The impact of nursing workforce skill-mix on patient outcomes in intensive care units in Victoria, Australia

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Paul Ross RN, BHSc Nur, PGCert ICU, MN Research, Med Adult, PhD Candidate , Rose Jaspers RN, BN(Hons), MAdvClinNur , Jason Watterson RN, BHSc Nur, PGDipAdvNur CritCare, Med Adult, PhD , Michelle Topple RN, BHSc Nur, PGDipSci, PGCert ICU , Tania Birthisel RN, BN (Distinction), PGDip Nursing ICU, CertIV TAE, MProfEd&Trng , Melissa Rosenow , Jason McClure MB ChB, MRCP, FRCA, FCICM, Dip Engineering , Ged Williams AO, RN, PGCert ICU, BHSc. Adv. Nursing, LLM, MHA, FACN, FACHSM, FAAN , Wendy Pollock RN, RM, Grad Cert Adv Learning & Leadership, Grad Dip Ed, Grad Dip Crit Car Nsg, PhD , David Pilcher MBBS MRCP(UK) FCICM FRACP
{"title":"The impact of nursing workforce skill-mix on patient outcomes in intensive care units in Victoria, Australia","authors":"Paul Ross RN, BHSc Nur, PGCert ICU, MN Research, Med Adult, PhD Candidate ,&nbsp;Rose Jaspers RN, BN(Hons), MAdvClinNur ,&nbsp;Jason Watterson RN, BHSc Nur, PGDipAdvNur CritCare, Med Adult, PhD ,&nbsp;Michelle Topple RN, BHSc Nur, PGDipSci, PGCert ICU ,&nbsp;Tania Birthisel RN, BN (Distinction), PGDip Nursing ICU, CertIV TAE, MProfEd&Trng ,&nbsp;Melissa Rosenow ,&nbsp;Jason McClure MB ChB, MRCP, FRCA, FCICM, Dip Engineering ,&nbsp;Ged Williams AO, RN, PGCert ICU, BHSc. Adv. Nursing, LLM, MHA, FACN, FACHSM, FAAN ,&nbsp;Wendy Pollock RN, RM, Grad Cert Adv Learning & Leadership, Grad Dip Ed, Grad Dip Crit Car Nsg, PhD ,&nbsp;David Pilcher MBBS MRCP(UK) FCICM FRACP","doi":"10.1016/j.ccrj.2024.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This article aims to examine the impact of nursing workforce skill-mix (percentage of critical care registered nurses [CCRN]) in the intensive care unit (ICU) during a patient's stay.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Registry linked cohort study of the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database and the Critical Health Resources Information System using real-time nursing workforce data.</p></div><div><h3>Settings</h3><p>Fifteen public and 5 private hospital ICUs in Victoria, Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>There were 16,618 adult patients admitted between 1 December 2021 and 30 September 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>Primary outcome: in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes: in-ICU mortality, development of delirium, pressure injury, duration of stay in-ICU and hospital, after-hours discharge from ICU and readmission to ICU.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 6563 (39.5%) patients were cared for in ICUs with &gt;75% CCRN, 7695 (46.3%) in ICUs with 50–75% CCRN, and 2360 (14.2%) in ICUs with &lt;50% CCRN. In-hospital mortality was 534 (8.1%) vs. 859 (11.2%) vs. 252 (10.7%) respectively. After adjusting for confounders, patients cared for in ICUs with 50–75% CCRN (adjusted OR 1.21 [95% CI 1.02–1.45]) were more likely to die compared to patients in ICUs with &gt;75% CCRN. A similar but non-significant trend was seen in ICUs with &lt;50% CCRN (adjusted OR 1.21 [95% CI 0.94–1.55]), when compared to patients in ICUs with &gt;75% CCRN. In-ICU mortality, delirium, pressure injuries, after-hours discharge and ICU length of stay were lower in ICUs with CCRN&gt;75%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The nursing skill-mix in ICU impacts outcomes and should be routinely monitored. Health system regulators, hospital administrators and ICU leaders should ensure nursing workforce planning and education align with these findings to maximise patient outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49215,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277224000073/pdfft?md5=ad56c53e3b427ddb83eca17ebc80ad04&pid=1-s2.0-S1441277224000073-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277224000073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This article aims to examine the impact of nursing workforce skill-mix (percentage of critical care registered nurses [CCRN]) in the intensive care unit (ICU) during a patient's stay.

