Diagnostic MRI for deep pelvic endometriosis: towards a standardized protocol?

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
European Radiology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1007/s00330-024-10842-0
Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, Christine Sadjo Zoua, Marc Bazot, Michele Monroc, Horace Roman, Léo Razakamanantsoa, Pascal Rousset
{"title":"Diagnostic MRI for deep pelvic endometriosis: towards a standardized protocol?","authors":"Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, Christine Sadjo Zoua, Marc Bazot, Michele Monroc, Horace Roman, Léo Razakamanantsoa, Pascal Rousset","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-10842-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the diagnostic efficacy of an MRI protocol and patient preparation in detecting deep pelvic endometriosis (DPE).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The cohort is from the ENDOVALIRM database, a multicentric national retrospective study involving women who underwent MRI followed by pelvic surgery for endometriosis (reference standard). Two senior radiologists independently analyzed MRI findings using the deep pelvic endometriosis index (dPEI) to determine lesion locations. The study evaluated the impact of bowel preparation, vaginal and rectal opacification, MRI unit type (1.5-T or 3-T), additional sequences (thin slice T2W or 3DT2W), and gadolinium injection on reader performance for diagnosing DPE locations. Fisher's exact test assessed differences in diagnostic accuracy based on patient preparation and MRI parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final cohort comprised 571 women with a mean age of 33.3 years (± 6.6 SD). MRI with bowel preparation outperformed MRI without bowel preparation in identifying torus/uterosacral ligament (USL) locations (p < 0.0001) and rectosigmoid nodules (p = 0.01). MRI without vaginal opacification diagnosed 94.1% (301/320) of torus/USL locations, surpassing MR with vaginal opacification, which diagnosed 85% (221/260) (p < 0.001). No significant differences related to bowel preparation or vaginal opacification were observed for other DPE locations. Rectal opacification did not affect diagnostic accuracy in the overall population, except in patients without bowel preparation, where performance improved (p = 0.04). There were no differences in diagnostic accuracy regarding MRI unit type (1.5-T/3-T), presence of additional sequences, or gadolinium injection for any endometriotic locations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bowel preparation prior to MRI examination is preferable to rectal or vaginal opacification for diagnosing deep endometriosis pelvic lesions.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>Accurate diagnosis and staging of DPE are essential for effective treatment planning. Bowel preparation should be prioritized over rectal or vaginal opacification in MRI protocols. Optimizing MRI protocols for diagnostic performance with appropriate opacification techniques will help diagnose deep endometriosis more accurately.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Evaluating deep endometriosis in collapsible organs such as the vagina and rectum is difficult. Bowel preparation and an absence of vaginal opacification were found to be diagnostically beneficial. Bowel preparation should be prioritized over rectal or vaginal opacification in MRI protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"7705-7715"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10842-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the diagnostic efficacy of an MRI protocol and patient preparation in detecting deep pelvic endometriosis (DPE).

Material and methods: The cohort is from the ENDOVALIRM database, a multicentric national retrospective study involving women who underwent MRI followed by pelvic surgery for endometriosis (reference standard). Two senior radiologists independently analyzed MRI findings using the deep pelvic endometriosis index (dPEI) to determine lesion locations. The study evaluated the impact of bowel preparation, vaginal and rectal opacification, MRI unit type (1.5-T or 3-T), additional sequences (thin slice T2W or 3DT2W), and gadolinium injection on reader performance for diagnosing DPE locations. Fisher's exact test assessed differences in diagnostic accuracy based on patient preparation and MRI parameters.

Results: The final cohort comprised 571 women with a mean age of 33.3 years (± 6.6 SD). MRI with bowel preparation outperformed MRI without bowel preparation in identifying torus/uterosacral ligament (USL) locations (p < 0.0001) and rectosigmoid nodules (p = 0.01). MRI without vaginal opacification diagnosed 94.1% (301/320) of torus/USL locations, surpassing MR with vaginal opacification, which diagnosed 85% (221/260) (p < 0.001). No significant differences related to bowel preparation or vaginal opacification were observed for other DPE locations. Rectal opacification did not affect diagnostic accuracy in the overall population, except in patients without bowel preparation, where performance improved (p = 0.04). There were no differences in diagnostic accuracy regarding MRI unit type (1.5-T/3-T), presence of additional sequences, or gadolinium injection for any endometriotic locations.

Conclusion: Bowel preparation prior to MRI examination is preferable to rectal or vaginal opacification for diagnosing deep endometriosis pelvic lesions.

Clinical relevance statement: Accurate diagnosis and staging of DPE are essential for effective treatment planning. Bowel preparation should be prioritized over rectal or vaginal opacification in MRI protocols. Optimizing MRI protocols for diagnostic performance with appropriate opacification techniques will help diagnose deep endometriosis more accurately.

Key points: Evaluating deep endometriosis in collapsible organs such as the vagina and rectum is difficult. Bowel preparation and an absence of vaginal opacification were found to be diagnostically beneficial. Bowel preparation should be prioritized over rectal or vaginal opacification in MRI protocols.

Abstract Image

盆腔深部子宫内膜异位症的磁共振成像诊断:走向标准化方案?
目的评估核磁共振成像方案和患者准备对检测盆腔深部子宫内膜异位症(DPE)的诊断效果:研究对象来自ENDOVALIRM数据库,该数据库是一项多中心的全国性回顾性研究,涉及因子宫内膜异位症(参考标准)而接受磁共振成像检查并进行盆腔手术的妇女。两名资深放射科医生使用盆腔深部子宫内膜异位症指数(dPEI)独立分析核磁共振成像结果,以确定病灶位置。研究评估了肠道准备、阴道和直肠不透光、核磁共振成像设备类型(1.5T 或 3T)、附加序列(薄片 T2W 或 3DT2W)和钆注射对读者诊断 DPE 位置的影响。费雪精确检验评估了基于患者准备和磁共振成像参数的诊断准确性差异:最终结果显示,571 名妇女的平均年龄为 33.3 岁(± 6.6 SD)。在确定环/子宫骶骨韧带(USL)位置方面,有肠道准备的核磁共振成像优于无肠道准备的核磁共振成像(p 结论:在诊断深部子宫内膜异位症盆腔病变时,核磁共振检查前肠道准备优于直肠或阴道不透光检查:DPE的准确诊断和分期对于有效的治疗计划至关重要。在磁共振成像方案中,肠道准备应优先于直肠或阴道不透光。利用适当的不透光技术优化磁共振成像方案,有助于更准确地诊断深部子宫内膜异位症:要点:评估阴道和直肠等塌陷器官中的深部子宫内膜异位症非常困难。研究发现,肠道准备和无阴道不透明有利于诊断。在磁共振成像方案中,肠道准备应优先于直肠或阴道不透明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信