Perceptions of virtual versus in-person recovery meetings: A cross-sectional survey of Oxford House residents

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Ted J. Bobak, Daniel Wilson, Justin S. Bell, Leonard A. Jason
{"title":"Perceptions of virtual versus in-person recovery meetings: A cross-sectional survey of Oxford House residents","authors":"Ted J. Bobak,&nbsp;Daniel Wilson,&nbsp;Justin S. Bell,&nbsp;Leonard A. Jason","doi":"10.1002/casp.2833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates shifts in the modality of addiction recovery communities from person-to-person interactions to virtual platforms in the context of the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Our study involves members of the Oxford House recovery homes (<i>n</i> = 284), a major network of recovery-supportive housing in the United States and abroad. Many residents participate in 12-step meetings during their stay, traditionally conducted in-person, but due to physical distancing regulations, many of these meetings transitioned to virtual platforms. We collected cross-sectional survey data focusing on user perceptions of virtual 12-step meetings in terms of accessibility, cost, convenience, support network strength and recovery network quality. Our study found significant differences in perceptions among different demographic groups, suggesting challenges in transitioning recovery support to online platforms. Notably, participants aged 46 and older showed a greater propensity to use online recovery forums and found online meetings convenient. Non-White individuals and women demonstrated a more favourable perception of online meetings—a trend that also held true among those with at least some college education. Furthermore, the results show that those who initiated their recovery prior to the COVID-19 lockdown viewed online methods more favourably, particularly in terms of accessibility and cost. Our data also revealed that participants who were categorically involved in 12-step recovery (Alcoholics Anonymous/Narcotics Anonymous) demonstrated a more positive perception of online methods in terms of the strength of social networks and social support quality, despite some resistance to virtual transition and maintaining focus. Further research is needed to understand these nuanced impacts and develop strategies to enhance the effectiveness of online recovery meetings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","volume":"34 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casp.2833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates shifts in the modality of addiction recovery communities from person-to-person interactions to virtual platforms in the context of the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Our study involves members of the Oxford House recovery homes (n = 284), a major network of recovery-supportive housing in the United States and abroad. Many residents participate in 12-step meetings during their stay, traditionally conducted in-person, but due to physical distancing regulations, many of these meetings transitioned to virtual platforms. We collected cross-sectional survey data focusing on user perceptions of virtual 12-step meetings in terms of accessibility, cost, convenience, support network strength and recovery network quality. Our study found significant differences in perceptions among different demographic groups, suggesting challenges in transitioning recovery support to online platforms. Notably, participants aged 46 and older showed a greater propensity to use online recovery forums and found online meetings convenient. Non-White individuals and women demonstrated a more favourable perception of online meetings—a trend that also held true among those with at least some college education. Furthermore, the results show that those who initiated their recovery prior to the COVID-19 lockdown viewed online methods more favourably, particularly in terms of accessibility and cost. Our data also revealed that participants who were categorically involved in 12-step recovery (Alcoholics Anonymous/Narcotics Anonymous) demonstrated a more positive perception of online methods in terms of the strength of social networks and social support quality, despite some resistance to virtual transition and maintaining focus. Further research is needed to understand these nuanced impacts and develop strategies to enhance the effectiveness of online recovery meetings.

对虚拟康复会议与面对面康复会议的看法:牛津之家居民横断面调查
本研究调查了在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的背景下,戒毒社区的模式从人与人之间的互动向虚拟平台的转变。我们的研究涉及牛津之家(Oxford House)康复之家(n = 284)的成员,该康复之家是美国和国外一个主要的康复支持性住房网络。许多住户在入住期间都会参加 12 步会议,传统上这些会议都是面对面进行的,但由于物理距离的规定,许多会议都过渡到了虚拟平台。我们收集了横断面调查数据,重点关注用户对虚拟 12 步会议在可及性、成本、便利性、支持网络强度和康复网络质量等方面的看法。我们的研究发现,不同人口群体之间的看法存在明显差异,这表明将康复支持过渡到在线平台面临挑战。值得注意的是,46 岁及以上的参与者更倾向于使用在线康复论坛,并认为在线会议很方便。非白人和女性对在线会议的看法更为积极,这一趋势在至少受过一定大学教育的人群中也同样存在。此外,研究结果表明,那些在 COVID-19 禁闭之前就开始康复的人对在线方法的看法更为积极,尤其是在可访问性和成本方面。我们的数据还显示,尽管在虚拟过渡和保持注意力方面存在一些阻力,但参与 12 步康复(匿名酗酒者/匿名戒毒者)的参与者在社交网络的强度和社会支持的质量方面对在线方法表现出了更积极的看法。需要进一步开展研究,以了解这些细微的影响,并制定战略来提高在线康复会议的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology publishes papers regarding social behaviour in relation to community problems and strengths. The journal is international in scope, reflecting the common concerns of scholars and community practitioners in Europe and worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信