Design

Registry linked cohort study of the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database and the Critical Health Resources Information System using real-time nursing workforce data.

Settings

Fifteen public and 5 private hospital ICUs in Victoria, Australia.

Participants

There were 16,618 adult patients admitted between 1 December 2021 and 30 September 2022.

Main outcome measures

Primary outcome: in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes: in-ICU mortality, development of delirium, pressure injury, duration of stay in-ICU and hospital, after-hours discharge from ICU and readmission to ICU.

Results

In total, 6563 (39.5%) patients were cared for in ICUs with >75% CCRN, 7695 (46.3%) in ICUs with 50–75% CCRN, and 2360 (14.2%) in ICUs with <50% CCRN. In-hospital mortality was 534 (8.1%) vs. 859 (11.2%) vs. 252 (10.7%) respectively. After adjusting for confounders, patients cared for in ICUs with 50–75% CCRN (adjusted OR 1.21 [95% CI 1.02–1.45]) were more likely to die compared to patients in ICUs with >75% CCRN. A similar but non-significant trend was seen in ICUs with <50% CCRN (adjusted OR 1.21 [95% CI 0.94–1.55]), when compared to patients in ICUs with >75% CCRN. In-ICU mortality, delirium, pressure injuries, after-hours discharge and ICU length of stay were lower in ICUs with CCRN>75%.

Conclusion

The nursing skill-mix in ICU impacts outcomes and should be routinely monitored. Health system regulators, hospital administrators and ICU leaders should ensure nursing workforce planning and education align with these findings to maximise patient outcomes.

澳大利亚维多利亚州重症监护病房护理人员技能组合对患者预后的影响
本文旨在研究重症监护病房(ICU)护理人员技能组合(重症监护注册护士[CCRN]的比例)对患者住院期间的影响。参与者2021年12月1日至2022年9月30日期间收治的16618名成人患者。主要结果测量主要结果:院内死亡率。次要结果:重症监护室内死亡率、谵妄发生率、压伤、重症监护室和住院时间、重症监护室下班后出院情况以及重症监护室再入院情况。结果共有 6563 名(39.5%)患者在 CCRN 为 75% 的重症监护室接受治疗,7695 名(46.3%)患者在 CCRN 为 50%-75% 的重症监护室接受治疗,2360 名(14.2%)患者在 CCRN 为 50% 的重症监护室接受治疗。院内死亡率分别为 534 (8.1%) vs. 859 (11.2%) vs. 252 (10.7%)。在对混杂因素进行调整后,与 CCRN 为 50%-75% 的重症监护病房的患者相比,CCRN 为 50%-75% 的重症监护病房的患者更容易死亡(调整后 OR 为 1.21 [95% CI 为 1.02-1.45])。与CCRN为75%的重症监护病房相比,CCRN为50%的重症监护病房(调整后OR值为1.21 [95% CI 0.94-1.55])的患者也有类似的趋势,但并不显著。结论 ICU 中的护理技能组合对治疗效果有影响,应进行常规监测。卫生系统监管者、医院管理者和重症监护室领导应确保护理人员的规划和教育与这些研究结果相一致,以最大限度地提高患者的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care and Resuscitation
Critical Care and Resuscitation CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ritical Care and Resuscitation (CC&R) is the official scientific journal of the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM). The Journal is a quarterly publication (ISSN 1441-2772) with original articles of scientific and clinical interest in the specialities of Critical Care, Intensive Care, Anaesthesia, Emergency Medicine and related disciplines. The Journal is received by all Fellows and trainees, along with an increasing number of subscribers from around the world. The CC&R Journal currently has an impact factor of 3.3, placing it in 8th position in world critical care journals and in first position in the world outside the USA and Europe.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信