Effects of three-dimensional femur and tibia postures on the parameters of standing long-leg radiographs for osteoarthritic knees in elderly female subjects
{"title":"Effects of three-dimensional femur and tibia postures on the parameters of standing long-leg radiographs for osteoarthritic knees in elderly female subjects","authors":"Kazutaka Otani , Takashi Sato , Koichi Kobayashi , Tomoharu Mochizuki , Osamu Tanifuji , Ryota Katsumi , Hiroyuki Kawashima","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Long-leg frontal radiographs of the lower extremities are used to assess knee osteoarthritis. Given the three-dimensional (3D) nature of alignment changes in osteoarthritis, postural alterations in the femur and tibia extend beyond the coronal plane (in-plane) to include the transverse and sagittal planes (out-of-plane). This study investigates the impact of these out-of-plane factors on in-plane knee alignment parameters observed in frontal radiographs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 97 osteoarthritic knees in women were examined. Using a 3D-to-two-dimensional (2D) image matching technique, we evaluated the 3D postures of the femur and tibia in the standing position as viewed from frontal radiographs in the world coordinate system. Statistical analyses were conducted to explore associations between these 3D postures and 2D alignment parameters obtained from frontal radiographs under identical conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>The femur exhibited a medial inclination of 2.7°, a posterior inclination of 3.9°, and an internal rotation of 4.2°, whereas the tibia showed a lateral inclination of 6.4°, an anterior inclination of 6.7°, and an internal rotation of 6.7°. Both coronal and rotational postures of femur and tibia influenced the hip-knee-ankle angle, mechanical axis percentage, and medial proximal tibial angle. However, only coronal factors of tibia impacted tibial joint line obliquity relative to the floor.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Attention should be paid to the potential impact of the out-of-plane postures of the femur and tibia on parameters assessed in plain frontal radiographs of the lower extremities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50992,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Biomechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003324001293/pdfft?md5=38865dd6424cec2d7364ec702fdabc13&pid=1-s2.0-S0268003324001293-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268003324001293","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Long-leg frontal radiographs of the lower extremities are used to assess knee osteoarthritis. Given the three-dimensional (3D) nature of alignment changes in osteoarthritis, postural alterations in the femur and tibia extend beyond the coronal plane (in-plane) to include the transverse and sagittal planes (out-of-plane). This study investigates the impact of these out-of-plane factors on in-plane knee alignment parameters observed in frontal radiographs.
Methods
A total of 97 osteoarthritic knees in women were examined. Using a 3D-to-two-dimensional (2D) image matching technique, we evaluated the 3D postures of the femur and tibia in the standing position as viewed from frontal radiographs in the world coordinate system. Statistical analyses were conducted to explore associations between these 3D postures and 2D alignment parameters obtained from frontal radiographs under identical conditions.
Findings
The femur exhibited a medial inclination of 2.7°, a posterior inclination of 3.9°, and an internal rotation of 4.2°, whereas the tibia showed a lateral inclination of 6.4°, an anterior inclination of 6.7°, and an internal rotation of 6.7°. Both coronal and rotational postures of femur and tibia influenced the hip-knee-ankle angle, mechanical axis percentage, and medial proximal tibial angle. However, only coronal factors of tibia impacted tibial joint line obliquity relative to the floor.
Interpretation
Attention should be paid to the potential impact of the out-of-plane postures of the femur and tibia on parameters assessed in plain frontal radiographs of the lower extremities.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Biomechanics is an international multidisciplinary journal of biomechanics with a focus on medical and clinical applications of new knowledge in the field.
The science of biomechanics helps explain the causes of cell, tissue, organ and body system disorders, and supports clinicians in the diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of treatment methods and technologies. Clinical Biomechanics aims to strengthen the links between laboratory and clinic by publishing cutting-edge biomechanics research which helps to explain the causes of injury and disease, and which provides evidence contributing to improved clinical management.
A rigorous peer review system is employed and every attempt is made to process and publish top-quality papers promptly.
Clinical Biomechanics explores all facets of body system, organ, tissue and cell biomechanics, with an emphasis on medical and clinical applications of the basic science aspects. The role of basic science is therefore recognized in a medical or clinical context. The readership of the journal closely reflects its multi-disciplinary contents, being a balance of scientists, engineers and clinicians.
The contents are in the form of research papers, brief reports, review papers and correspondence, whilst special interest issues and supplements are published from time to time.
Disciplines covered include biomechanics and mechanobiology at all scales, bioengineering and use of tissue engineering and biomaterials for clinical applications, biophysics, as well as biomechanical aspects of medical robotics, ergonomics, physical and occupational therapeutics and rehabilitation.