SARS-CoV-2 and RSV bronchiolitis outcomes

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Donna R. Mendez MD, EdD , Krishna Paul , Joan Richardson , Dietrich Jehle MD
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2 and RSV bronchiolitis outcomes","authors":"Donna R. Mendez MD, EdD ,&nbsp;Krishna Paul ,&nbsp;Joan Richardson ,&nbsp;Dietrich Jehle MD","doi":"10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Severe acute respiratory syndrome related coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) bronchiolitis has arisen with the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. There is a paucity of literature on SARS-CoV-2 bronchiolitis.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of our paper was to review and compare outcomes in bronchiolitis due to severe acute respiratory syndrome related coronavirus 2 (SARS- CoV-2) and Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV). We also performed a subgroup analysis of two disrupted RSV seasons during the pandemic.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective study from a US TriNetX database from March 1, 2020-January 1, 2023. Propensity matching was utilized for confounders.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was a total of 3,592 patients (1,796 in each group) after propensity matching.</p><p>There was an increased risk of oxygen saturation ≤95 % (RR=1.50 95 % CI 1.58–1.94, <em>p</em> = 0.002) and ICU admission (RR=1.44 95 % CI 1.06–1.94, <em>p</em> = 0.02) in those with SARS- CoV-2 but not for oxygen saturation ≤90 % (RR=1.03 95 %CI 0.75–1.42, <em>p</em> = 0.85) or intubation (RR=0.73 95 % CI 0.35–1.47, <em>p</em> = 0.37). There was a decreased risk of a patient with SARS- CoV-2 bronchiolitis being hospitalized (RR=0.65 95 % CI 0.57–0.74, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001), respiratory rate ≥60 (RR=0.64 95 % CI 0.48–0.88, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) or ≥70 (RR=0.64 95 % CI 0.43–0.96, <em>p</em> = 0.03) when compared to RSV bronchiolitis. Specifically examining SARS- CoV-2 versus RSV bronchiolitis during the delayed RSV seasons, during the first season both infections were not severe, but during the second RSV bronchiolitis season, patients infected with RSV had less risk of ICU admission compared to those infected with SARS- CoV-2.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>SARS- CoV-2 bronchiolitis patients appeared to have more severe outcomes since the risk of ICU admission was higher for these patients. Also, during the second delayed RSV season, SARS- CoV-2 bronchiolitis was more severe than RSV bronchiolitis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55064,"journal":{"name":"Heart & Lung","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart & Lung","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147956324001122","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Severe acute respiratory syndrome related coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) bronchiolitis has arisen with the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. There is a paucity of literature on SARS-CoV-2 bronchiolitis.

Objective

The purpose of our paper was to review and compare outcomes in bronchiolitis due to severe acute respiratory syndrome related coronavirus 2 (SARS- CoV-2) and Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV). We also performed a subgroup analysis of two disrupted RSV seasons during the pandemic.

Methods

This was a retrospective study from a US TriNetX database from March 1, 2020-January 1, 2023. Propensity matching was utilized for confounders.

Results

There was a total of 3,592 patients (1,796 in each group) after propensity matching.

There was an increased risk of oxygen saturation ≤95 % (RR=1.50 95 % CI 1.58–1.94, p = 0.002) and ICU admission (RR=1.44 95 % CI 1.06–1.94, p = 0.02) in those with SARS- CoV-2 but not for oxygen saturation ≤90 % (RR=1.03 95 %CI 0.75–1.42, p = 0.85) or intubation (RR=0.73 95 % CI 0.35–1.47, p = 0.37). There was a decreased risk of a patient with SARS- CoV-2 bronchiolitis being hospitalized (RR=0.65 95 % CI 0.57–0.74, p < 0.0001), respiratory rate ≥60 (RR=0.64 95 % CI 0.48–0.88, p < 0.001) or ≥70 (RR=0.64 95 % CI 0.43–0.96, p = 0.03) when compared to RSV bronchiolitis. Specifically examining SARS- CoV-2 versus RSV bronchiolitis during the delayed RSV seasons, during the first season both infections were not severe, but during the second RSV bronchiolitis season, patients infected with RSV had less risk of ICU admission compared to those infected with SARS- CoV-2.

Conclusion

SARS- CoV-2 bronchiolitis patients appeared to have more severe outcomes since the risk of ICU admission was higher for these patients. Also, during the second delayed RSV season, SARS- CoV-2 bronchiolitis was more severe than RSV bronchiolitis.

SARS-CoV-2 和 RSV 支气管炎的结果
背景严重急性呼吸系统综合征相关冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)支气管炎随着 SARS-CoV-2 的大流行而出现。本文旨在回顾和比较严重急性呼吸系统综合征相关冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)和呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)引起的支气管炎的结果。我们还对大流行期间的两个RSV中断季节进行了亚组分析。方法这是一项回顾性研究,数据来自2020年3月1日至2023年1月1日的美国TriNetX数据库。氧饱和度≤95%的风险增加(RR=1.50 95 % CI 1.58-1.SARS-CoV-2患者的血氧饱和度≤95%(RR=1.50 95 % CI 1.58-1.94,p = 0.002)和入住ICU(RR=1.44 95 % CI 1.06-1.94,p = 0.02)的风险增加,但血氧饱和度≤90%(RR=1.03 95 %CI 0.75-1.42,p = 0.85)或插管(RR=0.73 95 % CI 0.35-1.47,p = 0.37)的风险没有增加。与 RSV 支气管炎相比,SARS-CoV-2 支气管炎患者住院的风险降低(RR=0.65 95 % CI 0.57-0.74,p = 0.0001),呼吸频率≥60(RR=0.64 95 % CI 0.48-0.88,p = 0.001)或≥70(RR=0.64 95 % CI 0.43-0.96,p = 0.03)。结论SARS-CoV-2 支气管炎患者的结局似乎更严重,因为这些患者入住 ICU 的风险更高。此外,在第二个延迟的 RSV 流行季节,SARS-CoV-2 支气管炎比 RSV 支气管炎更严重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart & Lung
Heart & Lung 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
184
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Heart & Lung: The Journal of Cardiopulmonary and Acute Care, the official publication of The American Association of Heart Failure Nurses, presents original, peer-reviewed articles on techniques, advances, investigations, and observations related to the care of patients with acute and critical illness and patients with chronic cardiac or pulmonary disorders. The Journal''s acute care articles focus on the care of hospitalized patients, including those in the critical and acute care settings. Because most patients who are hospitalized in acute and critical care settings have chronic conditions, we are also interested in the chronically critically ill, the care of patients with chronic cardiopulmonary disorders, their rehabilitation, and disease prevention. The Journal''s heart failure articles focus on all aspects of the care of patients with this condition. Manuscripts that are relevant to populations across the human lifespan are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信