Effects of fan cooling with an air-perfused rucksack on physiological and perceptual strains in young men while running in uncompensable hot environment.
{"title":"Effects of fan cooling with an air-perfused rucksack on physiological and perceptual strains in young men while running in uncompensable hot environment.","authors":"Masanobu Kajiki, Naoyuki Yamashita, Takaaki Matsumoto","doi":"10.23736/S0022-4707.24.15948-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cooling devices reduce thermal strain during pre-, between-, and postexercise. However, their efficacy during moderate/intensity runs in hot conditions with airflow equivalent to the running speed remains unclear. This study assessed physiological and perceptual responses to neck and upper back fan-cooling through an air-perfused rucksack under such conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten young men ran at 60% V̇O<inf>2peak</inf> for 30 min in 35 °C, 50% relative humidity with (FAN) and without (CON) air-perfused rucksacks with a hood in a randomized order. Headwind equal to running speed was provided in both conditions. The fan-cooling trial consisted of upper back and neck fan cooling with airflow at 4-5 m/s via two fans attached on either side of the rucksack. Rectal and skin temperatures, whole-body thermal sensation, thermal comfort, and changes in body mass were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Upper back skin temperature and thermal sensation were significantly lower throughout the exercise in the FAN than in the CON, whereas thermal comfort was significantly higher at 15-40 min in the FAN (all P≤0.05). Heart rate elevation during 30 min of running was attenuated in the FAN compared to that in the CON (P≤0.05). No significant differences in rectal and mean skin temperatures, or total body mass loss were observed between the two trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results indicate that additional fan-cooling on the upper back and neck during running in uncompensable hot conditions with a headwind had limited physiological benefits. However, whole-body-based thermal sensation and comfort are partially improved with the use of an air-perfused rucksack.</p>","PeriodicalId":17013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.24.15948-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cooling devices reduce thermal strain during pre-, between-, and postexercise. However, their efficacy during moderate/intensity runs in hot conditions with airflow equivalent to the running speed remains unclear. This study assessed physiological and perceptual responses to neck and upper back fan-cooling through an air-perfused rucksack under such conditions.
Methods: Ten young men ran at 60% V̇O2peak for 30 min in 35 °C, 50% relative humidity with (FAN) and without (CON) air-perfused rucksacks with a hood in a randomized order. Headwind equal to running speed was provided in both conditions. The fan-cooling trial consisted of upper back and neck fan cooling with airflow at 4-5 m/s via two fans attached on either side of the rucksack. Rectal and skin temperatures, whole-body thermal sensation, thermal comfort, and changes in body mass were measured.
Results: Upper back skin temperature and thermal sensation were significantly lower throughout the exercise in the FAN than in the CON, whereas thermal comfort was significantly higher at 15-40 min in the FAN (all P≤0.05). Heart rate elevation during 30 min of running was attenuated in the FAN compared to that in the CON (P≤0.05). No significant differences in rectal and mean skin temperatures, or total body mass loss were observed between the two trials.
Conclusions: These results indicate that additional fan-cooling on the upper back and neck during running in uncompensable hot conditions with a headwind had limited physiological benefits. However, whole-body-based thermal sensation and comfort are partially improved with the use of an air-perfused rucksack.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness publishes scientific papers relating to the area of the applied physiology, preventive medicine, sports medicine and traumatology, sports psychology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines.