Enhancing Agency in Individuals with Depressive Symptoms: The Roles of Effort, Outcome Valence, and Its Underlying Cognitive Mechanisms and Neural Basis

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Jingyuan Lin, Xuemei Yang, Hong Li, Wuji Lin, Jie Zhang, Yi Lei
{"title":"Enhancing Agency in Individuals with Depressive Symptoms: The Roles of Effort, Outcome Valence, and Its Underlying Cognitive Mechanisms and Neural Basis","authors":"Jingyuan Lin,&nbsp;Xuemei Yang,&nbsp;Hong Li,&nbsp;Wuji Lin,&nbsp;Jie Zhang,&nbsp;Yi Lei","doi":"10.1155/2024/3135532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Background</i>. Agency, a sense of control over one’s actions and outcomes, is crucial for recovery from depressive symptoms. However, the mechanisms that enhance agency in individuals with depressive symptoms remain poorly understood. This study endeavors to elucidate these fundamental processes. <i>Materials and Methods</i>. We recruited 52 participants exhibiting depressive symptoms to participate in a novel Judgment of Agency (JoA) task. This task was structured with a 3 (effort: high load, medium load, low load) × 2 (outcome: win, miss) within-subject design to assess the impact of effort and outcome valence on agency. Throughout the task, we utilized functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to explore the neural mechanisms underlying agency. Furthermore, we conducted a randomized, sham-controlled, pre–post-test trial involving intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) targeted at the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) to investigate its potential to enhance agency. Participants were randomly allocated to either an active iTBS group or a sham group, with each receiving a single session of stimulation (600 pulses). The JoA task was conducted both before and after the stimulation. <i>Results</i>. Effort significantly influenced agency in individuals with depressive symptoms, with this effect being moderated by the outcomes’ valences. Agency was positively correlated with self-efficacy (<i>r</i> = 0.28, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) when goals were achieved with effort, and with anxiety severity (<i>r</i> = 0.29, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) when goals were not achieved. Additionally, it was associated with the activation of several frontal brain regions (all <i>P</i> values &lt; 0.01), including the left DLPFC, right premotor and supplementary motor areas, and the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). Application of iTBS over the left DLPFC significantly enhanced self-attributed agency, particularly when the outcomes were achieved under conditions of low-load effort. <i>Conclusions</i>. Our study highlights the critical role of effort in enhancing agency for individuals with depressive symptoms, with iTBS applied to the left DLPFC showing potential to enhance agency postgoal achievement. Moreover, the activation of the left IFG and the presence of anxiety are associated with maladaptive self-attributed agency, offering potential targets for therapeutic intervention.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/3135532","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/3135532","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Agency, a sense of control over one’s actions and outcomes, is crucial for recovery from depressive symptoms. However, the mechanisms that enhance agency in individuals with depressive symptoms remain poorly understood. This study endeavors to elucidate these fundamental processes. Materials and Methods. We recruited 52 participants exhibiting depressive symptoms to participate in a novel Judgment of Agency (JoA) task. This task was structured with a 3 (effort: high load, medium load, low load) × 2 (outcome: win, miss) within-subject design to assess the impact of effort and outcome valence on agency. Throughout the task, we utilized functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to explore the neural mechanisms underlying agency. Furthermore, we conducted a randomized, sham-controlled, pre–post-test trial involving intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) targeted at the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) to investigate its potential to enhance agency. Participants were randomly allocated to either an active iTBS group or a sham group, with each receiving a single session of stimulation (600 pulses). The JoA task was conducted both before and after the stimulation. Results. Effort significantly influenced agency in individuals with depressive symptoms, with this effect being moderated by the outcomes’ valences. Agency was positively correlated with self-efficacy (r = 0.28, P < 0.05) when goals were achieved with effort, and with anxiety severity (r = 0.29, P < 0.05) when goals were not achieved. Additionally, it was associated with the activation of several frontal brain regions (all P values < 0.01), including the left DLPFC, right premotor and supplementary motor areas, and the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). Application of iTBS over the left DLPFC significantly enhanced self-attributed agency, particularly when the outcomes were achieved under conditions of low-load effort. Conclusions. Our study highlights the critical role of effort in enhancing agency for individuals with depressive symptoms, with iTBS applied to the left DLPFC showing potential to enhance agency postgoal achievement. Moreover, the activation of the left IFG and the presence of anxiety are associated with maladaptive self-attributed agency, offering potential targets for therapeutic intervention.

Abstract Image

增强抑郁症患者的代理能力:努力、结果价值及其潜在认知机制和神经基础的作用
背景。代入感,即对自己的行为和结果的控制感,对于抑郁症状的康复至关重要。然而,人们对增强抑郁症患者代理感的机制仍然知之甚少。本研究试图阐明这些基本过程。材料与方法。我们招募了 52 名有抑郁症状的参与者参与一项新颖的 "代理判断"(JoA)任务。该任务采用 3(努力:高负荷、中负荷、低负荷)×2(结果:赢、输)的受试者内设计,以评估努力和结果情绪对代理的影响。在整个任务过程中,我们利用功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)来探索代理的神经机制。此外,我们还针对左侧背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)进行了一项随机、假对照、前-后测试试验,其中包括间歇性θ-脉冲刺激(iTBS),以研究其增强代理的潜力。参与者被随机分配到主动 iTBS 组或假刺激组,每组接受一次刺激(600 个脉冲)。JoA任务在刺激前后进行。结果显示努力对有抑郁症状的人的代入感有明显的影响,这种影响受结果价值的调节。当通过努力实现目标时,代理与自我效能感呈正相关(r = 0.28,P < 0.05);当未实现目标时,代理与焦虑严重程度呈正相关(r = 0.29,P < 0.05)。此外,它还与多个额叶脑区的激活有关(所有 P 值均为 0.01),包括左侧 DLPFC、右侧运动前区和辅助运动区以及左侧额叶下回(IFG)。在左侧DLPFC上应用iTBS能显著增强自我归因代理能力,尤其是在低负荷努力条件下取得的结果。结论我们的研究强调了努力在增强抑郁症患者的代理能力中的关键作用,在左侧DLPFC应用iTBS显示出了在实现目标后增强代理能力的潜力。此外,左侧 IFG 的激活和焦虑的存在与适应不良的自我归因代理有关,为治疗干预提供了潜在的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信