A critical analysis of public private partnership model in energy from waste projects

IF 3.3 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Junaid Tahir , Mark Atkinson , Zhigang Tian , Mohamad Kassem , Rafiq Ahmad , Pablo Martinez
{"title":"A critical analysis of public private partnership model in energy from waste projects","authors":"Junaid Tahir ,&nbsp;Mark Atkinson ,&nbsp;Zhigang Tian ,&nbsp;Mohamad Kassem ,&nbsp;Rafiq Ahmad ,&nbsp;Pablo Martinez","doi":"10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Public Private Partnerships (PPP) and the Private Finance Initiative (PFI) have been significantly adopted over the last three decades as a mechanism for the delivery and financing of projects. Various infrastructure project types in the energy and the transport sectors have adopted this procurement system for their ‘anticipated’ effectiveness in risk distribution and value for money. Yet, their acclaimed benefits, particularly in ensuring value for money in the waste to energy – or energy-from-wastes (EfW) – sector are under significant scrutiny. Governments and investors are increasingly questioning their fiscal efficiency and overall benefit to taxpayers. Despite these concerns, studies investigating whether PFI provides value of money of PFI in EfW are lacking. This study addresses this gap by comparing the PFI models used in the UK and Canada in currently operative EfW projects using mixed risk epistemology approach combining methods that provide both a real and objective evaluation of issues and risks and a subjective (or opinion-based) evaluation. The former is achieved through a quantitative probabilistic model for simulating EfW feasibility at the operation phase. The quantitative probabilistic model is capable to model and capture how operational phase costs and profitability are affected by lifecycle risks (such as quality of service driven by contractual requirements that are usually passed on to the Operation and Maintenance (O&amp;M) contractor) and a range of technical, payment and incentive dynamic variables and their fluctuations. If the impact of these variables is not considered and modelled accurately, the O&amp;M contractor could incur significant losses undermining the viability of the EfW project. The latter employs a psychometric methodology to delve into the primary concerns of professionals involved in EfW projects regarding associated risks. The results show that common O&amp;M risks identified in EfW PPP projects in UK and Canada prevail around unplanned maintenance, infeed waste reduction, market price, unsustainable debts, and policy changes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34478,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Futures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266618882400090X/pdfft?md5=30f0beb310a1279e3391ffaaf02d1d14&pid=1-s2.0-S266618882400090X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Futures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266618882400090X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Public Private Partnerships (PPP) and the Private Finance Initiative (PFI) have been significantly adopted over the last three decades as a mechanism for the delivery and financing of projects. Various infrastructure project types in the energy and the transport sectors have adopted this procurement system for their ‘anticipated’ effectiveness in risk distribution and value for money. Yet, their acclaimed benefits, particularly in ensuring value for money in the waste to energy – or energy-from-wastes (EfW) – sector are under significant scrutiny. Governments and investors are increasingly questioning their fiscal efficiency and overall benefit to taxpayers. Despite these concerns, studies investigating whether PFI provides value of money of PFI in EfW are lacking. This study addresses this gap by comparing the PFI models used in the UK and Canada in currently operative EfW projects using mixed risk epistemology approach combining methods that provide both a real and objective evaluation of issues and risks and a subjective (or opinion-based) evaluation. The former is achieved through a quantitative probabilistic model for simulating EfW feasibility at the operation phase. The quantitative probabilistic model is capable to model and capture how operational phase costs and profitability are affected by lifecycle risks (such as quality of service driven by contractual requirements that are usually passed on to the Operation and Maintenance (O&M) contractor) and a range of technical, payment and incentive dynamic variables and their fluctuations. If the impact of these variables is not considered and modelled accurately, the O&M contractor could incur significant losses undermining the viability of the EfW project. The latter employs a psychometric methodology to delve into the primary concerns of professionals involved in EfW projects regarding associated risks. The results show that common O&M risks identified in EfW PPP projects in UK and Canada prevail around unplanned maintenance, infeed waste reduction, market price, unsustainable debts, and policy changes.

垃圾发电项目中的公私合作模式批判性分析
公私合作伙伴关系(PPP)和私人融资计划(PFI)作为一种项目交付和融资机制,在过去三十年中得到了广泛采用。能源和运输部门的各类基础设施项目都采用了这种采购制度,因为它们在风险分配和资金效益方面具有 "预期 "的有效性。然而,其广为人知的优势,尤其是在确保废物变能源(或垃圾发电(EfW))领域的资金效益方面,正受到严格审查。政府和投资者对其财政效率和纳税人的整体利益提出了越来越多的质疑。尽管存在这些问题,但仍缺乏对 PFI 是否能为垃圾焚烧发电提供资金价值的研究。本研究针对这一空白,采用混合风险认识论方法,结合对问题和风险进行真实客观评估以及主观(或基于观点)评估的方法,对英国和加拿大目前运行的垃圾焚烧发电项目中使用的 PFI 模式进行比较。前者是通过一个定量概率模型来模拟垃圾焚烧发电在运营阶段的可行性。定量概率模型能够模拟和捕捉运营阶段的成本和盈利能力如何受到生命周期风险(如通常转嫁给运营和维护(O&M)承包商的合同要求所驱动的服务质量)以及一系列技术、付款和激励动态变量及其波动的影响。如果不考虑这些变量的影响并对其进行准确建模,运营和维护承包商可能会遭受重大损失,从而影响垃圾焚烧发电项目的可行性。后者采用心理测量方法,深入研究参与垃圾焚烧发电项目的专业人员对相关风险的主要关切。结果表明,在英国和加拿大的垃圾焚烧发电公私伙伴关系项目中发现的常见运营和管理风险主要集中在计划外维护、进料废物减少、市场价格、不可持续的债务和政策变化等方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Futures
Sustainable Futures Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Futures: is a journal focused on the intersection of sustainability, environment and technology from various disciplines in social sciences, and their larger implications for corporation, government, education institutions, regions and society both at present and in the future. It provides an advanced platform for studies related to sustainability and sustainable development in society, economics, environment, and culture. The scope of the journal is broad and encourages interdisciplinary research, as well as welcoming theoretical and practical research from all methodological approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信