Physician barriers and dilemmas in the execution of clinical trials impacting decision-making in the DAHANCA 35 proton therapy trial for head and neck cancer

Q1 Nursing
Anne Wilhøft Kristensen , Cai Grau , Kenneth Jensen , Susanne Oksbjerre Dalton , Jeppe Friborg , Annesofie Lunde Jensen
{"title":"Physician barriers and dilemmas in the execution of clinical trials impacting decision-making in the DAHANCA 35 proton therapy trial for head and neck cancer","authors":"Anne Wilhøft Kristensen ,&nbsp;Cai Grau ,&nbsp;Kenneth Jensen ,&nbsp;Susanne Oksbjerre Dalton ,&nbsp;Jeppe Friborg ,&nbsp;Annesofie Lunde Jensen","doi":"10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Physicians manage multiple obligations, providing best-practice treatment and patient- centred care in the standard treatment pathway while contributing to clinical trials simultaneously. These multifaceted responsibilities may introduce barriers and dilemmas to clinical trial execution, potentially impacting the clinical trial decision- making process. This study explores physicians’ barriers and dilemmas in executing clinical trials and the impact on clinical trial decision-making.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with experienced oncologists. Moreover, participant observations were performed during clinical encounters involving discussions about clinical trials. The analysis followed a structured approach: (1) transcription of data, (2) inductive text coding, (3) exploration of patterns, and (4) interpretation, leading to the results. The results were discussed and validated by the study participants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results comprise (1) a description of the clinical practice, which presents the setting of clinical trial execution; (2) results regarding physicians’ barriers and dilemmas in executing clinical trials, leading to (3) the impact on clinical trial decision- making. The results involve barriers to time constraints for clinical trial tasks, dilemmas emerging from trial requirements or deviations from standard guidelines, and challenges with providing sufficient trial communication and adequate decision-making support, balancing between a paternalistic approach and respecting patient autonomy.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The demanding obligations of clinical practice constitute a complex setting for executing clinical trials, resulting in numerous barriers and dilemmas that impact the decision-making process in clinical trials. The study emphasises the need for tailored clinical trial decision-making interventions to facilitate supportive, informed, and non-directive clinical trial decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36328,"journal":{"name":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563242400026X/pdfft?md5=29fb77d55fb214204c40f1d1f0ba82d2&pid=1-s2.0-S240563242400026X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563242400026X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Physicians manage multiple obligations, providing best-practice treatment and patient- centred care in the standard treatment pathway while contributing to clinical trials simultaneously. These multifaceted responsibilities may introduce barriers and dilemmas to clinical trial execution, potentially impacting the clinical trial decision- making process. This study explores physicians’ barriers and dilemmas in executing clinical trials and the impact on clinical trial decision-making.

Method

Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with experienced oncologists. Moreover, participant observations were performed during clinical encounters involving discussions about clinical trials. The analysis followed a structured approach: (1) transcription of data, (2) inductive text coding, (3) exploration of patterns, and (4) interpretation, leading to the results. The results were discussed and validated by the study participants.

Results

The results comprise (1) a description of the clinical practice, which presents the setting of clinical trial execution; (2) results regarding physicians’ barriers and dilemmas in executing clinical trials, leading to (3) the impact on clinical trial decision- making. The results involve barriers to time constraints for clinical trial tasks, dilemmas emerging from trial requirements or deviations from standard guidelines, and challenges with providing sufficient trial communication and adequate decision-making support, balancing between a paternalistic approach and respecting patient autonomy.

Conclusion

The demanding obligations of clinical practice constitute a complex setting for executing clinical trials, resulting in numerous barriers and dilemmas that impact the decision-making process in clinical trials. The study emphasises the need for tailored clinical trial decision-making interventions to facilitate supportive, informed, and non-directive clinical trial decision-making.

影响 DAHANCA 35 头颈癌质子治疗试验决策的临床试验执行中的医生障碍和困境
背景医生肩负多重责任,既要在标准治疗路径中提供最佳治疗和以患者为中心的护理,又要同时为临床试验做出贡献。这些多方面的责任可能会给临床试验的执行带来障碍和困境,从而可能影响临床试验的决策过程。本研究探讨了医生在执行临床试验过程中遇到的障碍和困境,以及这些障碍和困境对临床试验决策的影响。此外,还在讨论临床试验的临床接触过程中对参与者进行了观察。分析采用结构化方法:(1) 转录数据;(2) 归纳文本编码;(3) 探索模式;(4) 解释,最终得出结果。结果结果包括:(1)临床实践描述,展示了临床试验执行的背景;(2)医生在执行临床试验时遇到的障碍和困境,从而得出(3)对临床试验决策的影响。结果涉及临床试验任务的时间限制障碍、试验要求或偏离标准指南所产生的困境,以及提供充分的试验沟通和适当的决策支持、在家长式方法和尊重患者自主权之间取得平衡所面临的挑战。本研究强调,有必要采取有针对性的临床试验决策干预措施,以促进支持性、知情和非指导性的临床试验决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
67 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信