Comparing high fidelity simulator versus wearable simulator on team communication, clinical judgment, and patient safety in an interprofessional team

Abstract

Background

Escalating maternal morbidity and mortality rates in the United States demand effective healthcare provider training. This study examined an interprofessional team's communication, clinical judgment, and patient safety using a high-fidelity simulator versus a wearable simulator by a standard patient.

Methods

The study employed a two-group comparative, quasi-experimental design. The intervention group used a wearable simulator, while the control group used a high-fidelity mannequin.

Results

The final sample consisted of 85 individuals (49 intervention, 33 control group). No significant differences in simulation effectiveness were observed between groups.

Conclusion

Equivalent performance outcomes suggest institutions can choose simulation modalities based on cost, availability, and logistical considerations without compromising training quality.