Real-World Clinical Performance of a Novolimus-Eluting Stent Versus a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Chun-Chin Chang, Wei-Ting Sung, Ya-Wen Lu, Ming-Ju Chuang, Yin-Hao Lee, Yi-Lin Tsai, Ruey-Hsing Chou, Shao-Sung Huang, Po-Hsun Huang
{"title":"Real-World Clinical Performance of a Novolimus-Eluting Stent Versus a Sirolimus-Eluting Stent","authors":"Chun-Chin Chang,&nbsp;Wei-Ting Sung,&nbsp;Ya-Wen Lu,&nbsp;Ming-Ju Chuang,&nbsp;Yin-Hao Lee,&nbsp;Yi-Lin Tsai,&nbsp;Ruey-Hsing Chou,&nbsp;Shao-Sung Huang,&nbsp;Po-Hsun Huang","doi":"10.1002/clc.24317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The DESyne novolimus-eluting coronary stent (NES) is a new-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) that is widely used, but clinical data are rarely reported for this stent. We compared the safety and effectiveness of the DESyne NES and the Orsiro bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a retrospective, single-center, observational study. Between July 2017 and December 2022, patients who presented with chronic or acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI with DESyne NES or Orsiro SES were consecutively enrolled in the present study. The primary endpoint, major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), was a composite of cardiovascular death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target-lesion revascularization.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 776 patients (age 68.8 ± 12.2; 75.9% male) undergoing PCI were included. Overall, 231 patients with 313 lesions received NES and 545 patients with 846 lesions received SES. During a follow-up duration of 784 ± 522 days, the primary endpoint occurred in 10 patients (4.3%) in the NES group and in 36 patients (6.6%) in the SES group. After multivariate adjustment, the risk of MACE did not significantly differ between groups (NES vs. SES, hazard ratio 0.74, 95% CI, 0.35–1.55, <i>p</i> = 0.425). The event rate of individual components of the primary endpoint was comparable between the two groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Favorable and similar clinical outcomes were observed in patients undergoing PCI with either NES or SES in a medium-term follow-up duration. Future studies with adequately powered clinical endpoints are required for further evaluation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"47 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11217985/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.24317","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The DESyne novolimus-eluting coronary stent (NES) is a new-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) that is widely used, but clinical data are rarely reported for this stent. We compared the safety and effectiveness of the DESyne NES and the Orsiro bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

This was a retrospective, single-center, observational study. Between July 2017 and December 2022, patients who presented with chronic or acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI with DESyne NES or Orsiro SES were consecutively enrolled in the present study. The primary endpoint, major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), was a composite of cardiovascular death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target-lesion revascularization.

Results

A total of 776 patients (age 68.8 ± 12.2; 75.9% male) undergoing PCI were included. Overall, 231 patients with 313 lesions received NES and 545 patients with 846 lesions received SES. During a follow-up duration of 784 ± 522 days, the primary endpoint occurred in 10 patients (4.3%) in the NES group and in 36 patients (6.6%) in the SES group. After multivariate adjustment, the risk of MACE did not significantly differ between groups (NES vs. SES, hazard ratio 0.74, 95% CI, 0.35–1.55, p = 0.425). The event rate of individual components of the primary endpoint was comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions

Favorable and similar clinical outcomes were observed in patients undergoing PCI with either NES or SES in a medium-term follow-up duration. Future studies with adequately powered clinical endpoints are required for further evaluation.

Abstract Image

Novolimus洗脱支架与Sirolimus洗脱支架的真实世界临床表现。
简介:DESyne novolimus洗脱冠状动脉支架(NES)是新一代药物洗脱支架(DES),目前已得到广泛应用,但有关该支架的临床数据却鲜有报道。我们比较了DESyne NES和Orsiro生物可吸收聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架(SES)在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者中的安全性和有效性:这是一项回顾性、单中心观察研究。2017年7月至2022年12月期间,本研究连续纳入了接受DESyne NES或Orsiro SES PCI治疗的慢性或急性冠状动脉综合征患者。主要终点即主要不良心血管事件(MACE)是心血管死亡、靶血管心肌梗死或临床驱动的靶器官血运重建的综合结果:共纳入776名接受PCI手术的患者(年龄68.8 ± 12.2;75.9%为男性)。其中,231名患者的313处病变接受了NES治疗,545名患者的846处病变接受了SES治疗。在 784 ± 522 天的随访期间,NES 组有 10 名患者(4.3%)出现主要终点,SES 组有 36 名患者(6.6%)出现主要终点。经多变量调整后,MACE 风险在组间无明显差异(NES vs. SES,危险比 0.74,95% CI,0.35-1.55,p = 0.425)。两组间主要终点的单项事件发生率相当:结论:在中期随访期间,使用NES或SES进行PCI治疗的患者均获得了良好且相似的临床结果。未来的研究需要有足够的临床终点来进行进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Cardiology
Clinical Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Cardiology provides a fully Gold Open Access forum for the publication of original clinical research, as well as brief reviews of diagnostic and therapeutic issues in cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular surgery. The journal includes Clinical Investigations, Reviews, free standing editorials and commentaries, and bonus online-only content. The journal also publishes supplements, Expert Panel Discussions, sponsored clinical Reviews, Trial Designs, and Quality and Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信