Cholesterol Lowering in Older Adults: Should We Wait for Further Evidence?

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Current Atherosclerosis Reports Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1007/s11883-024-01224-4
Yasser A Jamil, Rachel Cohen, Dana K Alameddine, Salil V Deo, Manish Kumar, Ariela R Orkaby
{"title":"Cholesterol Lowering in Older Adults: Should We Wait for Further Evidence?","authors":"Yasser A Jamil, Rachel Cohen, Dana K Alameddine, Salil V Deo, Manish Kumar, Ariela R Orkaby","doi":"10.1007/s11883-024-01224-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Current guidelines for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in adults up to age 75 years are well-established. However, recommendations for lipid-lowering therapies (LLT), particularly for primary prevention, are inconclusive after age 75. In this review, we focus on adults ≥ 75 years to assess low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) as a marker for predicting atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk, review risk assessment tools, highlight guidelines for LLT, and discuss benefits, risks, and deprescribing strategies.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The relationship between LDL-C and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in older adults is complex and confounded. Current ASCVD risk estimators heavily depend on age and lack geriatric-specific variables. Emerging tools may reclassify individuals based on biologic rather than chronologic age, with coronary artery calcium scores gaining popularity. After initiating LLT for primary or secondary prevention, target LDL-C levels for older adults are lacking, and non-statin therapy thresholds remain unknown, relying on evidence from younger populations. Shared decision-making is crucial, considering therapy's time to benefit, life expectancy, adverse events, and geriatric syndromes. Deprescribing is recommended in end-of-life care but remains unclear in fit or frail older adults. After an ASCVD event, LLT is appropriate for most older adults, and deprescribing can be considered for those approaching the last months of life. Ongoing trials will guide statin prescription and deprescribing among older adults free of ASCVD. In the interim, for adults ≥ 75 years without a limited life expectancy who are free of ASCVD, an LLT approach that includes both lifestyle and medications, specifically statins, may be considered after shared decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":10875,"journal":{"name":"Current Atherosclerosis Reports","volume":" ","pages":"521-536"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Atherosclerosis Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-024-01224-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Current guidelines for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in adults up to age 75 years are well-established. However, recommendations for lipid-lowering therapies (LLT), particularly for primary prevention, are inconclusive after age 75. In this review, we focus on adults ≥ 75 years to assess low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) as a marker for predicting atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk, review risk assessment tools, highlight guidelines for LLT, and discuss benefits, risks, and deprescribing strategies.

Recent findings: The relationship between LDL-C and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in older adults is complex and confounded. Current ASCVD risk estimators heavily depend on age and lack geriatric-specific variables. Emerging tools may reclassify individuals based on biologic rather than chronologic age, with coronary artery calcium scores gaining popularity. After initiating LLT for primary or secondary prevention, target LDL-C levels for older adults are lacking, and non-statin therapy thresholds remain unknown, relying on evidence from younger populations. Shared decision-making is crucial, considering therapy's time to benefit, life expectancy, adverse events, and geriatric syndromes. Deprescribing is recommended in end-of-life care but remains unclear in fit or frail older adults. After an ASCVD event, LLT is appropriate for most older adults, and deprescribing can be considered for those approaching the last months of life. Ongoing trials will guide statin prescription and deprescribing among older adults free of ASCVD. In the interim, for adults ≥ 75 years without a limited life expectancy who are free of ASCVD, an LLT approach that includes both lifestyle and medications, specifically statins, may be considered after shared decision-making.

Abstract Image

降低老年人胆固醇:我们是否应该等待更多证据?
回顾的目的:目前,针对 75 岁以下成年人心血管事件的一级和二级预防指南已经确立。然而,关于降脂疗法(LLT)的建议,尤其是用于一级预防的建议,在 75 岁以后尚无定论。在这篇综述中,我们以≥75岁的成年人为重点,评估低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)作为预测动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险的标志物,回顾风险评估工具,强调LLT指南,并讨论其益处、风险和停药策略:低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)与老年人全因死亡率和心血管疾病预后之间的关系既复杂又混乱。目前的急性心血管疾病风险评估主要依赖于年龄,缺乏老年病特异性变量。随着冠状动脉钙化评分的普及,新出现的工具可能会根据生物学年龄而非实际年龄对个体进行重新分类。在开始使用 LLT 进行一级或二级预防后,缺乏针对老年人的目标 LDL-C 水平,而非他汀类药物治疗的阈值仍然未知,只能依赖于年轻人群的证据。考虑到治疗获益时间、预期寿命、不良事件和老年综合征,共同决策至关重要。建议在临终关怀时取消处方,但对于身体健康或虚弱的老年人来说,这一点仍不明确。在发生 ASCVD 事件后,LLT 适用于大多数老年人,而对于那些接近生命最后几个月的老年人,可以考虑停药。正在进行的试验将为无 ASCVD 的老年人的他汀类药物处方和停药提供指导。在此期间,对于年龄≥ 75 岁、预期寿命有限且无 ASCVD 的成年人,可在共同决策后考虑采用包括生活方式和药物(尤其是他汀类药物)在内的 LLT 方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of this journal is to systematically provide expert views on current basic science and clinical advances in the field of atherosclerosis and highlight the most important developments likely to transform the field of cardiovascular prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. We accomplish this aim by appointing major authorities to serve as Section Editors who select leading experts from around the world to provide definitive reviews on key topics and papers published in the past year. We also provide supplementary reviews and commentaries from well-known figures in the field. An Editorial Board of internationally diverse members suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信