Does social media use make us happy? A meta-analysis on social media and positive well-being outcomes

IF 4.1 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Laura Marciano , Jeffrey Lin , Taisuke Sato , Sundas Saboor , Kasisomayajula Viswanath
{"title":"Does social media use make us happy? A meta-analysis on social media and positive well-being outcomes","authors":"Laura Marciano ,&nbsp;Jeffrey Lin ,&nbsp;Taisuke Sato ,&nbsp;Sundas Saboor ,&nbsp;Kasisomayajula Viswanath","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2024.100331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In social media use research on mental health, a comprehensive summary of the association between social media use and “positive” well-being in all its nuances, including different well-being indicators considered separately, is lacking. To fill the gap, we carried out a meta-analytic review of the literature by including 78 studies published between 2009 and September 2022. In our meta-analyses, we explored the association between social media use (time spent on using social media, active and passive use, communication, problematic use, social comparison, and other positive and negative experiences) and well-being (conceptualized as hedonic, eudaimonic, social, and other positive indices). Hedonic well-being, i.e., experiencing positive emotions and life satisfaction, was associated with social media communication (r=0.11) and positive online experiences (r=0.21) and negatively with problematic social media use (r=−0.13) and social comparison on social media (r=−0.30). Eudaimonic well-being, i.e., a sense of purpose and meaning, was only negatively related to problematic social media use (r=−0.26). Social well-being was positively related to social media time (r=0.07) and social media communication (r=0.18). Also, overall measures of positive well-being were associated with active social media use (r=0.08), communication through social media (r=0.12), number of friends (r=0.14), social media intensity (r=0.21), and other positive experiences (r=0.19). Conversely, social media comparison (r=−0.30) and problematic social media use (r=−0.13) showed negative correlations with positive well-being. The analyses add to our understanding of how social media may contribute to ill-being and well-being by disentangling positive from negative effects, and pave the way for interventions aiming at using social media to improve well-being.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74861,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Mental health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560324000367/pdfft?md5=18c8b94b9b70aa1d4068c558e60f512e&pid=1-s2.0-S2666560324000367-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560324000367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In social media use research on mental health, a comprehensive summary of the association between social media use and “positive” well-being in all its nuances, including different well-being indicators considered separately, is lacking. To fill the gap, we carried out a meta-analytic review of the literature by including 78 studies published between 2009 and September 2022. In our meta-analyses, we explored the association between social media use (time spent on using social media, active and passive use, communication, problematic use, social comparison, and other positive and negative experiences) and well-being (conceptualized as hedonic, eudaimonic, social, and other positive indices). Hedonic well-being, i.e., experiencing positive emotions and life satisfaction, was associated with social media communication (r=0.11) and positive online experiences (r=0.21) and negatively with problematic social media use (r=−0.13) and social comparison on social media (r=−0.30). Eudaimonic well-being, i.e., a sense of purpose and meaning, was only negatively related to problematic social media use (r=−0.26). Social well-being was positively related to social media time (r=0.07) and social media communication (r=0.18). Also, overall measures of positive well-being were associated with active social media use (r=0.08), communication through social media (r=0.12), number of friends (r=0.14), social media intensity (r=0.21), and other positive experiences (r=0.19). Conversely, social media comparison (r=−0.30) and problematic social media use (r=−0.13) showed negative correlations with positive well-being. The analyses add to our understanding of how social media may contribute to ill-being and well-being by disentangling positive from negative effects, and pave the way for interventions aiming at using social media to improve well-being.

使用社交媒体会让我们快乐吗?关于社交媒体和积极幸福结果的荟萃分析
在有关心理健康的社交媒体使用研究中,缺乏对社交媒体使用与 "积极 "幸福感之间关系的所有细微差别(包括单独考虑的不同幸福感指标)的全面总结。为了填补这一空白,我们对 2009 年至 2022 年 9 月间发表的 78 篇文献进行了元分析综述。在荟萃分析中,我们探讨了社交媒体使用(使用社交媒体的时间、主动和被动使用、交流、有问题的使用、社会比较以及其他积极和消极体验)与幸福感(概念化为享乐型、幸福型、社会型和其他积极指数)之间的关联。享乐型幸福感,即体验积极情绪和生活满意度,与社交媒体交流(r=0.11)和积极的在线体验(r=0.21)相关,与社交媒体的问题使用(r=-0.13)和社交媒体上的社会比较(r=-0.30)呈负相关。幸福感(即目的感和意义感)只与社交媒体使用问题呈负相关(r=-0.26)。社会幸福感与社交媒体时间(r=0.07)和社交媒体交流(r=0.18)呈正相关。此外,积极幸福感的总体测量与社交媒体的活跃使用(r=0.08)、社交媒体的沟通(r=0.12)、朋友数量(r=0.14)、社交媒体的强度(r=0.21)和其他积极体验(r=0.19)相关。相反,社交媒体比较(r=-0.30)和社交媒体使用问题(r=-0.13)与积极幸福感呈负相关。这些分析通过将积极影响与消极影响区分开来,加深了我们对社交媒体如何可能导致不幸福和幸福的理解,并为旨在利用社交媒体改善幸福的干预措施铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SSM. Mental health
SSM. Mental health Social Psychology, Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
118 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信