Usefulness of the Kansas University Standing Balance Scale in inpatient rehabilitation: a retrospective validation study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Asall Kim, Younji Kim, Myungki Ji, Jae-Young Lim
{"title":"Usefulness of the Kansas University Standing Balance Scale in inpatient rehabilitation: a retrospective validation study.","authors":"Asall Kim, Younji Kim, Myungki Ji, Jae-Young Lim","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adequate balance assessment is essential for designing rehabilitation programs and preventing falls. This study aimed to report the cross-cultural adaptation of the Korean version of the Kansas University Standing Balance Scale (KUSBS), investigate its concurrent and predictive validities, and examine aging-related differences. The adaptation was performed using a standard protocol. In this retrospective study, 1179 patients were included and classified into adult, young-old, old-old, and oldest-old groups. Furthermore, we compared the concurrent, discriminant, and predictive validities of the KUSBS and Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Nonparametric analysis was also conducted. The Spearman rho test revealed strong correlation coefficients between the KUSBS and BBS (r s  > 0.7; P  < 0.001). At admission, the relationship was strong in the adult, young-old, and old-old groups (r s  = 0.931, 0.913, and 0.914, respectively; P  < 0.001) but not the oldest-old group (r s  = 0.790; P  < 0.001). At discharge, the correlation coefficients were above 0.9 in all groups. Additionally, the relationship between the changes in both scales was moderate-to-strong (r s  > 0.68; P  < 0.001). The predictive validity for independent walking of the KUSBS was strong (r s  = 0.791; P  < 0.001) and significantly lower than that of the BBS (r s  = 0.833; P  < 0.001; Z = -3.001; P  = 0.003). Furthermore, the cutoff value of the KUSBS at admission to predict independent ambulatory walkers at discharge was 3.5 in ordinal ranking in all age groups. The KUSBS is a reliable and effective tool for measuring balance in patients in inpatient rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":" ","pages":"221-228"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000635","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adequate balance assessment is essential for designing rehabilitation programs and preventing falls. This study aimed to report the cross-cultural adaptation of the Korean version of the Kansas University Standing Balance Scale (KUSBS), investigate its concurrent and predictive validities, and examine aging-related differences. The adaptation was performed using a standard protocol. In this retrospective study, 1179 patients were included and classified into adult, young-old, old-old, and oldest-old groups. Furthermore, we compared the concurrent, discriminant, and predictive validities of the KUSBS and Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Nonparametric analysis was also conducted. The Spearman rho test revealed strong correlation coefficients between the KUSBS and BBS (r s  > 0.7; P  < 0.001). At admission, the relationship was strong in the adult, young-old, and old-old groups (r s  = 0.931, 0.913, and 0.914, respectively; P  < 0.001) but not the oldest-old group (r s  = 0.790; P  < 0.001). At discharge, the correlation coefficients were above 0.9 in all groups. Additionally, the relationship between the changes in both scales was moderate-to-strong (r s  > 0.68; P  < 0.001). The predictive validity for independent walking of the KUSBS was strong (r s  = 0.791; P  < 0.001) and significantly lower than that of the BBS (r s  = 0.833; P  < 0.001; Z = -3.001; P  = 0.003). Furthermore, the cutoff value of the KUSBS at admission to predict independent ambulatory walkers at discharge was 3.5 in ordinal ranking in all age groups. The KUSBS is a reliable and effective tool for measuring balance in patients in inpatient rehabilitation.

堪萨斯大学站立平衡量表在住院康复中的实用性:一项回顾性验证研究。
充分的平衡评估对于设计康复计划和预防跌倒至关重要。本研究旨在报告堪萨斯大学站立平衡量表(KUSBS)韩文版的跨文化改编情况,调查其并发效度和预测效度,并研究与老龄化相关的差异。改编采用标准协议进行。在这项回顾性研究中,我们纳入了 1179 名患者,并将其分为成人组、青年组、老年组和高龄组。此外,我们还比较了 KUSBS 和 Berg 平衡量表 (BBS) 的并发效度、判别效度和预测效度。我们还进行了非参数分析。Spearman rho 检验显示,KUSBS 和 BBS 之间存在很强的相关系数(rs > 0.7; P 0.68; P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Rehabilitation Research is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research into functioning, disability and contextual factors experienced by persons of all ages in both developed and developing societies. The wealth of information offered makes the journal a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and administrators in such fields as rehabilitation medicine, outcome measurement nursing, social and vocational rehabilitation/case management, return to work, special education, social policy, social work and social welfare, sociology, psychology, psychiatry assistive technology and environmental factors/disability. Areas of interest include functioning and disablement throughout the life cycle; rehabilitation programmes for persons with physical, sensory, mental and developmental disabilities; measurement of functioning and disability; special education and vocational rehabilitation; equipment access and transportation; information technology; independent living; consumer, legal, economic and sociopolitical aspects of functioning, disability and contextual factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信