As a reviewer, how do I decide between recommending rejection of a paper rather than a major revision?

IF 7.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Peter P. Purslow
{"title":"As a reviewer, how do I decide between recommending rejection of a paper rather than a major revision?","authors":"Peter P. Purslow","doi":"10.1016/j.meatsci.2024.109587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An associate editor of the journal has experienced an increase in the number of received reviews where the comments to either the authors or to the editor do not align with the reviewer's recommendation to accept, revise or reject. In particular, some recommendations for outright rejection of a submission have been accompanied by criticisms that clearly could have been solved by revision of the manuscript. The purpose of this letter is to provide some guidance to reviewers on the specific issue of deciding between a recommendation to revise versus reject.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":389,"journal":{"name":"Meat Science","volume":"216 ","pages":"Article 109587"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meat Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0309174024001645","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An associate editor of the journal has experienced an increase in the number of received reviews where the comments to either the authors or to the editor do not align with the reviewer's recommendation to accept, revise or reject. In particular, some recommendations for outright rejection of a submission have been accompanied by criticisms that clearly could have been solved by revision of the manuscript. The purpose of this letter is to provide some guidance to reviewers on the specific issue of deciding between a recommendation to revise versus reject.

作为审稿人,我如何决定建议拒绝论文而不是进行重大修改?
该期刊的一位副主编发现,收到的审稿意见中,给作者或编辑的意见与审稿人提出的接受、修改或拒稿建议不一致的情况越来越多。特别是,有些建议直接拒绝投稿的同时,还提出了一些显然可以通过修改稿件来解决的批评意见。本信的目的是为审稿人提供一些指导,帮助他们在建议修改还是退稿的具体问题上做出决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Meat Science
Meat Science 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
9.90%
发文量
282
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: The aim of Meat Science is to serve as a suitable platform for the dissemination of interdisciplinary and international knowledge on all factors influencing the properties of meat. While the journal primarily focuses on the flesh of mammals, contributions related to poultry will be considered if they enhance the overall understanding of the relationship between muscle nature and meat quality post mortem. Additionally, papers on large birds (e.g., emus, ostriches) as well as wild-captured mammals and crocodiles will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信