Shortest or locally quickest? A prediction-based approach for evacuation choice simulation between multiple staircases

IF 3.7 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ying Hua , Jincheng Zhao , Hai-Ting Li , Liping Duan
{"title":"Shortest or locally quickest? A prediction-based approach for evacuation choice simulation between multiple staircases","authors":"Ying Hua ,&nbsp;Jincheng Zhao ,&nbsp;Hai-Ting Li ,&nbsp;Liping Duan","doi":"10.1016/j.jnlssr.2024.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Staircase choice is one of the most critical factors leading to the difference in pedestrian flow and evacuation routes in buildings with multiple staircases. Neither the shortest path to the building exit nor the locally quickest path to the nearest staircase can represent the natural mode of evacuation path choices for an authentic evacuation simulation. Thus, a prediction-based approach is established to predict and simulate evacuation choices, which helps to address three key issues: (1) extracting evacuation data through a controlled experiment; (2) establishing a Logit model for staircase choice prediction based on experimental data; (3) developing a prediction-based cellular automaton model. The proposed approach has achieved the coupling between choice prediction and evacuation simulation. A comparison with Pathfinder software is conducted to reveal the superiority of the prediction-based CA model for simulating staircase choice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":62710,"journal":{"name":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 281-294"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666449624000252/pdfft?md5=84aac10068738455db49a36f56e95163&pid=1-s2.0-S2666449624000252-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"安全科学与韧性(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666449624000252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Staircase choice is one of the most critical factors leading to the difference in pedestrian flow and evacuation routes in buildings with multiple staircases. Neither the shortest path to the building exit nor the locally quickest path to the nearest staircase can represent the natural mode of evacuation path choices for an authentic evacuation simulation. Thus, a prediction-based approach is established to predict and simulate evacuation choices, which helps to address three key issues: (1) extracting evacuation data through a controlled experiment; (2) establishing a Logit model for staircase choice prediction based on experimental data; (3) developing a prediction-based cellular automaton model. The proposed approach has achieved the coupling between choice prediction and evacuation simulation. A comparison with Pathfinder software is conducted to reveal the superiority of the prediction-based CA model for simulating staircase choice.

最短还是局部最快?基于预测的多楼梯疏散选择模拟方法
在有多个楼梯的建筑物中,楼梯选择是导致人流和疏散路线差异的最关键因素之一。在真实的疏散模拟中,通往大楼出口的最短路径和通往最近楼梯的局部最快路径都不能代表疏散路径选择的自然模式。因此,建立了一种基于预测的方法来预测和模拟疏散选择,这有助于解决三个关键问题:(1)通过受控实验提取疏散数据;(2)基于实验数据建立楼梯选择预测的 Logit 模型;(3)开发基于预测的蜂窝自动机模型。所提出的方法实现了选择预测与疏散模拟之间的耦合。通过与 Pathfinder 软件的比较,揭示了基于预测的 CA 模型在模拟楼梯选择方面的优越性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
安全科学与韧性(英文)
安全科学与韧性(英文) Management Science and Operations Research, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Safety Research
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信