An overview of the current diagnostic approach to Periprosthetic Joint Infections.

IF 1.4 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedic Reviews Pub Date : 2024-06-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.52965/001c.120308
Talal Al-Jabri, Mohamed Ridha, Matthew J Wood, Babar Kayani, Chethan Jayadev, Robert Allan McCulloch, Emil Schemitsch
{"title":"An overview of the current diagnostic approach to Periprosthetic Joint Infections.","authors":"Talal Al-Jabri, Mohamed Ridha, Matthew J Wood, Babar Kayani, Chethan Jayadev, Robert Allan McCulloch, Emil Schemitsch","doi":"10.52965/001c.120308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) presents a formidable challenge to orthopaedic surgeons due to its complex and diverse manifestations. Accurate diagnosis is of utmost importance, as even mild pain following joint replacement surgery may indicate PJI in the absence of a definitive gold standard diagnostic test. Numerous diagnostic modalities have been suggested in the literature, and international societies have continually updated diagnostic criteria for this debilitating complication. This review article aims to comprehensively examine the latest evidence-based approaches for diagnosing PJI. Through a thorough analysis of current literature, we explore promising diagnostic strategies that have demonstrated effectiveness in identifying PJI. These strategies encompass the utilization of laboratory markers, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), alongside imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and leukocyte scintigraphy. Additionally, we highlight the importance of synovial fluid analysis, including the potential role of alpha-defensin as a biomarker, and examine evolving international diagnostic criteria to standardize and improve diagnostic accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Reviews","volume":"16 ","pages":"120308"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11218870/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.120308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) presents a formidable challenge to orthopaedic surgeons due to its complex and diverse manifestations. Accurate diagnosis is of utmost importance, as even mild pain following joint replacement surgery may indicate PJI in the absence of a definitive gold standard diagnostic test. Numerous diagnostic modalities have been suggested in the literature, and international societies have continually updated diagnostic criteria for this debilitating complication. This review article aims to comprehensively examine the latest evidence-based approaches for diagnosing PJI. Through a thorough analysis of current literature, we explore promising diagnostic strategies that have demonstrated effectiveness in identifying PJI. These strategies encompass the utilization of laboratory markers, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), alongside imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and leukocyte scintigraphy. Additionally, we highlight the importance of synovial fluid analysis, including the potential role of alpha-defensin as a biomarker, and examine evolving international diagnostic criteria to standardize and improve diagnostic accuracy.

当前假体周围关节感染诊断方法概述。
由于假体周围关节感染(PJI)的表现复杂多样,其诊断对骨科医生来说是一项艰巨的挑战。准确诊断至关重要,因为在缺乏明确的金标准诊断测试的情况下,即使关节置换手术后出现轻微疼痛,也可能预示着假体周围关节感染。文献中提出了许多诊断方法,国际学会也在不断更新这种使人衰弱的并发症的诊断标准。这篇综述文章旨在全面研究诊断 PJI 的最新循证方法。通过对当前文献的全面分析,我们探讨了在识别 PJI 方面已证明有效的诊断策略。这些策略包括利用实验室指标,如红细胞沉降率(ESR)和 C 反应蛋白(CRP),以及成像技术,如磁共振成像(MRI)和白细胞闪烁成像。此外,我们还强调了滑液分析的重要性,包括α-防御素作为生物标志物的潜在作用,并研究了不断发展的国际诊断标准,以规范和提高诊断的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopedic Reviews
Orthopedic Reviews ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
122
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Reviews is an Open Access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles concerned with any aspect of orthopedics, as well as diagnosis and treatment, trauma, surgical procedures, arthroscopy, sports medicine, rehabilitation, pediatric and geriatric orthopedics. All bone-related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology papers are also welcome. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, reviews and case reports of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信