing initiatives. PIC leads to anxiety with procedural pain, causing individuals to reject these procedures or negatively affecting the process's success.

Aim: The study was conducted to determine the effect of virtual reality glasses (VRG) on pain, anxiety, and patient satisfaction during the peripheral intravenous catheter (PIC) process in adults.

Design: An experimental study.

Settings: An emergency department of a university hospital.

Methods: Individuals who were admitted to the emergency unit of the university hospital were recruited between the data collection dates. Data from individuals' "Patient Information Form," "Visual Pain Scale," "Visual Anxiety Scale," and "Visual Satisfaction Scale" were collected. "VR-Box 3D Glasses" was used as virtual reality glasses.

Results: In our study, when the pain point averages with VAS were compared during the PIC process, the pain score average of the patients in the control group was 5.78 ± 1.23 visual anxiety scale 5.89 ± 1.23 and patient satisfaction scale 3.86 ± 2.48, The visual pain score average of patients in the VRG group is 4.12 ± 2.16, visual anxiety scale 3.14 ± 1.76 and visual patient satisfaction scale 7.64 ± 3.26. In short, it has been detected that the pain, anxiety, and patient satisfaction score averages of patients in the VRG group are statistically significant compared to the pain score averages of patients in the control group (p < .005). Our study unearthed a statistically significant relationship at an average level of negative direction between PIC post-treatment pain, anxiety, and patient satisfaction (r = - 0.476).

Conclusion: Utilization of VRG has been detected to reduce pain and anxiety felt during the PIC process in adult patients and increase process satisfaction. VRG, a non-pharmacological, non-invasive, inexpensive, and feasible nursing initiative, may be recommended for use in pain and anxiety control in patients undergoing PIC treatment.

虚拟现实眼镜视频流对外周静脉置管过程中疼痛焦虑和满意度的影响
背景:外周静脉导管(PIC)的实施是最常见的高侵入性护理措施之一。目的:本研究旨在确定虚拟现实眼镜(VRG)对成人外周静脉置管(PIC)过程中疼痛、焦虑和患者满意度的影响:设计:实验研究:环境:一所大学医院的急诊科:方法:在数据收集日期之间招募大学医院急诊科的住院患者。收集 "患者信息表"、"视觉疼痛量表"、"视觉焦虑量表 "和 "视觉满意度量表 "中的数据。使用 "VR-Box 3D眼镜 "作为虚拟现实眼镜:在我们的研究中,当比较 PIC 过程中的疼痛点平均值与 VAS 时,对照组患者的疼痛评分平均值为 5.78 ± 1.23,视觉焦虑评分为 5.89 ± 1.23,患者满意度评分为 3.86 ± 2.48;VRG 组患者的视觉疼痛评分平均值为 4.12 ± 2.16,视觉焦虑评分为 3.14 ± 1.76,视觉患者满意度评分为 7.64 ± 3.26。总之,与对照组患者的疼痛评分平均值相比,VRG 组患者的疼痛、焦虑和患者满意度评分平均值具有显著的统计学意义(P < .005)。我们的研究发现,PIC 治疗后疼痛、焦虑和患者满意度之间存在统计学意义上的显著负相关关系(r = - 0.476):结论:研究发现,使用 VRG 可以减轻成年患者在 PIC 过程中的疼痛和焦虑感,并提高过程满意度。VRG是一种非药物、非侵入性、廉价且可行的护理措施,可推荐用于控制接受PIC治疗的患者的疼痛和焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信