{"title":"Role of policy and consumer attitudes in people’s intention to use autonomous vehicles: a comparative study in China and the USA","authors":"Xinghua Li, Jieru Zou, Shubham Agrawal, Yuntao Guo, Tianpei Tang, Xi Feng","doi":"10.1007/s11116-024-10508-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The transition to autonomous vehicles (AVs) will likely vary across countries due to differences in technology advancements, infrastructure, cultural background, and policy. Managing this transition can be challenging, as similar policies may elicit different responses from relevant stakeholders, leading to either societal benefits from the technology or unintended consequences. This study explores the similarities and differences in the impacts of sociodemographic factors, attitudinal factors, and policy-related factors on AV adoption in two countries that are expected to be one of the early adopters: China and the United States. A theoretical framework was developed to examine these impacts, and Multiple Indicators and Multiple Causes models were estimated using 2000 valid survey responses from each country. The model estimation results reveal that certain sociodemographic factors, such as education and income levels, similarly influence AV adoption intentions in both countries. However, other characteristics, like gender and the number of household vehicles, exhibit contrasting effects. Furthermore, attitudinal factors like attitude towards AVs, perceived usefulness, and perceived monetary value significantly impact AV adoption intentions among Chinese respondents, whereas perceived usefulness, perceived nonmonetary value, and subjective norms play a more prominent role in shaping AV adoption intentions among American respondents. In terms of policy impacts, individuals already inclined towards using AVs are more likely to strengthen their intention under all policies, with a more pronounced effect in China, where cultural and economic factors, along with stronger government support for technology, play a significant role.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"116 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10508-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The transition to autonomous vehicles (AVs) will likely vary across countries due to differences in technology advancements, infrastructure, cultural background, and policy. Managing this transition can be challenging, as similar policies may elicit different responses from relevant stakeholders, leading to either societal benefits from the technology or unintended consequences. This study explores the similarities and differences in the impacts of sociodemographic factors, attitudinal factors, and policy-related factors on AV adoption in two countries that are expected to be one of the early adopters: China and the United States. A theoretical framework was developed to examine these impacts, and Multiple Indicators and Multiple Causes models were estimated using 2000 valid survey responses from each country. The model estimation results reveal that certain sociodemographic factors, such as education and income levels, similarly influence AV adoption intentions in both countries. However, other characteristics, like gender and the number of household vehicles, exhibit contrasting effects. Furthermore, attitudinal factors like attitude towards AVs, perceived usefulness, and perceived monetary value significantly impact AV adoption intentions among Chinese respondents, whereas perceived usefulness, perceived nonmonetary value, and subjective norms play a more prominent role in shaping AV adoption intentions among American respondents. In terms of policy impacts, individuals already inclined towards using AVs are more likely to strengthen their intention under all policies, with a more pronounced effect in China, where cultural and economic factors, along with stronger government support for technology, play a significant role.
由于技术进步、基础设施、文化背景和政策的不同,各国向自动驾驶汽车(AVs)的过渡可能会有所不同。管理这种过渡可能具有挑战性,因为类似的政策可能会引起相关利益攸关方的不同反应,从而导致该技术要么给社会带来好处,要么产生意想不到的后果。本研究探讨了社会人口因素、态度因素和政策相关因素对 AV 应用的影响的异同:中国和美国。为了研究这些影响,我们建立了一个理论框架,并使用来自每个国家的 2000 份有效调查问卷估算了多指标和多原因模型。模型估计结果显示,某些社会人口因素,如教育和收入水平,同样影响着两国的 AV 采用意向。然而,其他特征,如性别和家庭车辆数量,则表现出截然不同的影响。此外,中国受访者对自动驾驶汽车的态度、感知有用性和感知货币价值等态度因素对自动驾驶汽车的采用意向有显著影响,而感知有用性、感知非货币价值和主观规范对美国受访者采用自动驾驶汽车的意向有更突出的影响。就政策影响而言,在所有政策下,已经倾向于使用自动驾驶汽车的个人更有可能加强他们的意向,而在中国,文化和经济因素以及政府对技术更有力的支持发挥了重要作用,其影响更为明显。
期刊介绍:
In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world.
These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.